BananasWithGuns
Member
I'll miss Deadspin, that's about it.
Having the opinion that Gawker deserved what they got in this ruling makes a person a Gater now? I don't understand.Ah, so Gaters.
Speaking of which, a second glance at this topic reveals there's a fair few of them right here. Goodie.
Having the opinion that Gawker deserved what they got in this ruling makes a person a Gater now? I don't understand.
Well Jezebel condemned the "fappening" stuff, while it was Gawker proper that did the Hogan stuff iirc. Still not a good look.
Lesson: Don't fuck with judges.![]()
lol
RIP
I'll miss Deadspin, that's about it.
Like who?
Name names man.
Well I, and a lot of my friends, won. One of the most important persons in our lifes. God... I'm so happy right now. Wreck 'em Hulkster! Bless' ya!Is it? Is it good on Hogan? I kind of feel like we all lost here.
I'll miss Deadspin, that's about it.
Hulk honestly is more deserving of it, legally, given that his career really WAS destroyed by it. Granted, he pretty much deserves to get fucked for all the racist shit, but the law doesn't deal in karma.
are people really suggesting GG is an element of this as if its some sort of quasi mitigating factor?
I've not followed GG, i couldn't tell you anyone other than a few of the main individuals i've seen surrounding the issues, let alone say which sites are pro or against on the issues ut one thing i do know is over the years Gawker has outed people from the closet, posted sex tapes, condemned people for having seen fappening images etc etc etc and for that reason i'm happy a gutter rag is being shit on and karma is biting its ass
Hate to say it but outside of Tumblr, Gaf and Twitter next to nobody has heard of Gamer Gate Conversely a lot of people will have seen Gawker 'news' articles on social meida etc or are aware of its subsidiaries
I'm sure some GGers will be happy with this, but its in now way fueled by it
+1. They seemed like the only site that was consistently practicing journalism in between the standard Gawker Media moments of hypocritical indignation.
didn't Gawker condemn people for showing 'the fappening' images
but is fine with the sex tape?
His career was destroyed because of the racist shit he said. I find it pretty tragic that people are siding with Hulk in this. Gawker is a shitty corporation with a lot of innocent employees, Hulk is just a piece of shit. Admittedly it all does come down to how the law works, but it just goes to show the law isn't always about serving justice.
Dear Gawker:
![]()
Jezebel's response to "the fappening" was uh...interesting.
-First, they reported on the Jennifer Lawrence photos (I guess they were the first that came out) and INCLUDED A LINK TO THE IMAGE GALLERY.
-Then they took down the link.
-Later, they went full-on into saying that people who viewed the images were basically complicit in being sex abusers, ignoring the fact that they all obviously viewed the images themselves and even provided a link to them in their initial report, so others could view them as well.
No it doesn't.
His career was destroyed because of the racist shit he said. I find it pretty tragic that people are siding with Hulk in this. Gawker is a shitty corporation with a lot of innocent employees, Hulk is just a piece of shit. Admittedly it all does come down to how the law works, but it just goes to show the law isn't always about serving justice.
Gawker published a sex tape of Hogan. They claimed it was within their first amendment rights to do so. Hogan claimed it was defamation or something. Gawker won. Hogan appealed, but filed the appeal in Florida in a jurisdiction where he is a local celebrity, owns a business, and responsible for a lot of the area's income and basically because of Hulk, he put that entire area on the map, so there was widespread speculation that he would deliver a crushing defeat to Gawker. Hogan won (just now). Gawker can appeal again, but it doesn't matter because in order to even appeal you have to post bond of $50m, and they don't have $50m and can't get $50m.
In short, Gawker is dead. It's finished. RIP
Jezebel's response to "the fappening" was uh...interesting.
-First, they reported on the Jennifer Lawrence photos (I guess they were the first that came out) and INCLUDED A LINK TO THE IMAGE GALLERY.
-Then they took down the link.
-Later, they went full-on into saying that people who viewed the images were basically complicit in being sex abusers, ignoring the fact that they all obviously viewed the images themselves and even provided a link to them in their initial report, so others could view them as well.
Having the opinion that Gawker deserved what they got in this ruling makes a person a Gater now? I don't understand.
GG may not go that far outside of those three areas (don't forget Reddit), but it absolutely has presence outside of them too - my aunt for instance is an avid reader and follows the Hugo Awards, so she knows a lot about GG.
Tell that to all the peoples whose lives have been ruined by Gawker.His career was destroyed because of the racist shit he said. I find it pretty tragic that people are siding with Hulk in this. Gawker is a shitty corporation with a lot of innocent employees, Hulk is just a piece of shit. Admittedly it all does come down to how the law works, but it just goes to show the law isn't always about serving justice.
This is an insane and ridiculous punishment. People wreck the economy and get golden parachutes but a tabloid website shittily refused to remove a sex tape and they basically give them the death sentence. I'm fine with them losing but that $115m is just wrong.
His career was destroyed because of the racist shit he said. I find it pretty tragic that people are siding with Hulk in this. Gawker is a shitty corporation with a lot of innocent employees, Hulk is just a piece of shit. Admittedly it all does come down to how the law works, but it just goes to show the law isn't always about serving justice.
Whilst that may be so, and i may be downplaying GG too much, the point i'm illustrating is Gawker media is begger than that, and has gotten its reputation long before it, so the suggestions that the hate now and that those who are enjoying its downfall are in some way related to GG is down right idiotic and frankly insulting
also awesome user name
oh jeez i didn't realize it happened like that.
Same ownership group,but technically separate sites. Still looked terrible.Rip in pieces gawker. Aren't they the site that refused to take the video down, but cried fowl when a woman had her sex tape shared?
didn't Gawker condemn people for showing 'the fappening' images
but is fine with the sex tape?
Then they file Chapter 11 bankruptcy most likelyI don't understand how these lawsuits work. What if Gawker is worth less than the $115m?
I don't understand how these lawsuits work. What if Gawker is worth less than the $115m?
Protecting privacy isn't justice?
Tell that to all the peoples whose lives have been ruined by Gawker.
Jurors in Hulk Hogan’s sex video trial on Wednesday heard a videotaped deposition of Gawker’s former editor in chief — saying he’d draw the line at posting the sex tape of a celebrity who is under 4 years old.
A.J. Daulerio, 41, was sitting ramrod straight in the Florida courtroom during the awkward moment when he was asked on video by Hogan’s lawyer, “Can you imagine a situation where a celebrity sex tape would not be newsworthy?”
Daulerio answered flatly, “If they were a child.”
“Under what age?” attorney Charles Harder asked.
“Four,” he said.
“No four-year-old sex tapes, OK,” Harder said.
I'm sure this has already been posted, but this is the caliber of person who was working at Gawker. From the trial:
Fucking dancing around the room that these scumfucks are done and dusted. And yes, that was probably the classic Gawker 'snark', and no, I don't give a fuck.