Your reaction:
Sami Zayn wins the rumble.
"YES OH NO WAIT THEY'RE GOING TO RUIN HIM NOOOO"
that's how cynical I am about WWE right now
Your reaction:
Sami Zayn wins the rumble.
LEGITSHOOK.COM PRESENTS
WWF In Your House 10: Mind Games 9/22/96
- Justin Hawk Bradshaw vs Savio Vega Caribbean Strap Match
- Jim Cornette vs Jose Lothario
- Owen Hart/British Bulldog vs Smoking Gunns WWF Tag Team Championships
- Jerry Lawler vs Mark Henry
- Goldust vs Undertaker Final Curtain Match
- Mankind vs Shawn Michaels WWF Championship
Either Russo started this month or Heyman helped with the show. The main event is among the best WWF championship matches of the 90s. It's a full on ECW crazy brawl/fight, but done with two competent wrestlers instead of Tommy Dreamer and actually having a story instead of just mindless brawling in the crowd. Probably the most frustrating thing about HBK in the New Gen era is that he'd have a match like this, or the no holds barred one with Diesel, but then he'd have terrible matches most of the time because he couldn't get over doing smarmy comedy shit.
I'd still watch an Undertaker Goldust match today.
Why? They had 3 PPV matches in 1996 and all 3 were boring as shit. Just bad, completely uninteresting matches.
Why? They had 3 PPV matches in 1996 and all 3 were boring as shit. Just bad, completely uninteresting matches.
I'd still watch an Undertaker Goldust match today.
Strobo, what did you ultimately discover about the Muslim faith? Is it TRULY a peaceful religion?
My boss is currently taking classes about Islam from a former Muslim who turned Christian.
So you know..don't know how biased that is.
But so far he tells me they believe you are better of dead than being a nonbeliever/follower.
They are doing you a favor from becoming even more corrupted.
In the end beats me man. Fucking Dinosaurs in the ground man.
Every religion is fucked up and violent in that way, if you pick and choose your quotes. People who choose to buy in to the violent parts of religion over the peaceful/loving parts shows you more about the kind of person they are than which man in the sky they believe in.https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy 13:6-10
6 If your very own brother, or your son or daughter, or the wife you love, or your closest friend secretly entices you, saying, Let us go and worship other gods (gods that neither you nor your ancestors have known, 7 gods of the peoples around you, whether near or far, from one end of the land to the other), 8 do not yield to them or listen to them. Show them no pity. Do not spare them or shield them. 9 You must certainly put them to death. Your hand must be the first in putting them to death, and then the hands of all the people. 10 Stone them to death, because they tried to turn you away from the Lord your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery.
So, I've noticed a lot of people had been shitting on women's wrestling lately, and I think it is entirely unfair, so I put up a post about it here
TL;DR - Basically not watching women's wrestling just because they are women and you think they shouldn't compete in athletic events makes you a bit of a dick.
Strobo, what did you ultimately discover about the Muslim faith? Is it TRULY a peaceful religion?
So, I've noticed a lot of people had been shitting on women's wrestling lately, and I think it is entirely unfair, so I put up a post about it here
TL;DR - Basically not watching women's wrestling just because they are women and you think they shouldn't compete in athletic events makes you a bit of a dick.
Every religion is fucked up and violent in that way, if you pick and choose your quotes. People who choose to buy in to the violent parts of religion over the peaceful/loving parts shows you more about the kind of person they are than which man in the sky they believe in.
Just sayin'.
I don't know of anyone here who doesn't watch women's wrestling because they're women.....
I think most religions have done a better job ignoring the fucked up things though. That's just how I feel.
It's very conflicted. It tells you to be peaceful, take care of orphans and the homeless, be charitable, don't force anyone to be a Muslim that doesn't want to be one while at the same time glorifying whole cities being forced to convert or get their heads cut off. There are peaceful aspects, so it could be a peaceful religion if you choose not to follow the war time rules, which seemed to be most of the time.
Big on charity and taking care of the community/homeless/orphans and comparatively, women had far more rights than they did under Judaism (and really, women in the Koran seem to have better rights then than they do in Saudi Arabia in 2015). So if you want it to be a peaceful religion, I think it can be. If you're following it to the letter, it is inherently violent and the spread of it through violence is praised in the Koran many times (even though there are plenty of times it says that's a bad thing to do....the book is conflicted on its messaging).
It's basically Judaism with different names for things and Judaism has hundreds of years of glorifying killing everything and everyone in their path on the way to the Promised Land.
smart choiceWWE has chosen who is going to win the Royal Rumble and while it can change the plan as of now, apparently, is to go with Daniel Bryan.
smart choice
When I tell my boss about all the fucked up things Christians did, he pretty much says..those were not real Christians. Forget the old testament, Jesus basically gave everyone a new starting point for peace and hippy love.
I can't recall much about the books after the Gospel. But I assume it focuses a lot on killing all these new hipsters.
"Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.
smart choice
Of course these 5000-1500 year old religions are outdated in 2015. They're all stupid and should have no bearing on the modern world. You might as well be following some old viking or Greek gods shit.
To know that would require him to have actually participated in discussion here beyond plugging his blog.
I don't know of anyone here who doesn't watch women's wrestling because they're women.....if anything, they don't watch it because it usually sucks in WWE. That's a FACT. The main roster gives maybe 15 minutes to a whole divas championship match segment on PPV and that includes maybe 5 minutes of wrestling and most of them ARE clumsy in the ring. I haven't seen anyone blatantly shitting on it because they're women though.
so does that mean we are getting cena vs bryan #2 or bryan vs lesnar?
Has anybody here sunk a bunch of time in to Immortals? I like the designs and the ways they've re-imagined wrestlers, but it seems like it would be no fun to play for any length of time.
Couldn't they hand the title off to somebody in the Feb PPV?
Maybe Roman wins it there?
smart choice
Rusev's streak going to Reigns would be fine.
It's definitely there, I've seen it (not here though). The WWE's portrayal of women is absolutely ridiculous, I don't understand how NXT can do more with their's in 4 hours a month to WWE's 7 hours a week. Plus you have a ton of good femal independent talent as well.
Gonna need a source on your hotscoopz dirtsheetz over here.smart choice
Reigns doesn't deserve it since Rusev is such a better worker, but I could live with Reigns ending Rusev's run. It's better than Cena ending it, that's for sure.
smart choice
Who else would they give it to?