• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

July Wrasslin’ |OT| The Ring’s a Field, the Field of War, That’s Where We Lay the Law

Zach

Member
1983
Starrcade '83: A Flair for the Gold - B

1984
Starrcade '84: The Million Dollar Challenge - C

1985
WrestleMania - B-
The Wrestling Classic - D+
Starrcade '85: The Gathering - C

1986
WrestleMania 2 - C+
The Big Event - C-
Starrcade '86: The Sky Walkers - C+

1987
WrestleMania III - B-
Starrcade '87: Chi-Town Heat - C+
Survivor Series '87 - C-

1988
Bunkhouse Stampede '88 - C-
Royal Rumble '88 - C-
Clash of the Champions I - B+
WrestleMania IV - C
Clash of the Champions II - C+
The Great American Bash '88 - B
SummerSlam '88 - D
Clash of the Champions III - C-
Survivor Series '88 - D
Clash of the Champions IV - C+
Starrcade '88: True Gritt - B

1989
Royal Rumble '89 - F
Clash of the Champions V - C-
Clash of the Champions VI - B
WrestleMania V - B-
WrestleWar '89 - C
Clash of the Champions VII - C+
The Great American Bash '89 - B+
SummerSlam '89 - C
Clash of the Champions VIII - B-
Halloween Havoc '89 - C+
Clash of the Champions IX - B
Survivor Series '89 - D+
Starrcade '89: Future Shock - C+

1990
Royal Rumble '90 - D+
Clash of the Champions X - B-
WrestleWar '90 - C
WrestleMania VI - B
Capital Combat: The Return of Robocop - B-
Clash of the Champions XI - C
The Great American Bash '90 - B-
SummerSlam '90 - D
Clash of the Champions XII - D
Halloween Havoc '90 - C-
Clash of the Champions XIII - D
Survivor Series '90 - D+
Starrcade '90: Collision Course - B-

1991
Royal Rumble '91 - D+
Clash of the Champions XIV - B-
WrestleWar '91 - C+
WrestleMania VII - D+
SuperBrawl - C-
Clash of the Champions XV - B-
The Great American Bash '91 - F
SummerSlam '91 - C-
Clash of the Champions XVI - C
Halloween Havoc '91 - B-
Clash of the Champions XVII - B-
Survivor Series '91 - D
This Tuesday in Texas - C
Starrcade '91: Battlebowl - C-

1992
Royal Rumble '92 - B-
Clash of the Champions XVIII - B
SuperBrawl II - B+
WrestleMania VIII - B-
WrestleWar '92 - B-
Beach Blast '92 - B+
Clash of the Champions XIX - B
The Great American Bash '92 - C+
SummerSlam '92 - C-
Clash of the Champions XX - B+
Halloween Havoc '92 - C-
Clash of the Champions XXI - C+
Survivor Series '92 - C-
Starrcade '92 - B-

1993
Clash of the Champions XXII - B
Royal Rumble '92 - C
SuperBrawl III - B-
WrestleMania IX - C-
Slamboree '93 - D+
King of the Ring '93 - C+
Clash of the Champions XXIII - C+
Beach Blast '93 - B-
Clash of the Champions XXIV - C+

Not a ton of great wrasslin' at the latest Clash, but there were a few exciting returns and dat Shockmaster debut. With context, the infamous debut was more awkward and sad than funny. I wondered if the commentators would just act like it didn't happen for the remainder of the event, but Jesse just couldn't help himself, alluding to it multiple times. Best commentator ever.
 

DiscoJon

Banned
Ain't like that
Okay good. I was worried that you had sexual intercourse with a "drunk woman" that was "looking for some action" even though her judgment was potentially impaired due to the effects of alcohol. I mean, taking advantage of a "drunk woman" is pretty low, wouldn't you agree?
 
If WWE didn't have better propsects like Rusev, Ambrose, Cesaro, Rollins- I'd see your point.

WWE has so much young talent right now that someone like Reigns is about the 4th or 5th best option of someone to strap the rocket to.

I don't hate Reigns, I just don't see him as any better than say, Test, in a much stronger era of young studs than when Test was one.

What Reigns deserves right now is the IC belt to build him up slowly, maybe with a goal of giving him the title in the Elimination Chamber (I'd be booking towards an Ambrose rumble run, Reigns EC win, and Rollins cashing in for a WM Triple Threat)

3 of those are already getting a fantastic push. As much as I'd like Cesaro to be that guy, there's a lot more work to do to make him a credible main event competitor. Anyone from the Shield is already at that level in the eyes of your average fan.

The IC title is far beneath Reigns at this point, it's simply not the belt it used to be and Ambrose, Rollins and Reigns have all far surpassed that level now.

Money in the Bank is the modern day IC title and Rollins already has that.

Reigns is over more than Test could ever dream to be any stage in his career. You don't go and blow that buzz for such a marketable figure by giving him a low-midcard belt and completely kill his momentum in the process.
 

strobogo

Banned
You know what I've really soured on? The disparaging attitude some people around here and on the internet in general have towards indie wrestling - it's always high school gyms and bingo halls with these people. Like the fact that a promotion's running a National Guard Armoury matters more than the fact that there's a rabid, sold-out crowd loving the action they've paid good money to see, rather than sitting on their hands.

Also, it's entirely possible to see Roman's potential but, at the same time, not be entirely sold on him as a top-level performer. For me, I need to see more of him in the ring, in a greater variety of matches and I'd like to see him add some more basic moves to his war crate. He's got his moves of doom down, now he just needs to work on the stuff in between.

Other things I've really soured on; the phrase "indie darling" and the idea that there's some sort of WrassleGAF hive-mind.

lolindiewrestling

This. Don't say anything negative about Michael Elgin on twitter, unless you're willing to get into a full-blown argument with him.

Also, lolindiewrestling. I'm going to tweet out that Elgin doesn't seem so strong or something and see if he argues with me.
 

Showaddy

Member
3 of those are already getting a fantastic push. As much as I'd like Cesaro to be that guy, there's a lot more work to do to make him a credible main event competitor. Anyone from the Shield is already at that level in the eyes of your average fan.

The IC title is far beneath Reigns at this point, it's simply not the belt it used to be and Ambrose, Rollins and Reigns have all far surpassed that level now.

Money in the Bank is the modern day IC title and Rollins already has that.

Reigns is over more than Test could ever dream to be any stage in his career. You don't go and blow that buzz for such a marketable figure by giving him a low-midcard belt and completely kill his momentum in the process.

But if they give the belt to Reigns when he still can't wrestle or work a mic worth shit then he'll flop. Instead of ending up with Cena 2.0 for the next 10 years why don't they just take a year or 2 to build him up slowly so when they shove him down our throats at least we'll have a top guy worth a damn.
 
How come you guys are so mean?

iWdIHsmJMWYzh.gif
 
id wish they ditch money in the bank, and replace it with winning the intercontinental belt to cash in for a world championship match later down the line. or atleast rack up enough match point wins as inter. champion for the WWE belt.
 
D

Deleted member 47027

Unconfirmed Member
Okay good. I was worried that you had sexual intercourse with a "drunk woman" that was "looking for some action" even though her judgment was potentially impaired due to the effects of alcohol. I mean, taking advantage of a "drunk woman" is pretty low, wouldn't you agree?

She went all in before she even had a drop
 

Verendus

Banned
But if they give the belt to Reigns when he still can't wrestle or work a mic worth shit then he'll flop. Instead of ending up with Cena 2.0 for the next 10 years why don't they just take a year or 2 to build him up slowly so when they shove him down our throats at least we'll have a top guy worth a damn.
They really don't need to.

Cena is the perfect example of what you're saying. He got the title when he was still terrible in the ring. And a couple months later, fans rejected him but that didn't stop the WWE. They carried on with his push and by 2007, he was finally the definitive top star and they've carried on since with him at the top. He improved from terrible to decent/good at his style in the ring too in that time period.

They can do the same with Reigns. He has the look, and he has crowd support at the moment. Sure his mic skills and ring work need improvement, but that can happen whilst they're booking him at the top. Competent mic skills won't take long (he doesn't need to be The Rock or Jericho), and WWE has shown they care little about great in-ring work at the top. More experienced wrestlers can help hide those weaknesses whilst he's getting his first big run.

What I'm saying is, Cena was as manufactured as they come when he went to the top. And Reigns can easily be his replacement if they give him the same push. No one is going to be saying he's not worthy of being a top star once he streamrolls the entire roster in a period of two years like Cena did back in the day. You'll eventually accept it. Just like people did with Cena.
 

Showaddy

Member
They really don't need to.

Cena is the perfect example of what you're saying. He got the title when he was still terrible in the ring. And a couple months later, fans rejected him but that didn't stop the WWE. They carried on with his push and by 2007, he was finally the definitive top star and they've carried on since with him at the top. He improved from terrible to decent/good at his style in the ring too in that time period.

They can do the same with Reigns. He has the look, and he has crowd support at the moment. Sure his mic skills and ring work need improvement, but that can happen whilst they're booking him at the top. Competent mic skills won't take long (he doesn't need to be The Rock or Jericho), and WWE has shown they care little about great in-ring work at the top. More experienced wrestlers can help hide those weaknesses whilst he's getting his first big run.

What I'm saying is, Cena was as manufactured as they come when he went to the top. And Reigns can easily be his replacement if they give him the same push. No one is going to be saying he's not worthy of being a top star once he streamrolls the entire roster in a period of two years like Cena did back in the day. You'll eventually accept it. Just like people did with Cena.

I dunno feels like Reigns is even worse than Cena at this point. Cena was at least wrestling solo and had a character with a wrestling style of sorts, Reigns is just a medium
sized guy who does nothing but finish off other peoples matches and promos.
 

strobogo

Banned
Cena really sucked in the ring and still got over huge even before the massive push. His debut match with Kurt was good, but that was Kurt in his prime. Cena was pretty garbage in the ring from 2002-2004, but got super over because of his character. He got over having shit matches with Renee Dupree. And he's been the face of the company since. Roman is more exciting of a wrestler now than Cena was at the same point. He also started getting over pretty organically as the big big push didn't really start until recently.

The fans chose Roman to be the top guy of Shield before WWE did, just like they chose Cena before WWE did. Cena wasn't going to amount to dick before the rapper gimmick caught on. People loved Cena and then hated him because they got what they wanted, because wrestling fans are assholes that will turn on absolutely everything.
 

Verendus

Banned
Cena really sucked in the ring and still got over huge even before the massive push. His debut match with Kurt was good, but that was Kurt in his prime. Cena was pretty garbage in the ring from 2002-2004, but got super over because of his character. He got over having shit matches with Renee Dupree. And he's been the face of the company since. Roman is more exciting of a wrestler now than Cena was at the same point. He also started getting over pretty organically as the big big push didn't really start until recently.

The fans chose Roman to be the top guy of Shield before WWE did, just like they chose Cena before WWE did. Cena wasn't going to amount to dick before the rapper gimmick caught on. People loved Cena and then hated him because they got what they wanted, because wrestling fans are assholes that will turn on absolutely everything.
I don't think wrestling fans turned on him because they're assholes. It's because fans at the time were behind Brotista and he became huge at the time by beating enemy number one in Triple H. When Cena came to Raw, Brotista was the biggest star and went to Smackdown, and fans basically said 'Fuck you' to Cena as the star because they were already behind someone else. Batista didn't run into the same problem for a couple years even though he was doing the same thing Cena was doing. It didn't help that Cena's rapper gimmick looked corny as shit next to cocky, arrogant face Batista.

WWE just pulled the trigger on Cena to Raw too quickly to make him the face of company. It's even worse in retrospect because he didn't really become the real leading star until 2007 so they pretty much screwed themselves over. They could've probably waited a year or so and avoided any problems. It wasn't like Cena was going anywhere. I think he's in his mid-thirties now so they had all the time in the world but they were probably desperate.

This is also what they should be aware of with Reigns. He has good crowd support right now, but if Bryan is coming back, they need to do the smart thing and keep them both looking strong and good. Last thing I want to see is another backlash against a top star, but it seems like Cena's booking over the past 9 years has made that inevitable for any star WWE choose to book as the next big thing.
 

Carnby

Member
Guys,

I was arrested last night for going through the EZ Pass lane without EZ Pass. I'm now in jail and I opted out of my one phone call so I could make one post on WrassleGAF. Can some please post my bail?

Thanks guys. I owe ya one.
 
Guys,

I was arrested last night for going through the EZ Pass lane without EZ Pass. I'm now in jail and I opted out of my one phone call so I could make one post on WrassleGAF. Can some please post my bail?

Thanks guys. I owe ya one.

I sent £1 to America. That should cover it.
 
The Roman Reigns hate has totally soured Wrassle GAF for me. After decrying the lack of new stars being properly built up for years, they have gradually built up a future mega star very carefully for two years and he hasn't dropped the ball once in that time. He's athletic, performed well in the ring so far (and has improved in the ring at a dramatic rate), has a fantastic look (and yes, this will always matter), and has the fans well and truly on board.

He's a star that has enormous drawing potential in the future and if you can't see that then quit complaining and go back to watching indie wrestling in school gyms because the WWE is never going to be for you. No one wanted to see Batista back in the main event but to compare Reigns to a 45 year old part timer, is absurd.

tumblr_inline_n8kr4hrlAl1sc3qzx.gif


The fans chose Roman to be the top guy of Shield before WWE did

You're underestimating WWE.
 

strobogo

Banned
I don't think wrestling fans turned on him because they're assholes. It's because fans at the time were behind Brotista and he became huge at the time by beating enemy number one in Triple H. When Cena came to Raw, Brotista was the biggest star and went to Smackdown, and fans basically said 'Fuck you' to Cena as the star because they were already behind someone else. Batista didn't run into the same problem for a couple years even though he was doing the same thing Cena was doing. It didn't help that Cena's rapper gimmick looked corny as shit next to cocky, arrogant face Batista.

WWE just pulled the trigger on Cena to Raw too quickly to make him the face of company. It's even worse in retrospect because he didn't really become the real leading star until 2007 so they pretty much screwed themselves over. They could've probably waited a year or so and avoided any problems. It wasn't like Cena was going anywhere. I think he's in his mid-thirties now so they had all the time in the world but they were probably desperate.

This is also what they should be aware of with Reigns. He has good crowd support right now, but if Bryan is coming back, they need to do the smart thing and keep them both looking strong and good. Last thing I want to see is another backlash against a top star, but it seems like Cena's booking over the past 9 years has made that inevitable for any star WWE choose to book as the next big thing.


Wrestling fans: Beg for Paige to get called up, get super hyped when she does. 3 weeks later, they start bitching about lolpaigewins

Wrestling fans: Beg for Bryan to get the big push and start winning matches. Start bitching right away lolbryanwins.


Wrestling fans are absolutely assholes who will bitch over everything, even things they want.
 

Ithil

Member
Yeah, saying the fans picked Roman before WWE did is complete baloney. He's always been the strongest booked of the Shield.

Pretty much, it was very obvious from the start they intended him to be the "top guy" breaking out of the group. Never mind that Roman got over with the fans through very strong booking and the main focus being on him.

Acting like WWE were just forced to go along with the fans demands for Roman is ridiculous.
 
Yeah, saying the fans picked Roman before WWE did is complete baloney. He's always been the strongest booked of the Shield.

There are plenty of hard pushed guys in the WWE that flopped. The lack of World title reigns for guys like Nathan Jones and Matt Morgan show that. Reigns has a star quality about him, regardless of the fact he never got "THIS IS AWESOME" chants in front of 700 fans at an ROH show.
 

Evening Musuko

Black Korea
But how will we make room for such memorable PPVs like "Payback" or "Battleground"?

I actually liked Payback and Battleground looks to be fun lol. It can't be worse than last years, right?

Tournaments don't draw.

Which explains why the last couple of times they had KOTR, it was on TV.

But there's New Japan and they have plenty of tournaments so It's all good. At least tournaments draw over there!
 
There are plenty of hard pushed guys in the WWE that flopped. The lack of World title reigns for guys like Nathan Jones and Matt Morgan show that. Reigns has a star quality about him, regardless of the fact he never got "THIS IS AWESOME" chants in front of 700 fans at an ROH show.

They've gotten pretty good at protecting people that they want to protect. If Reigns was out there cutting RANDY'S BITCH! promos RANDY'S BITCH! and wrestling RANDY'S BITCH! singles matches every week, he would be another Matt RANDY'S BITCH! Mortgan and Nathan RANDY'S BITCH! Jones.
 

Ithil

Member
There are plenty of hard pushed guys in the WWE that flopped. The lack of World title reigns for guys like Nathan Jones and Matt Morgan show that. Reigns has a star quality about him, regardless of the fact he never got "THIS IS AWESOME" chants in front of 700 fans at an ROH show.

It's a little bit early to say he has or hasn't flopped. Regardless of his supposed "star quality".
 

strobogo

Banned
Roman definitely wasn't booked the strongest of the group for the first 7-8 months. He was just the muscle guy. He was in the Batista in Evolution role. Well before Batista was going to be the next top guy. Just the big muscle enforcer. But much like Batista, he got over doing the same thing anyway.

Internet marky wieners can't accept that Roman is less talented than Dean and Rollins, but has more of the it factor and star quality.


If Roman was the most pushed guy from the start, he would have been the one to face Undertaker on Smackdown, not Dean.
 

Ithil

Member
Roman definitely wasn't booked the strongest of the group for the first 7-8 months. He was just the muscle guy. He was in the Batista in Evolution role. Well before Batista was going to be the next top guy. Just the big muscle enforcer. But much like Batista, he got over doing the same thing anyway.

Internet marky wieners can't accept that Roman is less talented than Dean and Rollins, but has more of the it factor and star quality.
He got the pin in all their big matches, his spear was used to end most matches, and he was talked up the most of all three.

And you're being silly if you think Batista in Evolution wasn't supposed to become a big star.
 

Showaddy

Member
There are plenty of hard pushed guys in the WWE that flopped. The lack of World title reigns for guys like Nathan Jones and Matt Morgan show that. Reigns has a star quality about him, regardless of the fact he never got "THIS IS AWESOME" chants in front of 700 fans at an ROH show.

What exactly is the "star quality" that Reigns has? For me someone with "star quality" is Wyatt who's 2 years younger than Reigns and has been wrestling barely a year longer than him. The Indy argument flops with him as well as they're both WWE products.
 

Verendus

Banned
Wrestling fans: Beg for Paige to get called up, get super hyped when she does. 3 weeks later, they start bitching about lolpaigewins

Wrestling fans: Beg for Bryan to get the big push and start winning matches. Start bitching right away lolbryanwins.


Wrestling fans are absolutely assholes who will bitch over everything, even things they want.
But Bryan is still the most over star in the roster. I mean, I don't really like him that much in the absolute top spot, but I never have. He still gets the biggest positive reaction on the roster though, and when he returns, that'll likely continue to be massive.

And I see your point, but don't think that reflects what happened with Cena. His backlash wasn't fans being assholes. It's him being put in a position above someone else fans were behind at the time and looking sub-par in comparison.

Having said that, whoever is positioned as the next top face has one big benefit. People will love him for taking the spot from Cena, and that's one thing that will help an already popular Reigns. It's just a case of whether WWE books well beyond that.
 
Top Bottom