cartographer
Member
Also as intended. See, NK isn't as bad in this way, but what about this western country? Or South Korea?Seems weird that the subject has changed to the US.
Also as intended. See, NK isn't as bad in this way, but what about this western country? Or South Korea?Seems weird that the subject has changed to the US.
edit: people berating the OP for this? Get a grip. No one's denying that the North Korean regime is awful and a blight upon human rights, but it is what it is and it's still a fascinating vertical slice of 20th century communism, one of the most bizarre nations in the modern world and whose morbid curiosity wouldn't be engaged by such a thing?
Seems a little weird to put "gymnastics" in English on their shirts. Also why does the first kid have new balance shoes on. Interesting to think what the motivations were in staging this.
No my point was that oppressing your own people or those of other nations doesn't make a difference to me. Both just as shitty and condemnable.Excuse me?
Either you can't type or a sentence or your equating the rapes committed and hand-waved by the NK military/government as "people are people".
Not sure what ",own citizens or not" is supposed to mean.
I really have to wonder what the arrangements are for people who live in these areas? Do these people and their children get fed, clothed and taken care of by the government in exchange for being paraded around in front of tourists? If they act out of line, do they get 'demoted' to working in an underground slave camp or something like it?
dropping bombs full of infected and diseased ants and spiders
No my point was that oppressing your own people or those of other nations doesn't make a difference to me. Both just as shitty and condemnable.
Following that logic it seems hypocritical to me to condemn someone for going to NK but at the same time not do it for other oppressive states.
As for me personally I don't think much of it and won't fabricate outrage over people travelling anywhere unless they approve of the oppression.
That is news to you?Wait, the US is deliberately and intentionally killing/oppressing civilians?
I thought I'd just make a note on the arguments in support of doing this trip and why they're a problem.
The first is that it's "informative" or an interesting experience. This seems benign but taken by itself seems like an accomplishment for the regime. The counterargument that it's not very informative seems a lot more compelling. Everyone seems to agree that it's a controlled experience, and hints of spontaneity aren't a serious refutation of that. What you're allowed to see isn't a representative depiction of the country if that is the goal.
The second is sort of a middle ground where we acknowledge yes NK might be horrible but the tourism might help normalize the relationship or humanize the people of NK or something. But people rightly point out that foreigners don't generally hate the people of NK, and I think you then have the same problem that comes with viewing a controlled experience. I'd be skeptical that your warm foreign charm is particularly useful in a controlled environment. The problem is that these people have no agency in their own society. That a foreigner gets to interact with them in this environment isn't necessarily useful to their lot in life, and seems like a rationalization on the part of the visitor that the interaction was useful.
The third is that visiting doesn't mean anything morally because everyone abuses human rights. While this is sort of true the observation by itself isn't particularly useful. For one it essentially handwaves all moral considerations out the window. If you're going to go further and argue about the quality of the abuse between different countries, there are serious differences, one important one being that if a person tours the US for example you can walk freely and generally not worry the totalitarian regime might object. I can choose to look for or ignore human rights abuses as I see fit.
Oh, we can judge North Korea. They do not occupy some behavioral grey area. They are a cancer who's spread the rest of the world is trying to contain.I never said that both were related, it's just that you can decide to judge a country by one or the other criteria.
lol. this thread is bringing em out I see.And i don't see any difference between a government killing one own citizens or killing citizens from others countries.
very much this. all of this.I thought I'd just make a note on the arguments in support of doing this trip and why they're a problem.
The first is that it's "informative" or an interesting experience. This seems benign but taken by itself seems like an accomplishment for the regime. The counterargument that it's not very informative seems a lot more compelling. Everyone seems to agree that it's a controlled experience, and hints of spontaneity aren't a serious refutation of that. What you're allowed to see isn't a representative depiction of the country if that is the goal.
The second is sort of a middle ground where we acknowledge yes NK might be horrible but the tourism might help normalize the relationship or humanize the people of NK or something. But people rightly point out that foreigners don't generally hate the people of NK, and I think you then have the same problem that comes with viewing a controlled experience. I'd be skeptical that your warm foreign charm is particularly useful in a controlled environment. The problem is that these people have no agency in their own society. That a foreigner gets to interact with them in this environment isn't necessarily useful to their lot in life, and seems like a rationalization on the part of the visitor that the interaction was useful.
The third is that visiting doesn't mean anything morally because everyone abuses human rights. While this is sort of true the observation by itself isn't particularly useful. For one it essentially handwaves all moral considerations out the window. If you're going to go further and argue about the quality of the abuse between different countries, there are serious differences, one important one being that if a person tours the US for example you can walk freely and generally not worry the totalitarian regime might object. I can choose to look for or ignore human rights abuses as I see fit.
I don't mind people disagreeing but the smart arse attitude and rudeness isn't necessary. Saying I'm bizarre, disgusting, comparing me to nazi's, ect. Can you not accept a different opinion or view point? No you're right. Even though I was the one who went there and saw it and discussed it with people from all over the world and all aspects of life to get an understand I'm obviously a moron, you're 100% right. Good talk.
That is news to you?
😂😂😂😂😂
I'm out and suggest you take some time to read up on US history.
Did you expect anything else from Condom? Literally par for the course around here.Your intelligence shines in your posts Condom.
Especially comparing the USA's political history/climate with the current climate in NK.
Truly a visionary among us.
A nice write up and I hope the OP and his supporters don't ignore it
well stated.The thing that gets me here is that - far from worrying about funding NK or anything of that sort - you're saying that traveling and specifically traveling to North Korea was to expand your thoughts on the country? To learn a little something and experience something new? I imagine that's why a lot of us travel the world. Why we find the off beaten path and go somewhere exotic and drink in a culture and people that are entirely unique and special when held against our day to day expectations which is awesome and totally a legit reason to travel.
But this trip of yours was none of that and I think that's maybe where some of the more aggressive responses to your OP are coming from. You can't go on a guided, manufactured, elaborate hoax of a tour and then say you really learned anything. you could apply this to literally anywhere in the world. Why go to Tokyo and then sign up for a walking tour of a few anime shops? Why go to Australia and visit the hotel and the beach and then say you gained some understanding of what it's like for aboriginal peoples in the bush? Why visit the states and see just NY and then claim to know the troubles of people in Detroit or Southern Cali or wherever?
You're coming across as saying you learned a thing and gained a perspective. We are trying to impart unto you that this perspective is a carefully manufactured thing and if you're interested in being a worldly person and a traveler than the last thing you should want is to be hand held through a sideshow. Which is what you saw. A sideshow.
It's a comfortable distraction from the utter shite their govt. is pulling all around that country - and to some extent... you're shrugging at that fact. Some of us have a hard time swallowing that.
Maybe, but honestly, can you blame them, when you consider the OP's hopeless gullibility?Which is why I said some---I see there are plenty of you not being complete dicks. I can't say anything positive for those who immediately jumped down his throat and were shitty right off the bat. The discussion was smashed to shit before it even got started.
I really have to wonder what the arrangements are for people who live in these areas? Do these people and their children get fed, clothed and taken care of by the government in exchange for being paraded around in front of tourists? If they act out of line, do they get 'demoted' to working in an underground slave camp or something like it?
Overly simplified, but yes, more or less. The people the tour groups are seeing are families considered as "good" and generally have family working in the government somewhere. They'll live in an apartment and get rations of food (that fluctuates, depending on A. The 'military first' propaganda of the time and B. The availability) and occasionally gifted a TV set or something. They'll be paid a sum in USD so they can shop on the black markets where they can buy other food and clothing, the New Balance shoes remarked about are one of the items that would have been bought in USD on these black markets (which are really grey, used to be highly illegal but after becoming a necessity, have become accepted and even beneficial to the regime). They'll also be able to buy south Korean DVDs and other such things which most people think doesn't happen because it doesn't fit the 'hermit Kingdom' narrative. If they fall out of favour however, even just one member of the family, then the whole lot of them will be carted away to forced labour camps. Falling out of favour might be something extreme like defecting to the south or something much much less trivial, like having a second cousin who failed to bribe a checkpoint guard sometime at some point in the past. That's a vague example but hey, that's all part of why the majority tow the line, isn't it?
As I said, it's an oversimplification, but yeah that's basically it exactly.
I discovered those who say they "illegally" took photos on their trip or had to "sneak out" pictures are full of shit.
They removed gullible from the dictionary!?This is the angriest I've been since they removed "gullible" from the dictionary.
I really have to wonder what the arrangements are for people who live in these areas? Do these people and their children get fed, clothed and taken care of by the government in exchange for being paraded around in front of tourists? If they act out of line, do they get 'demoted' to working in an underground slave camp or something like it?
I still don't know what exactly were game reviewers talking about when discussing negative aspects of vertical slice previews, but you just nudged me into direction of assuming they were correct.
They removed gullible from the dictionary!?
Because it's funding NK leadership and contributing to the propaganda they push, all while people are suffering. The whole point is to bring in revenue and send people away thinking "it ain't so bad".
Whenever I see pictures of NK, I see a cardboard cutout of a country. Empty and seldom used.
Jeebus.
Touche.
I just watched this one. Seems a little more eye opening seeing it from the perspective of a defector rather than a tourist.
https://youtu.be/_ZEmDpkz0g4
The video message for her sister killed me.Dear lord that bit about her father's body. Holy shit.
It looks like that sliver is misleading at the very best, and if the analogy comes from layered cake or lasagne or something like this, I am going to say slice looks horizontal from my point of view.I really can't say I view the world from the perspective of video games, so I can't relate to your zany quip. I meant it in the most traditional sense of the term; it's a small 21st century sliver from a bygone whole, throwing light on the tragedies and insanities of 20th century authoritarian 'communism'.
It looks like that sliver is misleading at the very best, and if the analogy comes from layered cake or lasagne or something like this, I am going to say slice looks horizontal from my point of view.
Don't snitch on Miss Puk. You never know if they actually read Gaf :OThe third was the woman in the photo further above. Happy, beautiful, and smart. She was everyone's favourite guide and what we found out was she wasn't an anomaly. Women in NK generally know and understand things more than men who are more of the followers and sheep. While women don't outwardly say this, the guide told us about it. Miss Puk even knew about other countries and expressed wanting to visit Australia one day. .
Did OP ever put up pictures of the Sith Lord/Great Leader tombs or did ya'll scare him away already?
Or to flee political persecution, but mostly to get rich yes. Most of the people would agree that the domestic system of the US is great.
I never said that both were related, it's just that you can decide to judge a country by one or the other criteria.
And i don't see any difference between a government killing one own citizens or killing citizens from others countries.
The thing that gets me here is that - far from worrying about funding NK or anything of that sort - you're saying that traveling and specifically traveling to North Korea was to expand your thoughts on the country? To learn a little something and experience something new? I imagine that's why a lot of us travel the world. Why we find the off beaten path and go somewhere exotic and drink in a culture and people that are entirely unique and special when held against our day to day expectations which is awesome and totally a legit reason to travel.
But this trip of yours was none of that and I think that's maybe where some of the more aggressive responses to your OP are coming from. You can't go on a guided, manufactured, elaborate hoax of a tour and then say you really learned anything. you could apply this to literally anywhere in the world. Why go to Tokyo and then sign up for a walking tour of a few anime shops? Why go to Australia and visit the hotel and the beach and then say you gained some understanding of what it's like for aboriginal peoples in the bush? Why visit the states and see just NY and then claim to know the troubles of people in Detroit or Southern Cali or wherever?
You're coming across as saying you learned a thing and gained a perspective. We are trying to impart unto you that this perspective is a carefully manufactured thing and if you're interested in being a worldly person and a traveler than the last thing you should want is to be hand held through a sideshow. Which is what you saw. A sideshow.
It's a comfortable distraction from the utter shite their govt. is pulling all around that country - and to some extent... you're shrugging at that fact. Some of us have a hard time swallowing that.
And no, those kids weren't. We simply drove past them and I had my camera at the ready. They weren't orchestrated and timed.
And I swear I've read that exact description of how NK kids react to foreigners elsewhere - "like we were celebrities". Is that a normal reaction for children to strangers?
You say you could tell the difference when something was fake or not. I disagree.