Razgriz-Specter
Member
I wonder how many people in that pic with Pratt will live to the end of the movie who aren't Pratt.
Im actually feeling a twist with Pratt dying.
I wonder how many people in that pic with Pratt will live to the end of the movie who aren't Pratt.
Im actually feeling a twist with Pratt dying.
Colin blushing HARD.To the right of her shoulder is a Hasbro TLW Bull T-Rex toy!
And then the vehicle boxes on the bottom mid are part of the canned 3 3/4" scale humans/vehicles from JW.
Colin blushing HARD.
Dude's got a sunburn
I did a little work to the music video I edited, decided that the intro with the full Hammond scene was way too long so I cut that short and to the point which gets to the stuff quicker. I'll repost whenever I get it online for anyone interested. I had fun doing this one and I'm thinking about doing another.
The Lost World pretty much blows. Watchable but I feel like it's completely useless and when it's almost being good there's something stupid to ruin it. The raptor encounter at the end is alright until the stupid kick and Sarah's goofy Mouse Trap roll through several sets only to be intercepted by them completely destroys it. The story adds nothing of worth. At least Jurassic World makes the third movie more relevant with Hoskins' backstory, Ingen still meddling behind the scenes, etc. and as I said before, the raptor focus and progression.
The original ended Hammond's character arc perfectly and the sequel throws it out by having him still trying to throw people into peril for no reason. His idea of having some researchers on the island to document the dinosaurs is going to lead to some glorious redo of the park... how? I'm not sure what his game plan is there, and his nephew's is even dumber. Ugly movie full of stupid characters and ideas. Does nothing for the story.
I kind of wish JP3 would be renamed to something without a number so I could just consider that the second movie. It's not great but I think it's better, much more fun, much less stupid, and has elements that can at least tie around to the first movie and the fourth. I'd re-title it to Jurassic Journey or something. It'd be cool if all the movies were called "Jurassic" something if only for consistency. No one's going to agree but uh, well there it is.
I don't agree with it, but more on the lack of feathers entirely:
Continuity is fine, but Terra Novas dinos getting in the way of new dinos sporting plumage is a bummer. Anyways, I think this puts to rest the notion that no feathers was a strictly Trevorrow thing. Perhaps Jurassic World 2..
And Malcolm is just too good.
They both should hook up one last time regardless now that Ellie is married off.Malcolm was a hell of a lot more interesting in 2 than Grant in 3.
Quoted for the truth. Hell I even hate most of the main characters in the sequels, lol.Both JP sequels are dumb trash. The original is the only good film.
I will remember this.Both JP sequels are dumb trash. The original is the only good film.
Both JP sequels are dumb trash. The original is the only good film.
Correct. I re-read TLW this week, and a lot of blame can be laid at Crichton's feet for that. Nothing happens until two thirds of the way through, and all the character deaths are meaningless, except maybe Dodgson's.
Well, the TLW novel is pretty different from the movie(and also bad).
For me JP2 was the logical sequel to JP1. It had more dinosaurs, more action, more malcolm.
"Jurassic Park is like Star Wars. Different directors can give a different taste to each movie, I would be involved in some way, but not as director."
Trevorrow not directing the sequel
I respect that and it's sounding like he really poured everything he could into this movie.
Fine by me so long as Gareth Edwards stays away.
Malcolm was a hell of a lot more interesting in 2 than Grant in 3.
Trevorrow not directing the sequel
I respect that and it's sounding like he really poured everything he could into this movie.
Not at all. Guy was practically a different character who somehow was more informed and experienced than he had any right to be. Not to mention that he is a smartass who has no experience with paleontology and barely any experience with the actual living Dinosaurs in the first film. Malcom is the one character who had more right to be dead than Muldoon.
=[Fine by me so long as Gareth Edwards stays away.
Grant is way more likable and a far more sensible character to be a protagonist in these movies. But the one thing that separates Grant and Malcolm, as protagonists, is that one has a character arc and the other does not. They actually had Grant in a situation that was alluded to in the first movie when it asks the question about how dinosaur research and such would go after Jurassic Park. The park animals are genetic hybrids and still not real dinosaurs so I think research should continue as usual, but I got the implication that since those events happened that paleontologists were beginning to have a harder time finding funding.
Not at all. Guy was practically a different character who somehow was more informed and experienced than he had any right to be. Not to mention that he is a smartass who has no experience with paleontology and barely any experience with the actual living Dinosaurs in the first film. Malcom is the one character who had more right to be dead than Muldoon.
Trevorrow not directing the sequel
I respect that and it's sounding like he really poured everything he could into this movie.
Yeah, he's directed several awful films. Oh wait...Fine by me so long as Gareth Edwards stays away.
TLW: Malcolm is a pariah in his field and ridiculed by everyone at the start of TLW as a result of JP1, and is vindicated by the end. His relationship with Sarah and his daughter are hanging on by a thread in the beginning, but they get closer as a result of the events that unfold.
This has me bummed. Last summer he was definitely talking about the potential, but as soon as he started announcing all his solo projects I knew that was the direction he was going. Hopefully they do a good job finding a director for the sequel!
The guy did what he did with Godzilla because A) that's what Godzilla films do. And B) He was inspired by Spielberg with Jaws and Jurassic Park.Yeah, he's directed several awful films. Oh wait...
The guy did what he did with Godzilla because A) that's what Godzilla films do. And B) He was inspired by Spielberg with Jaws and Jurassic Park.
People need to stop pretending Godzilla 2014 was devoid of monster action. Sure, Godzilla was teased often but this was not unlike your typical superhero origin story where we don't get to see the hero in full get up until the last act or so. But the villain monsters were onscreen plenty enough for this type of movie.
Monsters had a scene straight off a page from Spielberg, I actually wouldn't mind him directing a dinosaur flick.
I agree. I see no reason to believe he couldn't direct a good JP film after watching Monsters and Godzilla.The guy did what he did with Godzilla because A) that's what Godzilla films do. And B) He was inspired by Spielberg with Jaws and Jurassic Park.
People need to stop pretending Godzilla 2014 was devoid of monster action. Sure, Godzilla was teased often but this was not unlike your typical superhero origin story where we don't get to see the hero in full get up until the last act or so. But the villain monsters were onscreen plenty enough for this type of movie.
Monsters had a scene straight off a page from Spielberg, I actually wouldn't mind him directing a dinosaur flick.
It was all tease for not enough payoff if you ask me. Plus faking a death more than once, like really? That and it was just way too slowly paced.
I actually thought the idea of catching small but powerful glimpses of Godzilla and it being sort of a incidental element of a smaller character-driven story was a cool idea (even if it's sort of a rehash of his earlier film Monsters). It just fell apart for me when the character stuff was a complete slog, which in turn made me impatiently wanting Godzilla to appear throughout the entire film.
I actually thought the idea of catching small but powerful glimpses of Godzilla and it being sort of a incidental element of a smaller character-driven story was a cool idea (even if it's sort of a rehash of his earlier film Monsters). It just fell apart for me when the character stuff was a complete slog, which in turn made me impatiently wanting Godzilla to appear throughout the entire film.
Trevorrow not directing the sequel
I respect that and it's sounding like he really poured everything he could into this movie.
Anyone into the merchandise know what scale the RC JP1 Jeep is?
Eh screw it, bought it either way.
Now where is my Ford Explorer?
Personally, I would like JW to be a completely close-ended film with no clear aspirations of having continuations. Unlike Star Wars, Jurassic Park/World is not a whole new universe. It's a tiny island in Costa Rica.
The story is the universe though and if this movie sets up for more in an organic way that makes sense, I'm down for that.