scogoth said:At load? How much dust was there?
I understand that for internet surfing or word it isn't going to make a difference. Games, depends on the game, as well as when (if you are building a future-proof machine)Well that's understandable then. But surely you must understand that to anyone browsing and gaming, added RAM will have no impact on their system's performance whatsoever.
mcrae said:it was at 99 after playing sc2 for an hour or two with the fans on low and finishing with a big intesive custom map, then was off for ~10 minutes, then was 43ish when i turned it on with fans on high, and settled down to 35ish.
not ive overclocked it from 2.66 to a hefty 2.70 and its sitting at 50.... this after spending the past hour and a half fucking around with settings that dont work... yeah i give up lol
element said:I understand that for internet surfing or word it isn't going to make a difference. Games, depends on the game, as well as when (if you are building a future-proof machine)
scogoth said:Your heatsink is not put on properly, I would suggest cheaping out on lunch tomorrow and buy a Hyper 212+. Then you should be able to OC to 4.5GHz pretty easy.
mcrae said:hmm i remember being pretty meticulous when putting it on... the paste i used was some really random cheap crap i got from a tiny computer store, though i think i remember reading that that generally shouldnt matter..
ah well, that sink is in stock and only 30$ so ill pink one up tomorrow, does the type/brand of thermal paste matter at all?
And you don't expect this to change?scogoth said:Not really almost all games still run 32-bit binaries and can't use more then 3GB of ram anyways. Even if they could they wouldn't use more because they don't want to make system requirements so high.
element said:And you don't expect this to change?
scogoth said:Ummmm stock cooler comes with paste already applied, maybe that was the problem. And the Hyper 212+ comes with paste thats just fine.
Anyone notice mouselag when VSYNC in games is turned on?
God dammit why did I even come in this thread all it makes me want to do is spend money
Why didn't you go with 2600K instead of a 2500K?element said:I work in Premiere and After Effects. More RAM!!
Considering many people on here are buying rigs for the first time in years, they build somewhat future proof machines. Just because something doesn't use it today doesn't mean that nothing will in the future. If your spending $1500+ on a new machine, spend the extra $80 to get more RAM.
and various people in this thread are buying their first PC in five years... Which is my point.scogoth said:Not in the next 2 years no.
Wanted to stay below $500 for my upgrade.Why didn't you go with 2600K instead of 2500K?
But, difference is only about $90. If you want to future proof...element said:Wanted to stay below $500 for my upgrade.
element said:Wanted to stay below $500 for my upgrade.
future proof isn't huge to me. going from C2D e7300 to i2500k is a nice enough jump for me.knitoe said:But, difference is only about $90. If you want to future proof...
In the middle of a project.Could have spend that extra RAM money for a 2600k.
Does not compute.
element said:future proof isn't huge to me. going from C2D e7300 to i2500k is a nice enough jump for me.
element said:Considering many people on here are buying rigs for the first time in years, they build somewhat future proof machines. Just because something doesn't use it today doesn't mean that nothing will in the future. If your spending $1500+ on a new machine, spend the extra $80 to get more RAM.
Price range? If he wants best for work, would need to look into a Intel Core i7 990X, 24GB ram DDR3, GeForce GTX 590 (for CUDA) and etc.Hawk269 said:Hey guys. A family member needs held\p deciding on a CPU/GPU combo for his work needs. He landed a job doing 3D modeling for a game company and needs a new computer to do this modeling and the rendering of the work he is doing at home. What would be the best GPU/CPU combo for this use? I am sure he will do some gaming, but 90% of the time it will be used to do rendering/modeling etc. I know one of the programs he is using is Maya and 1 or 2 others that I cant remember the names.
Thanks in advance for any input. I haven no system specs since he is building the new rig and just started looking into parts.
yeah that is a loaded question. budget is always the most important thing when building a computer. set a budget, then you can start to decide on what parts would be best for the task it is being built for.Hawk269 said:Hey guys. A family member needs held\p deciding on a CPU/GPU combo for his work needs. He landed a job doing 3D modeling for a game company and needs a new computer to do this modeling and the rendering of the work he is doing at home. What would be the best GPU/CPU combo for this use? I am sure he will do some gaming, but 90% of the time it will be used to do rendering/modeling etc. I know one of the programs he is using is Maya and 1 or 2 others that I cant remember the names.
Thanks in advance for any input. I haven no system specs since he is building the new rig and just started looking into parts.
we don't even build machines like that at game companies...would need to look into a Intel Core i7 990X, 24GB ram DDR3, GeForce GTX 590 (for CUDA) and etc.
element said:and various people in this thread are buying their first PC in five years... Which is my point.
element said:the 5% increase in speed vs 2500k/2600k wasn't worth it to me.
I tend to have a rule about hardware. I always buy middle tier hardware. My last mobo/cpu combo was $150. I buy cheap. I don't need bleeding edge. I also could spend the $100 on hookers and blow.
knitoe said:Price range? If he wants best for work, would need to look into a Intel Core i7 990X, 24GB ram DDR3, GeForce GTX 590 (for CUDA) and etc.
knitoe said:Price range? If he wants best for work, would need to look into a Intel Core i7 990X, 24GB ram DDR3, GeForce GTX 590 (for CUDA) and etc.
Hawk269 said:Price range is pretty much anything he needs to get something that would work well for him. Would the 2600k be good or would the 990x be much better for him?
element said:I work in Premiere and After Effects. More RAM!!
Considering many people on here are buying rigs for the first time in years, they build somewhat future proof machines. Just because something doesn't use it today doesn't mean that nothing will in the future. If your spending $1500+ on a new machine, spend the extra $80 to get more RAM.
The 990X would be much better, but the question is if it's worth paying $690 more. And, since price doesn't seem to be any issue, I would say yes for someone needing that extra power for 90% of the time.Hawk269 said:Price range is pretty much anything he needs to get something that would work well for him. Would the 2600k be good or would the 990x be much better for him?
Can't really game on them.scogoth said:Lol might as well get a tesla gpu for CUDA.
scogoth said:990x + 590GTX is already $2000 after tax. If he's serious about a modelling machine he should be going for a westmere workstation processor and telsa GPUs for cuda. Or get a $1500 comp with 2600k and a 580 and just wait longer for render times.
Hawk269 said:Well the one build he did on newegg was a 2600k, dual 580's, 16gigs of ram. He also had 2 monitors and bunch of other stuff. He is holding off for a day or two just cause he is not sure if what he is buying would be good for what he is doing. He is fairly new at computers, but is an amazing artist which is what got him the job. He just needs it to do work at home, while away from work. I dont want him wasting money if it will not do what he wants, but I would think what he has so far is pretty beefy?
MikeTyson said:Hey guys, I have a friend of a friend who wants to trade me his computer unit for my PS3 and all my games - guess what I am trying to ask here is, would this be a fair trade for me. Here's the specs he has on it;
Amd phenom II x4 955
Asus M4A89GTD Pro/USB3 mobo xfire enabled
4 gig GSkill ripjaws ram ddr3 1600
Gigabyte HD6850
250gb seagate hdd
1tb seagate hdd
Coolermaster 460w psu
Antec 300 case
W7
I don't have knowledge on the whole processors/motherboards/graphics cards stuff like that =3
Really? 14 games, phat PS3 originally 80GB 2usb put in 320hd.AwesomeSauce said:That's a really good computer actually, but how many games are you trading with the ps3? Also which ps3 phat or slim?
MikeTyson said:Hey guys, I have a friend of a friend who wants to trade me his computer unit for my PS3 and all my games - guess what I am trying to ask here is, would this be a fair trade for me. Here's the specs he has on it;
Amd phenom II x4 955
Asus M4A89GTD Pro/USB3 mobo xfire enabled
4 gig GSkill ripjaws ram ddr3 1600
Gigabyte HD6850
250gb seagate hdd
1tb seagate hdd
Coolermaster 460w psu
Antec 300 case
W7
I don't have knowledge on the whole processors/motherboards/graphics cards stuff like that =3
MikeTyson said:Really? 14 games, phat PS3 originally 80GB 2usb put in 320hd.
Omiee said:do it, the phat has a high chanse of dying anyway i think.
but that pc is pretty good, you could sell the graphics card and go for a 5770 and have a realy nice pc.
iv had that cpu and its pretty good. actually i had the 965 but still, its a really good cpu.
MikeTyson said:Really? 14 games, phat PS3 originally 80GB 2usb put in 320hd.
scogoth said:So $300 + (14 * $50) = $1000. Comps not really worth $1000 but if you're done with your PS3 and want to get into PC gaming its not a terrible trade.
element said:And you don't expect this to change?
scogoth said:990x + 590GTX is already $2000 after tax. If he's serious about a modelling machine he should be going for a westmere workstation processor and telsa GPUs for cuda. Or get a $1500 comp with 2600k and a 580 and just wait longer for render times.
EDIT: In all seriousness your friend should buy a built workstation with warrenty coverage, service and support. Dell makes great workstations but proper hardware is in the order of $5,000-$15,000 for 3D modelling workstations.
·feist· said:Samsung's HDD division may be purchased by Seagate.
Awful, awful news.
Samsung Seeks to Unload Hard-Disk-Drive Business
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704613504576268573695939638.html
TheExodu5 said:I agree with you here.
Get your friend to do some research into workstation setups first. Honestly, not many of us here are knowledgeable about this.
I mean, certainly a consumer level PC can be put together with some amazing performance. I'm just not sure how crucial it is for him to get workstation grade components instead.
Zaptruder said:You can use consumer graphics cards with hacked CUDA drivers if you want CUDA support.
Yeah think I'll gun it, and do the trade. Been wanting to get into PC Gaming. Selected titles I want on PC.Omiee said:do it, the phat has a high chanse of dying anyway i think.
but that pc is pretty good, you could sell the graphics card and go for a 5770 and have a realy nice pc.
iv had that cpu and its pretty good. actually i had the 965 but still, its a really good cpu.
Yes. No.Zel3 said:You guys think I should push for 4ghz? Would it help in games?
Utako said:Which next-gen 200+GB SSD should I get out of the three big ones?
This is my final component! Please halp!