My biggest problem with the WWE is that they can'd decide on if they are scripted programming or if they are improvised.
I mean lets look at HHH's promo to Booker T
Now there are 4 ways that a promo can be on TV
- It was scripted word for word for HHH to say which means that the writers as well as Vince okayed this
- It was bulletpointed for HHH and he came up with the language on the spot
- Triple H was told to create the most racist language he possible could for this promo
- Triple H said those words of his own free will.
Now you say that if the story is Booker T overcoming the odds and becoming the champion at mania. But that isn't what they did. Infact they made Booker T look weak in a loss.
A loss for what reason? So HHH could feud with Kevin Nash? So HHH could fued over a fake title with his friends while Booker T is sent to midcard hell?
The story didn't make sense, the money didn't make sense(Triple H already had mania wins at 16 and 18 which were failures in the grand scheme of things as they did very little to build him up or generate great business).
So who was the person who thought that calling Booker T a thug at Mania and having Lawler say some of the worst things ever.
Ok so then if that was the story that they wanted then why was that match overlooked in
The Mania of Wrestlemania documentary?
Does the groomed future CEO of the WWE really think that was entertainment?