Israel attacks another UN school (19 dead, 126 injured)

Status
Not open for further replies.
do you think they give out leaflets for those "safe" locations

A) If so where do they go now?

B) If not is the bombing justified?

Holy shit dude, no. They outline the non-safe locations, where targets will be destroyed because they have proof of Hamas weapon caches.

If you were a Palestinian you would be dead because you didn't read.

edit: Misread what you said, sorry.

The roads are still open within the 25 km strip, they can go further away from the 2km zone.
 
So if you were Hamas, you would tell people to stay in their homes because Israel is lying to you?

If I was a Palestinian I would fear for myself and my family

Holy shit dude, no. They outline the non-safe locations, where targets will be destroyed because they have proof of Hamas weapon caches.

If you were a Palestinian you would be dead because you didn't read.

and I am saying that those safe areas STILL get bombed
 
So if you were Hamas, you would tell people to stay in their homes because Israel is lying to you?

So once they move them elsewhere they're safe? Like I dunno a UN school which the UN told israel multiple times about and how many refugees were there? It doesn't matter where Israel cart these people around, they're going to bomb them anyway.
 
That warning was good for a day. As posted english earlier...

I think you've already realized by now that this glorified shell game of theirs is intended to confuse as many people as possible as they're herded back and forth such that they catch confused people in zones that were safe one day and targets the next.

"They were warned" is not a valid excuse when you warn them daily that the previous day's "safe zone" is the next day's target. This is completely intentional.
 
Include the fact that you'd have to have food and provision for your family


and today in your "SAFE" park you don't see some flyers falling from the sky

I guess I got to guess if this place is safe or maybe I should run to another place and gamble my life
 
Holy shit dude, no. They outline the non-safe locations, where targets will be destroyed because they have proof of Hamas weapon caches.
The supposedly safe locations are also being hit. Again, where are they supposed to go? Every "safe" place (hospitals, UN shelters, churches, Central Gaza) has been attacked and people living there know they can be attacked.

At this point I'm not surprised some people don't leave their homes. It's not martyrdom, it's hopelessness.
If you were a Palestinian you would be dead because you didn't read.
This isn't something to joke about.
 
Can we all agree when Israel finds a Hamas target they want to destroy, they should warn civilians before taking action?

We all agree that, they don't do that enough, especially the flyer strategy?
 
So we all agree when Israel finds a Hamas target they want to destroy, they should warn civilians before taking action?

We all agree that, they don't do that enough, especially the flyer strategy.

The flyer strategy isn't meant to work, it's a weak attempt to shift blame when civilians get killed.
 
The flyer strategy isn't meant to work, it's a weak attempt to shift blame when civilians get killed.

It's the second time they do it, give it a chance.

edit: no there were also flyers on the 16th, I am looking to see if there is a ressource to see them all.
 
Can we all agree when Israel finds a Hamas target they want to destroy, they should warn civilians before taking action?

We all agree that, they don't do that enough, especially the flyer strategy?

Why do you care so much about Israel's leafleting and not as much as their absolute abhorrent behaviour. Like the poster above said, it's a poor attempt at shifting blame.

'Well we warned them we were gonna bomb their homes, so that makes it alright'
What about when you don't warn them? Or what about when you're fully aware of a UN school full of refugees?
'Erm, human shields blah blah blah'

It's the second time they do it, give it a chance.

Yeah, give em a chance! After all what's another school full of kids.
 
It's the second time they do it, give it a chance.

edit: no there were also flyers on the 16th, I am looking to see if there is a ressource to see them all.

"Gimme another chance dude" doesn't really fly when you're talking about bombing school and killing 19 inside. wtf.
 
full boycott time

shit has gone waaaaaaaaay to far, and this Israeli government can go fuck itself. Barbarians.
 
Why do you care so much about Israel's leafleting and not as much as their absolute abhorrent behaviour. Like the poster above said, it's a poor attempt at shifting blame.

'Well we warned them we were gonna bomb their homes, so that makes it alright'
What about when you don't warn them? Or what about when you're fully aware of a UN school full of refugees?
'Erm, human shields blah blah blah'



Yeah, give em a chance! After all what's another school full of kids.

Why imply I would defend an attack without warning, because I think a warning system can be legit way to save lives?

"Gimme another chance dude" doesn't really fly when you're talking about bombing school and killing 19 inside. wtf.

I am participating in the dicussion, that veered away from the OP when posters ridiculed the leaflets strategy.
 
Palestinians are so glad that Israel gave them a flyer on Monday so that they can live for awhile and die instead on Wednesday

so considerate... life is overrated anyway

Edit: Flyers would only work if they had a place to go but living in a place (Gaza) that is less then half the size of LA gives them limited options... for awhile before they have no options (but who cares about that)
 
Why imply I would defend an attack without warning, because I think a warning system can be legit way to save lives?

Because you should realize by now that Israel has and never will be interested in having a proper warning system. Those leaflets aren't ever intended to be an actual warning system to save lives. Those leaflets are there to confuse and scramble civilians out of every hole so they can corral them into "safe" zones and jerk them around so hard that they're easy targets to kill them shortly thereafter.

I am participating in the dicussion, that veered away from the OP when posters ridiculed the leaflets strategy.

Right. I'm just saying Israel is beyond the point of giving them the benefit of the doubt given the atrocities they've been committing the past few weeks.
 
Well, previous leaflets were specific to which areas they were targeting...

140713-world-idfleaflets-430a_e4da79c8d54a856c4e052d3f17084461.jpg

Wait a moment... why are these flyers in English??
 
Well, previous leaflets were specific to which areas they were targeting...

Can we all agree when Israel finds a Hamas target they want to destroy, they should warn civilians before taking action?

We all agree that, they don't do that enough, especially the flyer strategy?

the IRA used to phone the police and warn them before they bombed clubs and pubs and murdered innocent people on the streets. Was that okay?

warning people is their way of shifting blame when it goes wrong. Those leaflets are meant for us. They're nothing more than a PR strategy.
 
Why imply I would defend an attack without warning, because I think a warning system can be legit way to save lives?



I am participating in the dicussion, that veered away from the OP when posters ridiculed the leaflets strategy.

It's not working! It's like whispering 'hey watch out' in the middle of an all out war. No one is going to hear it. Nor does it matter when they get the message! They're fucked wherever they go, no matter what they do.
 
Gemüsepizza;123367037 said:
Wait a moment... why are these flyers in English??

PR, to show the deluded in the US they are not targeting civilians (that are not in power-plants or UN schools).
 
the IRA used to phone the police and warn them before they bombed clubs and pubs and murdered innocent people on the streets. Was that okay?

I don't agree with the methods of getting rid of enemy weapon caches, so what do you think?

Dismissing them as simply a PR strategy is being willfully blind, becuase it interferes with your narrative of a cold heartless Israel. As I said, even if 1 person is saved, warning the people is worth it.

They can have good intentions, even if they are heavy handed and incompetent.
 
I don't agree with the methods of getting rid of enemy weapon caches, so what do you think?

Dismissing them as simply a PR strategy is being willfully blind, becuase it interferes with your narrative of a cold heartless Israel. As I said, even if 1 person is saved, warning the people is worth it.

They can have good intentions, even if they are heavy handed and incompetent.

You don't get to erase a thousand deaths by dropping some leaflets. They are not saving any lives, they are doing nothing but taking lives.
 
You don't get to erase a thousand deaths by dropping some leaflets. They are not saving any lives, they are doing nothing but taking lives.

Can you quote where I implied something like that? Or remotely close to that?

The leaflets are useful to warn against a specific offensive. They are rarely used.
 
The problem is people want to view this as a black and white issue. Israel are heartless monsters and Palestinians are victims and vice versa. The issues are way more complicated than just that kind of simple view.

Until we can look at things for what they truly are without bias or favoritism we will never be able to solve the problem.
 
Gemüsepizza;123367037 said:
Wait a moment... why are these flyers in English??

The people the IDF wrote those for don't live in Gaza.

PR, to show the deluded in the US they are not targeting civilians (that are not in power-plants or UN schools).

haha guys... these are computer-generated reproductions, translated in English. These aren't photographs of the actual flyers. (I got trolled again, didn't I?lol oh u guys)
 
The problem is people want to view this as a black and white issue. Israel are heartless monsters and Palestinians are victims and vice versa. The issues are way more complicated than just that kind of simple view.

Until we can look at things for what they truly are without bias or favoritism we will never be able to solve the problem.

This whole "but things are more complicated"-view is imo also one of the reasons why there has been no progress for such a long time. Because I don't think it is that complicated. Some people just have too look at this conflict from a different perspective.
 
Oh God, this is going to lead nowhere good.

just so you know how combat in an urban environment works, the defenders always have the upper hand when it comes to the element of surprise, whether it be ambushes or booby traps, they way to combat that with an invading force is fire power,you arent sure if an alleyway is booby trapped? throw a grenade in there, militants are shooting at you from a building? call for artillery, or better yet an airstrike,safest option is to topple the whole building down.

in urban warfare more firepower= safer troops.

its the reason there are so many casualties, any invading force has to decided between collateral damage and loss of soldiers lives, was the same in Iraq and Afghanistan, its why there were tens of thousands civilians dead there as well.
 
haha guys... these are computer-generated reproductions, translated in English. These aren't photographs of the actual flyers. (I got trolled again, didn't I?lol oh u guys)
I wasn't speaking literally.
just so you know how combat in an urban environment works, the defenders always have the upper hand when it comes to the element of surprise, whether it be ambushes or booby traps, they way to combat that with an invading force is fire power,you arent sure if an alleyway is booby trapped? throw a grenade in there, militants are shooting at you from a building? call for artillery, or better yet an airstrike,safest option is to topple the whole building down.

in urban warfare more firepower= safer troops.

its the reason there are so many casualties, any invading force has to decided between collateral damage and loss of soldiers lives, was the same in Iraq and Afghanistan, its why there were tens of thousands civilians dead there as well.
Why are attacks happening on places where there is no evidence of militants?

"Better safe than sorry" doesn't apply to shelling a refugee shelter after not obliging their evacuation requests.
 
Gemüsepizza;123370064 said:
This whole "but things are more complicated"-view is imo also one of the reasons why there has been no progress for such a long time. Because I don't think it is that complicated. Some people just have too look at this conflict from a different perspective.

What is your solution? Keep in mind it's not just enough to think of a good solution you would have to get lots of different people to sign onto it. That's where the difficulty comes in.
 
Can you quote where I implied something like that? Or remotely close to that?

The leaflets are useful to warn against a specific offensive. They are rarely used.

If you have a hundred lives and you deploy leaflets that save 12 lives that is still a deficit of 88 lives. None of which actually had to be destroyed to begin with.

Arithmetic.
 
You're right Israel should blow the building up without any warning. You happy now?
Are you for real?

Talk about a logical fallacy.

Way to take someones argument and twist it to a simplistic point that no one was making. Nice argument.

Pretty ridiculous how all of the pro-Israeli guys are trying to avoid this whole event by giving silly politician answers or by answering a different problem.
 
Gemüsepizza;123370064 said:
This whole "but things are more complicated"-view is imo also one of the reasons why there has been no progress for such a long time. Because I don't think it is that complicated. Some people just have too look at this conflict from a different perspective.

What is your solution?
 
It's the second time they do it, give it a chance.

edit: no there were also flyers on the 16th, I am looking to see if there is a ressource to see them all.

give it a chance?

what?

civilians are dying, that is not a 'chance'

sorry guys let's try again we'll get better at this I promise, hang on while we murder the shit out of your family with our bombs
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom