Looks rancid. I'm done with the LOTR stuff, probably why. I remember used to being an LOTR fanboy on the BOM forums :/
welp, enjoy missing out
Looks rancid. I'm done with the LOTR stuff, probably why. I remember used to being an LOTR fanboy on the BOM forums :/
So, as someone who didn't read the books all this looks like a slightly different rehash of the first LOTR trilogy. Definitely on the lower tier of anticipation for me.
Looks rancid. I'm done with the LOTR stuff, probably why. I remember used to being an LOTR fanboy on the BOM forums :/
So you just posted those 115 images from the trailer because your job paid you to, then, or what?
( just kidding around, I like you)
http://thefilmstage.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/The_Hobbit_0120111220_0052.jpg
I like this guy. The calm intensity he gives off while pulling his pipe from his mouth is great.
Much like Gandalf.
I could sit and watch Gandalf glowering in the corner smoking a pipe (like two shots from this trailer) for 3.5 hours alone.
So you just posted those 115 images from the trailer because your job paid you to, then, or what?
( just kidding around, I like you)
Understood. Later. Call again sometime when you're in the neighborhood.
It looks gorgeous, I'm just talking about the story elements. I'm sure I'll have a warm, nostalgic feeling watching the film but I can't see myself being that affected by it.
What? He doesn't even look like a dwarf, he's just some dude sitting there.
There's more to a good movie than a plot that constantly slams your nose into fresh piles of excitement. You'll find much to enjoy in a story's calmer intervals if you can push away that urge to find out what happens next and simply appreciate the moment.How pretty something is means nothing if the movie is a bore.
Believe it or not, not everyone was entertained by seeing people walk across valleys and mountains for what felt like hours before something new in the plot happened.
That trailer was obviously cut for people who had read the books. Maybe they'll do a different trailer for people who haven't, because I can't see that having the right resonance if you aren't familiar with the song the dwarves sing.So, as someone who didn't read the books all this looks like a slightly different rehash of the first LOTR trilogy. Definitely on the lower tier of anticipation for me.
That trailer was obviously cut for people who had read the books. Maybe they'll do a different trailer for people who haven't, because I can't see that having the right resonance if you aren't familiar with the song the dwarves sing.
To be honest, it's very different from LOTR.
The plan from the outset is actually one part caper and one part revenge story. Hell, Bilbo's role in the story is a "burglar" in this caper, though there's no demo guy and no safe cracker.
It's a "job that must be done" much like the ring being thrown in the fires, but this job is self-serving and more about gold and jewels and the return of the dwarves homes.
In a way it's like a Western. Think War Wagon, Great Train Robbery, or Good, The Bad, The Ugly. They gather the men and go off to rob a big fucking dragon.
Then once they get to the mountain, things happen and there's a few "twists" (not M Night style twists, but unexpected things such as a war).
The dwarves look like cartoons. They didn't in the other movies.
Dwarves were like any other of the Children of Illuvatar (even though they were more like step-children, considering it was Aule who first created them, but life was given to them by Illuvatar), they're full of variety. There were some from the race of men who looked elvish, there were darker elves who almost looked like members of the race of men. Same goes for Hobbits, some were actually a lot taller and more in scale with men. Some of the dwarves have more dwarven features, others less so and this is probably the angle that Peter and co are using.What? He doesn't even look like a dwarf, he's just some dude sitting there. The old one was the best of the lot.
Cool! That stuff sounds neat, hope the film delivers on that.
I need the music yesterday.
I'll watch it but it doesn't seem to have smaug in it. I guess that will be for the 2nd movie.
Saw some trolls and the spiders so at least that will be fun.
The Swedish actor Mikael Persbrandt is cast as Beorn in Peter Jackson's The Hobbit. Beorn never actually shape-shifts between man and bear-form during the narrative of The Hobbit book: he is encountered in both forms, but his actual transformation appears "off-screen", away from the point of view of the main characters. Comments made by Weta Workshop indicate that in the adaptation, Beorn's transformation from man to bear will be a major special effects sequence.
He's been cast and a few spy shots of what might be his hall have emerged.I really hope they cut nothing. I can think of two things that might be cut and I really really hope they're not:
1) the warg attack (similar to the warg attack from Fellowship that was never scripted into the movie) which was cut from the Hobbit animated special
2) Beorn - though I swore I saw that he was cast...?
I believe someone in production said the first movie will end with the barrels going down the river? Maybe?
Cannot wait to watch this. I loved the Hobbit.
Edit: Ben, from wikipedia:
I don't want to see a fucking thing of Smaug until opening night. I want to be in a theater full of people not expecting it. Just like the theater being blown away by the Balrog in FOTR.
will he even be in part 1?
Got it, I'll be pissing in your beer.Understood. Later. Call again sometime when you're in the neighborhood.
The trailer did nothing for me emotionally. Technically, I like the digital, clean look of it. The 48fps aspect of things intrigues me the most.
Woo, I'm not alone.How pretty something is means nothing if the movie is a bore.
Believe it or not, not everyone was entertained by seeing people walk across valleys and mountains for what felt like hours before something new in the plot happened.
will he even be in part 1?
Got it, I'll be pissing in your beer.
We might not see him in full until the second film, if at all. They may just use The Necromancer as the protagonist in An Unexpected Journey, but have Smaug as a brooding, overarching presence, with hints towards him every now and then.I don't want to see a fucking thing of Smaug until opening night. I want to be in a theater full of people not expecting it. Just like the theater being blown away by the Balrog in FOTR.
Edmond Dantès;33636374 said:We might not see him in full until the second film, if at all. They may just use The Necromancer as the protagonist in An Unexpected Journey, but have Smaug as a brooding, overarching presence, with hints towards him every now and then.
I think Bilbo going down the river on a barrel with the Lonely Mountain looming in front of him would be good way to end the first film.Or end the first one with the reveal of Smaug. End on a cliffhanger. But that doesn't seem to be Jackson's style.