haha. another SSD convert.nib95 said:Just installed my C300 256GB SSD with a clean install of windows and my word, boots up in like 10 seconds. Unbelievable. Everything just feels generally snappy too. For example, on Windows load, it's done as soon as you see your wallpaper/home page. All drivers etc in play (for me Nvidia display, Huey Pro calibrator etc). Pre-SSD I always had to wait several seconds for everything to kick in and for my calibration settings to be applied. Now I don't even get to see what it looks like pre-calibrated settings.
Next up, testing games performance followed by Premiere Pro (with CUDA) and CS5 (Photoshop, Flash, InDesign etc) load/work/file saving!
nib95 said:Just installed my C300 256GB SSD with a clean install of windows and my word, boots up in like 10 seconds. Unbelievable. Everything just feels generally snappy too. For example, on Windows load, it's done as soon as you see your wallpaper/home page. All drivers etc in play (for me Nvidia display, Huey Pro calibrator etc). Pre-SSD I always had to wait several seconds for everything to kick in and for my calibration settings to be applied. Now I don't even get to see what it looks like pre-calibrated settings.
Next up, testing games performance followed by Premiere Pro (with CUDA) and CS5 (Photoshop, Flash, InDesign etc) load/work/file saving!
evil solrac v3.0 said:disregard that advise on antec cases, they are top of the line and the 900 and 1200 are still highly recommended.
keeblerdrow said:You make me feel old.
slidewinder said:So beyond boot-up, does a system drive SSD often make for noticeably better responsiveness during regular usage? Like by having swap on it do things come back to normal faster after exiting a game that used a lot of memory (causing system .dlls and resident programs to get swapped out) and things like that?
mkenyon said:However, I'm not rich enough to blow tons of money on them for lots of usable space. I still stand firmly behind the 2-3 500GB-1TB WD Black/Spinpoint F3s for a gaming drive. Having every single one of my 70+ games on Steam installed and ready to rock is a wonderous thing.
nib95 said:Does that mean your games still load relatively slow? What do you use the SSD for then besides general apps and Windows?
mkenyon said:No. On my big rig I run 3xSpinpoint F3 1TBs in RAID0 It's just as fast as the SSD but consumes a ton more power, produces a lot more heat, and is far less reliable. That's what I have the fileserver for, though. The SSDs are for just general use. Opening programs and doing random things in them is super fast. Faster than I can give it commands, that's for sure.
nib95 said:Does that mean if just one of the HDD's in your RAID set up die, you technically lose all your data? Also, would you mind explaining how Fileserver works? Thanks.
Laekon said:Is there a way to decide between the 560 GTX and the 6950 1GB? At this point in time it doesn't seem wise to get a 460 GTX for a 1920 x 1080 monitor when these cards are just a little more.
nib95 said:Does that mean if just one of the HDD's in your RAID set up die, you technically lose all your data? Also, would you mind explaining how Fileserver works? Thanks.
mkenyon said:Yes, that does mean that. It's why I only keep my games on it. The fileserver is an actual computer running a RAID5 array on Linux. It backs up all my data as well as hosts all my media. RAID5 means that you can rebuild the array if any one of the HDDs fail.
If you really want to learn about it, check out this link for a good intro. Otherwise, you could use a NAS for storage, which is a lot easier to do.
teh_pwn said:Both 1 GB? Get the 6950. But how much are you saving by getting the 1 GB option? $15?
http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html
You can also use RAID1 and get way reduced risk of file loss. You get a read performance boost too.
Looks like you've done your homework.Quicksilver4648 said:So, GAF, I am a long time lurker but only recently signed up. (This is my first post!) I have been following this thread for a while but as a console gamer primarily I haven't paid too much attention to the specifics of new hardware. However, after seeing the Battlefield 3 videos I suddenly feel motivated to make a capable gaming PC. I am currently using a 3 year-old laptop which suits me for 99% of all things (other than games).
Note: I realize BF3 is still under development so specific specs for that title are just guesses and assumptions, nothing more. But, since the going talk is that the BF3 demo was run using a single GTX 580 I assume further optimizations will lower the entry requirement in GPUs.
Your Current Specs: HP dv2550se laptop with Core 2 Duo @ 1.50 GHz, 3 GB DDR2 RAM, and integrated graphics.
Budget: <$1000, located in the US
Main Use: Gaming, some emulation, HD video capturing/editing
Monitor Resolution: 1080p 21" monitor (this wont be upgraded)
List SPECIFIC games that you MUST be able to play: Dolphin emulation for the Wii/GCN, Battlefield: BC2, Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit, Crysis, TF2, and Minecraft (lol)
Are reusing any parts?: Nope
When will you build?: Sometime in April, possibly as late as May. I am in no real rush.
Will you be overclocking?: I want to say no, but I most likely will.
I have already done some research of parts and I would really appreciate it if you could give some input/suggestions. I think all of my pieces should work together but since I have never made a PC before I just want to play it safe.
Case: COOLER MASTER Centurion 5 II - $60
MB: Asus P8P67 Pro - $180?
CPU: Intel i5-2500k - $230
GPU: GIGABYTE GV-N560OC-1GI GeForce GTX 560 Ti - $250
RAM: G.SKILL Ripjaws F3-10666CL9D-8GBXL 8GB (2x4GB) DDR3 1333 (PC3 10666) - $85
HDD: Western Digital Caviar Black 500 GB 7200 RPM - $60
Drive: Asus DRW-24B1ST - $19
PSU: CORSAIR TX750 V2 750W - $120
Total: $1,004 in Newegg prices. I have an Amazon Prime account so I would probably get a number of items from them since I get free two-day shipping.
A couple of thing I want to point out:
1) CPU - I will probably overclock it to 4GHz and nothing more.
2) GPU - I am unsure if I should get something much cheaper and weaker and wait till BF3 and upgrade to the new hotness. Or, should I get the GTX 560 Ti now, playing current games very well, and just hope that BF3 doesn't have specs that are through the roof. And if they are I would need to get another GTX 560 Ti and use it though SLI.
3) RAM: I jumped back and forth a thousand times searching for the best RAM per dollar. I ended up just picking these because Newegg has "Designed Specifically for Intel Sandy Bridge CPUs, H67 and P67 Platforms" in the description.
4) HDD - I really, really wanted to get an SSD but they are just way too expensive. I was even going to try and sneak in a 40GB SSD just for the OS but ended up cutting it due to budget reason. And I don't need a 1TB internal drive because I have an external one right now.
5) PSU: I know 750W is overkill for those specs I listed but I just wanted to make sure I had enough for another GTX 560 Ti if I did go the SLI route and when I overclock the CPU to 4GHz.
I would really appreciate it if anyone could comment if the hardware I picked out would work without issue. Any suggestions or comments are appreciated. Like I said, this would be my first build so I want to make sure I do it right. I have already learned a lot about hardware over the past few weeks.
Laekon said:Is there a way to decide between the 560 GTX and the 6950 1GB? At this point in time it doesn't seem wise to get a 460 GTX for a 1920 x 1080 monitor when these cards are just a little more.
Flying_Phoenix said:"Soon" better be like fucking tomorrow at midnight.
Yupdamn that's nice said:Is it ok to ask for help with trouble-shooting a new build in this thread?
damn that's nice said:Is it ok to ask for help with trouble-shooting a new build in this thread?
MikeE21286 said:I bought my ASUS Pro board at microcenter...if I go there will they just replace the board for me and give me a B3 version? That's all I really want...
no box either.Flying_Phoenix said:New "Shellshocker'.
When it says "bare drive" does it mean that it only comes with the drive and no cables?
Personally, for the price you are looking at, I would go with IPS panel monitor instead, like Dell UltraSharp U2311H. IPS monitors are fine for gaming, and once you get one, you'll never go back to anything else.ASilva said:So, after being a console gamer for the past years (i only own a macbook pro) i've decided to return to PC Gaming. I've been researching alot for the past few weeks and came up with this setup:
Monitor: Samsung XL2370
Case: CM 690 II
Processor: intel i5 2500k
Cooler: CM Hyper 212+
Memory: GSkill 4+4Gb Ripjaw X 1600Mhz (CL7)
GPU: EVGA GTX570
HDD: Samsung F3 1Tb
Drive: Samsung SH-S223
PSU: Corsair TX-750 / HX-750
As for the motherboard i'm waiting for one of the new revised ASUS Sandy Bridge boards.
Any suggestions on the setup?
I'm planing on OC the processor to at least 4Ghz and probably more depending on the results i get with that cooler.
The difference in price between the TX-750 and HX-750 is not that much so i will probably go for the HX for the convenience.
Where? I'm waiting to see Asus and Gigabytes offerings instead of just pulling the trigger right away on the MSI out.JWong said:Man, I just saw a slew of new Asus LG1155 mobos on listing. This is gonna make choices a lot harder.
knitoe said:Personally, for the price you are looking at, I would go with IPS panel monitor instead, like Dell UltraSharp U2311H. IPS monitors are fine for gaming, and once you get one, you'll never go back to anything else.
Edit: Make sure the ram runs at 1.5V. Some people experience problems running ram voltage above that on sandy bridge MBs.
If you don't care about image quality and all you do is gaming, the TN (2ms) monitor will be the better option, but all purpose, IPS panels are much better. I game fine on IPS monitor.ASilva said:Thanks for the input. The Dell U2311H is even cheaper than the XL2370 but it isn't LED and has 8ms response time (against the 2ms of the XL2370). Isn't that bad?
Also, the Dell only has 1 DVI connection and i would really like to have DVI and HDMI (already have a mini displayport > HDMI connector for my macbook pro)
But anyway, if the Dell is better i will go for it
As for the RAM, it runs at 1.6V :/
If that is really a problem should i go for:
GSKILL KIT 8GB DDR3 1333MHZ RIPJAW X (CL7) (MEMORY TIMINGS 7-7-7-21-2N)
or
GSKILL KIT 8GB DDR3 1333MHZ RIPJAW X (CL7) (MEMORY TIMINGS 9-9-9-24-2N)
These run both at 1.5V
http://techreport.com/articles.x/20377/3ASilva said:Thanks again, I didn't copy the ram specifications correctly on the last post (edited now) so, for roughly the same price should i go with 1600Mhz CL9 or 1333Mhz CL7?
Revengeance said:Hey guys, I'm looking for a laptop recommendation, here are my requirements:
- sub $1,200
- can play lots of games (although honestly, it'll really mostly be used as a portable Starcraft 2 machine)
- less than 15 inches
- not super ugly, since it will be used for work occasionally as well
Right now I'm looking at HP Envy and Dell XPS. Which gets the gaf seal of approval, and are there any others I might be overlooking?
Dreams-Visions said:no box either.
caliblue15 said:Another reason to get a SSD.
http://img854.imageshack.us/img854/4421/harddrive.png
Or this..................
http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/9542/ssdof.png
mkenyon said:6950 2GB is the fav right now because you can flash it to a 6970.
Mattdaddy said:Wow any potential consequences to this?
ChRoNiTe said:
Kenka said:It looks fine but isn't it a bit expensive ?
Kenka said:It looks fine but isn't it a bit expensive ?
mkenyon said:Not any more than tinkering with any part in a computer.