Yes. They are totally fucked, even if lawyers play games with Gawker's assets.Are the tweets going around about Denton & Daulerio being found personally liable accurate?
Yes. They are totally fucked, even if lawyers play games with Gawker's assets.Are the tweets going around about Denton & Daulerio being found personally liable accurate?
Ah, so Gaters.
Speaking of which, a second glance at this topic reveals there's a fair few of them right here. Goodie.
Yeah, Gawker have done some awful shit but I can't help but feel like if this was any other company not embroiled in GG shit, with the most popular GG community named after them, the reaction would be very different.
Yeah, Gawker have done some awful shit but I can't help but feel like if this was any other company not embroiled in GG shit, with the most popular GG community named after them, the reaction would be very different.
There's like 10 different wrongs colliding here.
Gawker main site is horrid and deserve it, but it's also somehow depressing that a jury probably put a pile of people out of jobs because they just liked the idea of giving a racist wrestling celebrity a huge pile of cash.
real mature stuff
Nobody likes Gawker. GG just happens to be another (particularly shitty) group of people that hates them.Yeah, Gawker have done some awful shit but I can't help but feel like if this was any other company not embroiled in GG shit, with the most popular GG community named after them, the reaction would be very different.
Do you not remember when they ruined a man's life for no reason? They're the worst of the worst.
Yup. I posted that on the other page. If this didn't get Gawker something else would have. They've been begging to be smacked down like this for years now.
I didn't say Gawker was innocent. I said gloating and posting gifs celebrating their demise is a bit harsh.
Yeah, Gawker have done some awful shit but I can't help but feel like if this was any other company not embroiled in GG shit, with the most popular GG community named after them, the reaction would be very different.
There's something disgusting about people reveling in glee at a racist earning 115m after an awful tabloid leaked a sex tape of him, and that this could result in a bunch of people losing their jobs. This is all kind of horrible, people finding joy shitting on Gawker and laughing at Hogan is terrible.
We won't give pause until the blood is flowing
So you are fine with it if a company would publish videos or photos of you online with no permission at all, when the material involved isn't for the public good?I don't like the media can be held liable for publishing factual damaging information. Many times there are videos or information published about somebody or something that is damaging but that can be a good thing. If we try to judge the information on its benefit to society it becomes an arbitrary and slippery slope.
Can someone like Ray Rice sue the media for damages because they publish video of him him beating his wife?
Nope. All the utterly disgusting shit Gawker has done over the years has lead to this. They have no one to blame but themselves and they deserve it.
Huh. What evidence could they possibly have? WTF, lol.Appeal is coming.
![]()
Fucking what?Note #2: nick denton was confident that claiming his grandparents were holocaust survivors would win him the case - that was seriously his opening statement.
Nick Denton got some African blood in him.Huh. What evidence could they possibly have? WTF, lol.
Fucking what?This whole thing is so bizarre.
I honestly feel terrible for all the people who work at Gawker-owned sites. None of them had any part in this. It was all on the bosses, and their hubris.
From Cnet's article.The jury found Nick Denton, Gawker's founder and a defendant in the case, personally liable in the case. They also found against Albert Daulerio, the site's former editor.
Maybe this will teach Kotaku to not shit on its constituents when they are reliant on them for hits if they get picked up by someone else.
There's like 10 different wrongs colliding here.
Gawker main site is horrid and deserve it, but it's also somehow depressing that a jury probably put a pile of people out of jobs because they just liked the idea of giving a racist wrestling celebrity a huge pile of cash.
I'm celebrating Gawker's loss more than Bollea's win. Perhaps the ruling will dissuade trash sites from publishing sex tapes and intimate images without the consent of those depicted.
Awww.
Dude is talented. Hope he recovers swiftly.
Ya'll are cold blooded. Yea Gawker was in the wrong here, but a lot of good people could lose their jobs over this. Over something they had no part in.
Nobody likes Gawker. GG just happens to be another (particularly shitty) group of people that hates them.
Bollocks to that. Check my post history for how vociferous I've been against Gators.
Cool, so you're pro revenge porn then? I mean if you're going to ignore that this tape was stolen, posted without either parties permission, told to taken down by a judge, and then not, it kinda seems like you're pro revenge porn, or at least as long as the person is shitty.
Even Hulk Hogans penis length ended up being discussed in court. The trial was just bonkers.Fucking what?This whole thing is so bizarre.
I've been in bed for 20 hours sick, my drug addled roommate broke into my room and destroyed my tv yesterday, and soon I'm going to have to get well enough to go take care of my seriously ill mother, and this is exactly what I needed to feel better.
Thank God for Hulk Hogan.
no one gives a fuck about the sex tape itself, the only issue is the racist shit. not sure how you can reward him for that
Even racists have rights and expect them to not be violated.
If I shoot a racist illegally, I'll still be arrested and tried for a crime
No it doesn't.What Hogan said was pretty awful on every level....
....but destroying Gawker does help make up for it.
Even racists have rights and expect them to not be violated.
If I shoot a racist illegally, I'll still be arrested and tried for a crime
I dont much of this case. I assume Gawker released a sex tape without his permission?
$115 million is crazy money. I thought that ESPN lady got a massive payout for her hotel vid and now I see this.
didn't Gawker condemn people for showing 'the fappening' images
but is fine with the sex tape?
Why so much money though ? People get killed or end up disabled and they get a few millions but this guy gets 115M$ for revenge porn ?
Now I'm not saying he doesn't deserve a big compensation and I'm glad Gawker is getting fucked over this but I don't see why you would award him more than 10M$.