In what way isn't it fully compliant? As for bugs to workaround, if you follow any person working with GPU nitty gritty, they will often tell you how crazy buggy GPUs are:
https://twitter.com/FioraAeterna/status/772454513437396993
As for jd.com backers only paying $270, I understand that it's considerably cheaper to ship things within China, so paying 10% less than me is fine.
Honestly the only thing I was miffed about was the order of operations. But I've since admitted defeat and moved on.
The Z8000 series is unable to comply with a max 20ms power ramp duration tINIT0 so its not fully compliant with JESD209-3 aka LPDDR3 standards but at the same time it affects nothing and Intel has waivers.
I am well aware of all of that, it was more sarcasm at how everyone has gotten worked up into a frenzy and some people on IGG are suddenly demanding refunds when we don't even know if changes have been made because of a Chinese festival, they have never promised we'd get the Z8750 and everyones throwing around how the Z8700 has alpha blending issues when there's no hard proof that will affect anything and the issue and you can avoid the conditions that trigger the issue in the first place.
All the errata Intel has published details about sound scary but they can all be worked around and some people are acting as if that's unacceptable.
Honestly the thing that confuses me the most about the Z8750 is how they mention it fixed issues with alpha blending and atsc graphics but of the 48 (49 total) errata shared by the entire Z8000 line there is no mention of ATSC anywhere at all and in Intel's list of errata the only one in the entire list that is not shared between the Z8*00 and Z8*50 lines is CHT30 where "SoC May Experience an Incorrect Pixel Alpha Component in The Render Target ."
I'm kinda wondering if this alpha blending bug only applies to atsc broadcasts which means everyone is literally getting worked up about nothing.
Gonna try to see if I can get any more info out of Intel.