http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-40478813
I was thinking of this while reading the other thread about the world going to shit. Even if it isn't the West, it is other powers vying for geopolitical control. I do like how China has border disputes with almost every neighboring country and keeps taking land under the guise of sovereignty since historical times. Before they lost at the UN and Hague, they would cite the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea until they were found to violate it, now they say it is an internal Chinese sovereignty law matter that is only discussed between the two parties. They now are using some random agreement with the British to take key areas of Bhutan that hampers India's military projection against Chinese aggression, and not listening to Bhutan who said it violates their agreement. Meaning they won't engage the country who's land they are now building on. Going to be interesting seeing the latter half of this century as these two emerging superpowers jostle for hegemonic control with a declining West.
For four weeks, India and China have been involved in a stand-off along part of their 3,500km (2,174-mile) shared border.
The two nations fought a war over the border in 1962 and disputes remain unresolved in several areas, causing tensions to rise from time to time. Since this confrontation began last month, each side has reinforced its troops and called on the other to back down.
The row erupted when India opposed China's attempt to extend a border road through a plateau known as Doklam in India and Donglang in China.
The plateau, which lies at a junction between China, the north-eastern Indian state of Sikkim and Bhutan, is currently disputed between Beijing and Thimphu. India supports Bhutan's claim over it.
India is concerned that if the road is completed, it will give China greater access to India's strategically vulnerable "chicken's neck", a 20km (12-mile) wide corridor that links the seven north-eastern states to the Indian mainland.
China has reiterated its sovereignty over the area, saying that the road is in its territory and accusing Indian troops of "trespassing". It said India would do well to remember its defeat in the 1962 war, warning Delhi that China was also more powerful than it was then.
On Monday, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesman said that the border in Sikkim had been settled in an 1890 agreement with the British, and that India's violation of this was "very serious". The Global Times newspaper, meanwhile, accused India of undermining Bhutan's sovereignty by interfering in the road project, although Bhutan has since asked China to stop construction.
Bhutan's Ambassador to Delhi Vetsop Namgyel says China's road construction is "in violation of an agreement between the two countries".
I was thinking of this while reading the other thread about the world going to shit. Even if it isn't the West, it is other powers vying for geopolitical control. I do like how China has border disputes with almost every neighboring country and keeps taking land under the guise of sovereignty since historical times. Before they lost at the UN and Hague, they would cite the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea until they were found to violate it, now they say it is an internal Chinese sovereignty law matter that is only discussed between the two parties. They now are using some random agreement with the British to take key areas of Bhutan that hampers India's military projection against Chinese aggression, and not listening to Bhutan who said it violates their agreement. Meaning they won't engage the country who's land they are now building on. Going to be interesting seeing the latter half of this century as these two emerging superpowers jostle for hegemonic control with a declining West.