The Frankman
Banned
Hey, do you still beat your sister?Hey Frankman! Welcome to thread.
Are you working out?
Hey, do you still beat your sister?Hey Frankman! Welcome to thread.
Are you working out?
Hey, do you still beat your sister?
So anyway like I was saying, this angle is nuts.
So anyway like I was saying, this angle is nuts.
With all the latest round of questions and speculation on the network, weve been told that DirecTV has said they have no interest in carrying it, which right there knocks about 30% of its potential revenue off. There was talk that very few cable carriers are committing to paying a per subscriber rate for it, which is what they were counting on for profitability. The other alternative is to be like Showtime and charge a subscription fee directly to consumers. The risks of that become huge. If they get the level of response for the network that they got for 24/7, which would be a worst case scenario, the company could lose more on the network than they earn in profits on wrestling, and that would still leave the movie business to put them in the red.
Plus, 24/7 interest faded as time went on. Keep in mind thats a worst case. But with that model, breaking even would not be easy. Plus you have to factor in if they put eight or nine PPVs per year on the network, that it would eliminate much of the revenue from those events. Now, I expect theyll continue to offer the PPVs via traditional model because many people wont order the network (although the monthly network price would have to be significantly lower than the price of a single PPV). But if you can get the network for $9.95 and in exchange, WWE and your cable provider loses a monthly $44.95 or $54.95 order, that becomes a different issue. Plus, at that point you cut the value of your B shows from $44.95 to $9.95 to the average consumer.
With the promise of all the programming ordered can they get 1 million regular subscribers to the channel in North America (the only market offering it at first) when 24/7 Classics on Demand in 2010 worldwide had about 80,000 subscribers? November, the last scheduled internal launch date isnt that far off, although publicly they have not committed to any date. However, they did this past week cut a new commercial for the channel which in theory should start airing soon.
I love this week's True Long Island Story's "Where's Trent" segment. It's like watching a Jeff Hardy video made by someone who isn't semi-retarded.
Hey, do you still beat your sister?
Wouldn't work in the United States. Raw and Smackdown are on two separate, well-established cable channels.I still think WWE should forget about a network of their own. Just deal with Sky to make a Sky WWE channel, they are damn close to airing everything already.
I don't think that's fair.
i wouldnt mind if it became like showtime. Kelly Kelly can go back to doing her ecw thing.
What's he even talking about? Does Frankman beat his sister?
my grandma said Alberto Del Rio is a pendejo. and that AJ is a little brat.
my grandma said Alberto Del Rio is a pendejo. and that AJ is a little brat.
this (dvr of Monday) was actually the first she seen Sin Cara. shesaid she just wants John Cena to come and beat up Del Rio, and Big Show, and everybody.Does your nana love Sin Cara?
Who is that? Oan Heart? Too soon, Kog.
Nope that Mr. America.
Nobody knows who he is. I suppose we'll never find out.
I'd recognize that fella next to Doynk though, good ol' Big Shoe.
Just finished watch the great american bash smackdown and loved it. It was a fun light-hearted show with some good segments and matches and i enjoyed it.
Wow, she looks really scary in that video. Anyone know if her and Rodney Mack are still married?
Update on the WWE Network (via Meltzer):
She has embraced the funk! You should do the same!Damnit Layla no
She has embraced the funk! You should do the same!
She has embraced the funk! You should do the same!
She's obviously mocking the fat guy.
Look at Kofi's irrelevant ass just looking!
I really think WWE network might be the death of WWE.
Its clearly a really bad idea that will cost them tens of millions in the time where they are only barely making any money.
The entire wrestling industry and not just WWE are in a slump in terms over everything. Live attendance, TV ratings, merch sales, recognizable characters etc, All are the lowest they have been since the early-mid 90's and things show no sign of turning around.
Its just not time for this kind of money gamble.
Tossing in PPV's wont do shit as well. It will just mean less people buying PPV's. The current people buying them will just get the WWE network and the people streaming them on janky streams will continue to do that because its free. I dont see any growth there.
As for watching archive footage meh. Thanks to the internet I have and can every classic match I remember from my childhoot so many times it would be silly to pay to see them again. I dont really need to see the Bret vs Shawn Iron Man match again.
But for god sake then need to talk to the World Wildlife Fund about using the attitude WWF logo for archive footage because when 25% of the footage has to be blurred out I would rather watch the match on youtube or dailymotion that some guy ripped from his VCR.
If this network happens I am saying within 2-3 years WWE will ether be no more or Vince wont be in charge.