• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

"I need a New PC!" 2011 Edition of SSD's for everyone! |OT|

Status
Not open for further replies.

Raistlin

Post Count: 9999
Corky said:
Question :

Which company's gaming gpus are best suited for CAD/solidworks ? (i.e excluding firepro/quadro )
You excluded the only cards that are quantifiably better suited to my knowledge.


For consumer cards, check if the particular SW you will be using has any sort of preference. For example, if you have something that utilizes CUDA (and reviews say there is merit to its use), then go nVidia. Otherwise it doesn't matter. Just get a card that has the performance and warranty you require.
 

Funky Papa

FUNK-Y-PPA-4
Hazaro said:
Unless you got some good deal on the GS700W (Like a Best Buy discount) I'd try to get a TX or Seasonic unit. It's still fine, but not on part with the rest of the higher quality PSU line up. Especially with the rest of your parts, I'd spend a bit more for a V2 PSU or a Seasonic 520w if you are running 1 card.
*feist covered a lot of when when I was watching TSL.
Really? I just want something silent that could also take a bigger video card should the need arose.
 
Some one posted that hey were going from a P4 3.2GHz to an i5 2500K. Even going up to a dual core 1155 is a big upgrade, let alone a quad.


Fixed2BeBroken said:
thanks, this is super helpful...I am gonna tweak my stuff slightly with what u posted and post it later tonight. with that said....the psu im buying is cheaper than all the ones you posted.
The XFXs cost less, you'd just have to use rebates. The Antec TP 650 would be the best out of the three options I posted and the EarthWatts you're looking at.


Case wise, you may also be interested in these in the $100 or less range.
Videos, pricing, pics & reviews

Rosewill Blackhawk
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=26654154&postcount=10120

NZXT H2
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=26643604&postcount=10072


Funky Papa said:
Really? I just want something silent that could also take a bigger video card should the need arose.
Like he said, the GS-series isn't bad, just not as good as some other options.
 

Killer

Banned
I would like some from fellow Gaffers to build me a new pc. This what i have in my mind at the moment:

Processor: i7 2600k
Motheboard:ASUS P8P67 DELUXE (REV 3.0) LGA 1155 Intel P67 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX
RAM:CORSAIR Vengeance 8GB (2 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600
GPU:EVGA SuperClocked GeForce GTX 570 (Fermi) 1280MB 320-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP
HDD: Crucial C-300 SSD 64 gb.

What you guys think? is there anything to add or replace? I know I'm missing power supply so recommend what you think is good.
 
Is it bad idea to have a 1080p monitor when you dont have a beast computer since playing any game at any resolution other than your Monitors res will look uncrisp? Gaming at 1080p still require too much hardware power?
 

Schlep

Member
Killer said:
I would like some from fellow Gaffers to build me a new pc. This what i have in my mind at the moment:

Processor: i7 2600k
Motheboard:ASUS P8P67 DELUXE (REV 3.0) LGA 1155 Intel P67 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX
RAM:CORSAIR Vengeance 8GB (2 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600
GPU:EVGA SuperClocked GeForce GTX 570 (Fermi) 1280MB 320-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP
HDD: Crucial C-300 SSD 64 gb.

What you guys think? is there anything to add or replace? I know I'm missing power supply so recommend what you think is good.
I'd take the $75-100 out of the 2600k (down to 2500k), and put that into a regular HDD or up the Crucial to 128gb.
 

Rufus

Member
momolicious said:
Is it bad idea to have a 1080p monitor when you dont have a beast computer since playing any game at any resolution other than your Monitors res will look uncrisp? Gaming at 1080p still require too much hardware power?
No, not at all. You only need a 'beast rig' if you go much higher than that, possibly with multiple monitors. If you're a complete whore about frame rate and want absolutely everything to run at least at 60fps, you're going to need more power (for the Crysis 2s and Metro 2033s out there), but aside from that... An average rig will handle 1080p just fine.

I have a 1080p monitor with a ADM X3 720 @3.2GHz (very mild OC, stock is 2.8GHz), 4GB RAM and a 4890. I'm content and will be until Battlefield 3 hits, I think. Possibly far beyond that, considering console ports won't start to suddenly give my system any trouble.
 
Crysis 2 just revealed how massively bottlenecked my 560 is, but then i realised i've had this core 2 duo for 4 years now That's well over due for my usual system overhaul.

Why do you guys suggest, is sandy bridge the gaming cpu to go for these days, any idea if AMD will pull their socks up any time soon? I'm also looking at 8gigs of ram to future proof it considering how dirt cheap ram is these days.
 

JRW

Member
TheExodu5 said:
That's interesting to note. I didn't know they made such small PVA displays anymore. While they do have more ghosting for gaming (though no more than an IPS panel), the deep blacks make them look amazing compared to most other monitors.

I would think it would look really good next to the PX2370. I bought two of those monitors at one point, and they had some of the worst black levels I had ever seen on a PC monitor.

Ever since I downloaded a calibrated ICC profile for my PX2370 it looks better than it did out of the box. The black levels are definitely better on the 2333T but when viewing a solid black screen its not a huge difference like I thought it might be. They both still have a bit of a "glow". (It's worth noting I have a Kuro plasma in the same room so im a bit spoiled by what extreme deep black levels look like lol)

One area the 2333T really shines is shadow details, while looking at photo's and wallpapers in Clone mode I was noticing details that I cant make out on the PX no matter how I adjust it, also the PX's backlight bleed sometimes makes shadow details even more difficult to make out, the 2333T has very little backlight bleed in comparison and its not even bad enough to affect details.

Although the 2333T looked better most the time the PX's colors are more accurate, I havent been able to find an ICC profile for the 2333T but Ive been researching hardware calibrators.
 

Killer

Banned
Schlep said:
I'd take the $75-100 out of the 2600k (down to 2500k), and put that into a regular HDD or up the Crucial to 128gb.

Is there a big downgrade in the performance in doing so? Besides, I really don't know how to overclock a gpu and cpu so i don't know if the graphics card that i chose is a good one.
 

ExMachina

Unconfirmed Member
Killer said:
Is there a big downgrade in the performance in doing so? Besides, I really don't know how to overclock a gpu and cpu so i don't know if the graphics card that i chose is a good one.
No downgrade at all for the purpose of gaming. The only major difference is that the 2600k has hyper threading and the 2500k does not. You'll only need hyper threading if you do CPU-intensive tasks that make use of multiple cores (such as video editing/encoding).
 

Killer

Banned
ExMachina said:
No downgrade at all for the purpose of gaming. The only major difference is that the 2600k has hyper threading and the 2500k does not. You'll only need hyper threading if you do CPU-intensive tasks that make use of multiple cores (such as video editing/encoding).

Cool. I'll take the 2500k then :).

Can anyone help me with the graphics card? in 300-400$ range but i want a stable one. Same thing for the HDD. What do you guys recommend for a 2 tb hard disk? I'm planning on getting crucial ssd 64 gb as OS harddisk but i don't know what to get for the other harddisk.
 

Vyer

Member
New build done, finished last night. Realized today it's been about 7 years since I actually last buit a system.

Anyhow, everything running smoothly so far. Will do some additional upgrades down the line, but really happy with it so far.

I picked up the ASUS P67 board. The MB CD came with Asus' AI Tools. You guys recommend installing that or just leave it alone?
 

bigace33

Member
TheExodu5 said:
You'd need to look inside the case. There should be a label on the power supply that tells you the wattage and amperage on each rail. We'd need to make sure it's a standard ATX power supply (probably is), and then you could replace it. You could get the 520W Seasonic PSU in the OP for $75, and a Radeon 6850 for around $160. That would be a pretty marked upgrade.

Let us know what you're willing to spend, and we can adjust it from there.
Thanks for the quick reply. The prices you gave sounds very reasonable. So the 6850 over the 460? I saw a 1GB 460 for like $139.00. If the 6850 is a much better card I might as well go the extra mile and get that. Also a very serious noob question. I can just go to the store and purchase any brand card and it'll fit my Mobo? Or are cards made specific for HP, Dell..etc,etc?
 

TheExodu5

Banned
bigace33 said:
Thanks for the quick reply. The prices you gave sounds very reasonable. So the 6850 over the 460? I saw a 1GB 460 for like $139.00. If the 6850 is a much better card I might as well go the extra mile and get that.

They're pretty equivalent. If you get the 1GB 460, make sure it's not the SE, as it's much slower.
 

Wallach

Member
Not to cross post, but in case anyone is interested my current build is going up for sale in the B/S/T thread. Not sure a lot of people look over there for PC stuff.
 

scogoth

Member
bigace33 said:
What I was trying to ask in post 10666 is are video cards universal? Will they fit any mobo ?

Short answer. Yes.

Long answer. Yes if you have an available pcie slot and the case will fit the card. Unless you have a 6990 or a gtx 590 or are using a mini-itx case or htpc case I wouldn't worry about it.
 
·feist· said:
Some one posted that hey were going from a P4 3.2GHz to an i5 2500K. Even going up to a dual core 1155 is a big upgrade, let alone a quad.


The XFXs cost less, you'd just have to use rebates. The Antec TP 650 would be the best out of the three options I posted and the EarthWatts you're looking at.


Case wise, you may also be interested in these in the $100 or less range.
Videos, pricing, pics & reviews

Rosewill Blackhawk
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=26654154&postcount=10120

NZXT H2
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=26643604&postcount=10072


Like he said, the GS-series isn't bad, just not as good as some other options.
Those cases are cool but he case im lookong for is one with a window on the side that is also a mid sized tower. Any recommendations?
 

Hawk269

Member
Hello my fellow PC Maniacs!

I recently got into the PC scene, actually last August a friend built a rig for me that many of you provided input and some great advice. Since then, I have been tinkering, updating etc. Today, I find myself purchasing newer components, faster processors, better memory etc. I feel like an addict in the pursuit of more power and better tech. I have been a console gamer all my life, I am in my mid-40's and enjoy gaming. I once was big time into the PC scene back in that Atari ST days, even running my own BBS. Even back then, wanting to tinker and upgrade from a 10gig HDD to a massive 20gig HDD was a big jump back in the day.

Anyways, as I enter the PC scene once again, I find myself wanting even more and more upgrades and more and more power ot of the rig. My main gaming resolution is 1080p and I game on my 60" HDTV. It is really f'n great, but even having a mighty 580 GPU, I still have the need for more power. To me and maybe to some of you that are reading this, when I see a graphic slider and I cant put it at the max due to it causing less framerate, I immediately want to do something about it.

I have been told by some here that adding a second 580 is overkill since I game only at 1080p. Well that is good and fine if every game I played would stay at 60FPS with every slider set to max, but the reality is that with some games it is not enough. For example, Crysis 2, which I get an average of about 56-58 FPS is nothing to sneeze at as at that frame rate at 1080p it is hard disern the few times it dips to to 56 from the constant 60fps. This is with everything set to max from the game settings. However, Crysis 2 is a DX9 title as of right now and a DX11 patch will be coming. Just based on assumption, I would think I would dip to mid 40's with DX11. My reasoning is Metro 2033 which kicks booty with DX9, but go DX11 and you do the bench marks, I hover around 44 or so, with several areas dipping to much lower than that.

This all with games that are out now or came out a bit ago. What will happen in the next 6 months with some high profile games coming out? I dont agree with the saying that gamers that play at 1080p adding more GPU power is overkill. If current games out now cant sustain 60FPS with the most powerfull single GPU card with DX11, then more power is definately needed if a user wants to go max settings and hit 60fps.

As I wrap this up, one of the points of my post is to ask some of you more experienced, long term PC enthusiasts, how and when do you draw the line at enough is enough? At what point do you say "I can live with not being able to run at max?". I feel like a addict addicted to some drug, but this drug only causes me to spend money in return for better visual fidelity, that ability to move that slider closer and closer to the max setting, the ability to hit that magical 60fps constant frame rate. I guess, I can look at this as any other hobby where the cost factor is impacted in the pursuit for better/faster performance. I guess it could be applied to how people buy new HDTV's since they want the better one that is coming or the R/C Car builder that is constantly buying new components to make it faster and better.

Do I need help?
 

EMBee99

all that he wants is another baby
Wanted to throw out a hearty thanks to those in this thread. Finished my very first build last night (Fractal R3, 2500k, GTX 570, 8gb) and probably would never have considered it if it wasn't for the supportive and informative folks in this thread (you know who you are).

Build took about an hour, was playing Crysis 2 in glorious Extreme mode by the morning. I don't think I'll look to a console again if I have a choice now. Simply awesome.

That said, I still have an itch to use a gamepad for certain titles (Batman: AA especially). Is the Xbox 360 controller the best bet? I tried to sync my spare PS3 DS this morning and didn't really get it up to snuff.

Again, many thanks to the vocal proponents of PC gaming and construction on the forum. You're doing a great job.
 
Fixed2BeBroken said:
Those cases are cool but he case im lookong for is one with a window on the side that is also a mid sized tower. Any recommendations?
Some of the OP options meet that criteria.
The Rosewill Blackhawk actually has a window cut-out. Just isn't a large one. Since your original pick was ~$100, I tried to keep it in that range or lower.

$90 - Lian Li Lancool PC-K62 ($100 - $10 off promo code EMCKGHF32)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4XCT9yibwQ&feature=player_embedded
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811112239&Tpk=pc-k62
31i5mlk1IjL._SL500_AA300_.jpg
31A5zLDn2YL._AA300_.jpg


There's a newer version, but the PC-K62 is a great case and costs less. For a bit more than $100...

$160 - SilverStone RV02B-W
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFmbodtTq1o
http://www.amazon.com/dp/SILVERSTON/?tag=neogaf0e-20
41XXRQVNhyL._SL500_AA300_.jpg
41s2Yf6saAL._AA300_.jpg
 
EMBee99 said:
Build took about an hour, was playing Crysis 2 in glorious Extreme mode by the morning. I don't think I'll look to a console again if I have a choice now. Simply awesome.

Unfortunately with the vast number of console-exclusive games, you can't throw your consoles away. I have my fire-breathing PC, but I also have a 360, PS3, and a Wii. I regret buying the Wii since I never turn it on but my 360 and PS3 get regular use due to a steady stream of titles which will never see the light of day on PC.

There are even some titles which are available on PC I still prefer to play on console, for example the Mass Effect series since I played ME1 way back when it was a 360-exclusive release and I've been carrying my Shepard over since then, so I'm locked to my 360 for those games.

That said, I still have an itch to use a gamepad for certain titles (Batman: AA especially). Is the Xbox 360 controller the best bet? I tried to sync my spare PS3 DS this morning and didn't really get it up to snuff.

http://www.motioninjoy.com/
 

InertiaXr

Member
Does anybody think there will be a sweet spot for buying a SSD in the near future, much like when Sandy Bridge recently came out? I feel like a 128GB SSD would be the biggest under $150-200 upgrade I could do.
 

Erebus

Member
EMBee99 said:
Wanted to throw out a hearty thanks to those in this thread. Finished my very first build last night (Fractal R3, 2500k, GTX 570, 8gb) and probably would never have considered it if it wasn't for the supportive and informative folks in this thread (you know who you are).

Build took about an hour, was playing Crysis 2 in glorious Extreme mode by the morning. I don't think I'll look to a console again if I have a choice now. Simply awesome.

That said, I still have an itch to use a gamepad for certain titles (Batman: AA especially). Is the Xbox 360 controller the best bet? I tried to sync my spare PS3 DS this morning and didn't really get it up to snuff.

Again, many thanks to the vocal proponents of PC gaming and construction on the forum. You're doing a great job.
Except for FPS games, I use a wired Xbox 360 controller for everything else on PC. I never had any problem so far.
 
InertiaXr said:
Does anybody think there will be a sweet spot for buying a SSD in the near future, much like when Sandy Bridge recently came out? I feel like a 128GB SSD would be the biggest under $150-200 upgrade I could do.

If you want to keep your OS, your applications, and your games directory on the SSD without having to constantly uninstall and reinstall games you are playing, you should be looking at a minimum 256GB SSD. Currently my Steam directory is 186GB by itself and so if I actually got an SSD and actually wanted to keep my Steam directory on it I would be looking at a 512GB SSD, which is so crazy expensive that basically if I got an SSD right now I wouldn't be able to keep my Steam directory on it. It's too bad Steam doesn't support splitting your Steam directory so you could keep your frequently played games on an SSD and others on a regular HDD.
 

LegoDad

Member
Unknown Soldier said:
If you want to keep your OS, your applications, and your games directory on the SSD without having to constantly uninstall and reinstall games you are playing, you should be looking at a minimum 256GB SSD. Currently my Steam directory is 186GB by itself and so if I actually got an SSD and actually wanted to keep my Steam directory on it I would be looking at a 512GB SSD, which is so crazy expensive that basically if I got an SSD right now I wouldn't be able to keep my Steam directory on it. It's too bad Steam doesn't support splitting your Steam directory so you could keep your frequently played games on an SSD and others on a regular HDD.

just put steam in a 1TB HDD, there isn't any speed difference by running the games off the SSD.
 

InertiaXr

Member
caliblue15 said:
just put steam in a 1TB HDD, there isn't any speed difference by running the games off the SSD.

So if programs don't benefit from being on an SSD vs a HDD, why would I ever want a SSD over 13.9GB (my w7 install)? This seems contradictory to everything I've read and heard about an SSD, that loading and running of all games/programs are improved significantly.
 

Hazaro

relies on auto-aim
Hawk269 said:
Hello my fellow PC Maniacs!

Anyways, as I enter the PC scene once again, I find myself wanting even more and more upgrades and more and more power ot of the rig. My main gaming resolution is 1080p and I game on my 60" HDTV. It is really f'n great, but even having a mighty 580 GPU, I still have the need for more power. To me and maybe to some of you that are reading this, when I see a graphic slider and I cant put it at the max due to it causing less framerate, I immediately want to do something about it.

Do I need help?
Nah, it's just a phase. Just try to think a little bit before you start overvolting and running a water chiller 24/7.

I was super big into tweaking and overclocking (within reasonable bounds), but I eventually settled out of it since I am poor and I almost killed my computer.

If you add a second 580 because you don't want to deal with hassle or tweaking down the line that is perfectly fine imo. Just get some nice coolers for them and add a few 1500rpm Scythe Kama's for case airflow.
Up PSU to a 1000W in case you want to start tweaking around.
 

LegoDad

Member
InertiaXr said:
So if programs don't benefit from being on an SSD vs a HDD, why would I ever want a SSD over 13.9GB (my w7 install)? This seems contradictory to everything I've read and heard about an SSD, that loading and running of all games/programs are improved significantly.

Because the operating system running off the OS makes a HUGE difference, it's what makes everything run. You'll see an increase in speed for loading of games, but it isn't beneficial enough to for me to justify a huge SSD. Also most games have an online mode and you still have to wait for everyone else to load so no benefit.
 

Hazaro

relies on auto-aim
InertiaXr said:
So if programs don't benefit from being on an SSD vs a HDD, why would I ever want a SSD over 13.9GB (my w7 install)? This seems contradictory to everything I've read and heard about an SSD, that loading and running of all games/programs are improved significantly.
Game loading specifically isn't a big improvement since most game files are a large chuck of data. It's mostly not worth it for size of an SSD.

However all those <200MB programs on your computer will now launch instantly and be amazing. Of course if you do put an MMO or any game on an SSD you will most likely see improved load times, just nothing mind blowing.
 
Crucial M4/Micron C400 reviews, specs and benches
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=26653280&postcount=10118
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=26687156&postcount=10303
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=26688710&postcount=10321

Another 256GB review:

Crucial's m4 solid-state drive - The RealSSD rides again
by Geoff Gasior — 3:57 PM on March 24, 2011

http://techreport.com/articles.x/20646
C400_08.jpg



Here's a review for the smaller sized units:

C400_06.jpg


Crucial RealSSD M4 64GB (Micron RealSSD C400 64GB)
http://www.expreview.com/14474-1.html

Comparison.png


ATTO Disk Benchmark
http://www.expreview.com/14474-4.html
Crystal Disk Mark
http://www.expreview.com/14474-5.html
HD Tune Pro
http://www.expreview.com/14474-6.html
HD Tach RW
http://www.expreview.com/14474-7.html
AS SSD Benchmark
http://www.expreview.com/14474-8.html
IOmeter
http://www.expreview.com/14474-9.html
Conclusion
http://www.expreview.com/14474-10.html

ATTO_01.png
cdm_01.png
 

InertiaXr

Member
Hazaro said:
Game loading specifically isn't a big improvement since most game files are a large chuck of data. It's mostly not worth it for size of an SSD.

However all those <200MB programs on your computer will now launch instantly and be amazing. Of course if you do put an MMO or any game on an SSD you will most likely see improved load times, just nothing mind blowing.

Sounds like an SSD isn't a good choice for me at least right now then. I never use anything in large amounts besides firefox and steam/games on my computer right now.
 

LegoDad

Member
InertiaXr said:
Sounds like an SSD isn't a good choice for me at least right now then. I never use anything in large amounts besides firefox and steam/games on my computer right now.

Your entire system will run faster, it runs your operating system, which everything else runs off of....

I could never go back to a HDD, 25 sec startup time, instant loading of programs, it's bliss.
 

knitoe

Member
Hazaro said:
I just want SSD prices to go down.
Don't really care about speed so much.
Don't see it happening anytime soon. New SSDs will just take the price point of old version even though they are supposely cheaper to manufacture, ie going from 34nm to 25nm chips.
 

LegoDad

Member
knitoe said:
Don't see it happening anytime soon. New SSDs will just take the price point of old version even though they are supposely cheaper to manufacture, ie going from 34nm to 25nm chips.

I see them milking the market as long as they can.
 

Vyer

Member
I figure next year I'll be ready to make the upgrade to SSD. If not later this year.

A little off topic, but has there ever been a general PC games thread, recommendations and such? lol. After (generally) not playing them for about 5 years I want to know what gems I might have missed.
 

Slavik81

Member
I picked up a Crucial C300 on sale. The two things I've loved about it are:
StarCraft 2 launches way faster. Like, in a quarter of the time it takes from my hard drive.

Steam is vastly more responsive and loads a bazillion times faster. For reasons that are not entirely clear to me, Steam uses an incredible amount of data from the hard drive. The improvement is particularly noticeable during startup or after a reboot because the UI doesn't freeze up while it tries to load GUI data off the HDD that's spinning up.
 

Wag

Member
Ordered all the parts for my new PC:

Rosewill Thor ATX Full Tower (it's HUGE)
ASRock P67 Extreme4 B3 motherboard
i7-2600K
Antec HCP-1200 PS
Two MSI 2GB 6950s (Crossfire), with intent to buy a third later
Patriot Gamer 2 8GB (2x4GB) DDR3 1600
CoolerMaster Hyper 212 Plus Heatsync/Fan

:)
 

TheExodu5

Banned
Wag said:
Ordered all the parts for my new PC:

Rosewill Thor ATX Full Tower (it's HUGE)
ASRock P67 Extreme4 B3 motherboard
i7-2600K
Antec HCP-1200 PS
Two MSI 2GB 5970s (Crossfire), with intent to buy a third later
Patriot Gamer 2 8GB (2x4GB) DDR3 1600
CoolerMaster Hyper 212 Plus Heatsync/Fan

:)

I'm not so sure that's the best idea. Unless you meant 6970?
 

Cipherr

Member
It really doesnt seem like its worth it for me to buy a c400 128GB over the c300 128GB I have now. There are speed increases, but not nearly enough to warrant the cost, and then the hassle of selling my current drive.

Should probably just get a SB board and a 2600k instead. Even thats not an extraordinary jump from a 4GHZ I7-950 but I think I would get a bigger performance boost from that than I would from jumping from a c300 to a c400.
 

TheExodu5

Banned
Cipherr said:
It really doesnt seem like its worth it for me to buy a c400 128GB over the c300 128GB I have now. There are speed increases, but not nearly enough to warrant the cost, and then the hassle of selling my current drive.

Should probably just get a SB board and a 2600k instead. Even thats not an extraordinary jump from a 4GHZ I7-950 but I think I would get a bigger performance boost from that than I would from jumping from a c300 to a c400.

Definitely...though I even wouldn't do that CPU upgrade at this point. It might be worth it if you're having trouble emulating some titles, but otherwise, the 950 won't stop you from doing anything. I'd wait for 8 core CPUs before making the leap.
 
Wag said:
Ordered all the parts for my new PC:

Rosewill Thor ATX Full Tower (it's HUGE)
ASRock P67 Extreme4 B3 motherboard
i7-2600K
Antec HCP-1200 PS
Two MSI 2GB 6950s (Crossfire), with intent to buy a third later
Patriot Gamer 2 8GB (2x4GB) DDR3 1600
CoolerMaster Hyper 212 Plus Heatsync/Fan

:)
An Antec HCP-1200 to run two modified 6950s?

SeaSonic X750
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817151087&Tpk=x750

SeaSonic X760
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817151103&Tpk=x760

Corsair AX750
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817139016&Tpk=ax 750

Corsair AX850
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817139015&Tpk=ax850

The SS X850 costs too much, and the Corsair AX850 is only $3 more expensive (after rebate) than the AX750. Hell, you could go with a Gold or Platinum 650w.


edit:
Looks like I quoted you, after you edited out your original 5970x2, and don't recall seeing the potential option for a 3rd GPU.

In that case, this is $30 less, is one of the best on the market, and has a longer warranty than the Antec (though 1200w is still overkill for your potential needs).

Corsair AX1200
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817139014&Tpk=ax1200
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom