How can this be real?I'm sure this has already been posted, but this is the caliber of person who was working at Gawker. From the trial:
Fucking dancing around the room that these scumfucks are done and dusted. And yes, that was probably the classic Gawker 'snark', and no, I don't give a fuck.
EDIT: New York Times link
I'm sure this has already been posted, but this is the caliber of person who was working at Gawker. From the trial:
Fucking dancing around the room that these scumfucks are done and dusted. And yes, that was probably the classic Gawker 'snark', and no, I don't give a fuck.
EDIT: New York Times link
Having the opinion that Gawker deserved what they got in this ruling makes a person a Gater now? I don't understand.
Funny how snark doesn't come across on court transcripts.
And Daulerio was found personally liable, so his life is totally fucked. I bet he wishes that he hadn't acted like such an asshole in the trial.I'm sure this has already been posted, but this is the caliber of person who was working at Gawker. From the trial:
Fucking dancing around the room that these scumfucks are done and dusted. And yes, that was probably the classic Gawker 'snark', and no, I don't give a fuck.
EDIT: New York Times link
Gawker's fate was sealed with this deposition. Dude came off like a massive shithead and jury buried them for it.I'm sure this has already been posted, but this is the caliber of person who was working at Gawker. From the trial:
Fucking dancing around the room that these scumfucks are done and dusted. And yes, that was probably the classic Gawker 'snark', and no, I don't give a fuck.
EDIT: New York Times link
If that is snark then they don't get the gravity of a court case like this and they were destined to fail.
What a strange dude. You'd think you'd WANT to act a little sympathetic if you were gonna be liable for such a huge sum.he tried to walk it back in person as being 'flippant' (which, if you want the video deposition, you do get that from his pause/tone) but still I'm glad he got put personally on the hook too. Dude is fucked.
dear lord...
They basically killed his ability to earn any real amount of money as Hulk Hogan for the rest of his life. That's worth a pretty penny. Probably not $115 million, but I'd say something bigger than $10 million isn't unreasonable.
What I have learned in this topic is that if you are outraged by Gawker and are celebrating this victory you are a closet GGer and possibly a racist sympathizer.I'm sure this has already been posted, but this is the caliber of person who was working at Gawker. From the trial:
Fucking dancing around the room that these scumfucks are done and dusted. And yes, that was probably the classic Gawker 'snark', and no, I don't give a fuck.
EDIT: New York Times link
AND ruining a man's life for outing a person who was in the closet.
Having the opinion this is a fair ruling doesn't even make someone anti-Gawker, let alone a Gater. I enjoy some Gawker-owned sites but I still think they're in the wrong here.I don't have any idea of who they're claiming is a Gator, but they're not necessarily claiming that anti-Gawker = GG.
Jezebel's response to "the fappening" was uh...interesting.
-First, they reported on the Jennifer Lawrence photos (I guess they were the first that came out) and INCLUDED A LINK TO THE IMAGE GALLERY.
-Then they took down the link.
-Later, they went full-on into saying that people who viewed the images were basically complicit in being sex abusers, ignoring the fact that they all obviously viewed the images themselves and even provided a link to them in their initial report, so others could view them as well.
So basically if you're already rich you get an even bigger amount of money than if you were less rich ?
Rich people keep getting richer.
So basically if you're already rich you get an even bigger amount of money than if you were less rich ?
Rich people keep getting richer.
Whilst that may be so, and i may be downplaying GG too much, the point i'm illustrating is Gawker media is begger than that, and has gotten its reputation long before it, so the suggestions that the hate now and that those who are enjoying its downfall are in some way related to GG is down right idiotic and frankly insulting
also awesome user name
I'm sure this has already been posted, but this is the caliber of person who was working at Gawker. From the trial:
Fucking dancing around the room that these scumfucks are done and dusted. And yes, that was probably the classic Gawker 'snark', and no, I don't give a fuck.
EDIT: New York Times link
If that is snark then they don't get the gravity of a court case like this and they were destined to fail.
Exactly, which adds to the schadenfreude of this whole thing. Smarmy little shit thought he was being cute.
What a strange dude. You'd think you'd WANT to act a little sympathetic if you were gonna be liable for such a huge sum.
This will get appealed and the can will be kicked down the road for a few years as this case goes into legal limbo.
Not the last we have heard of this case.
This will get appealed and the can will be kicked down the road for a few years as this case goes into legal limbo.
Not the last we have heard of this case.
This case wasn't about Hulk being a racist cunt. It was about invasion of privacy and the damage that caused.Handing a person a ridiculous amount of money because they were caught out for being racist cunt isn't justice
This will get appealed and the can will be kicked down the road for a few years as this case goes into legal limbo.
Not the last we have heard of this case.
So basically if you're already rich you get an even bigger amount of money than if you were less rich ?
Rich people keep getting richer.
Think of it this way. If I crash into a Camry, I'm going to be on the hook for a lot less than if I crash into a Maserati.
But when I see stuff like "Maybe this will teach Kotaku to not shit on its constituents when they are reliant on them for hits if they get picked up by someone else." and self-justifying vitriol towards Kotaku writers not connected to this case, it's pretty clear to me certain elements around this topic are celebrating because they're Gaters.
If you were in an audience that was shit on by Kotaku, you were probably also a member of a games-related hate group
But when I see stuff like "Maybe this will teach Kotaku to not shit on its constituents when they are reliant on them for hits if they get picked up by someone else." and self-justifying vitriol towards Kotaku writers not connected to this case, it's pretty clear to me certain elements around this topic are celebrating because they're Gaters.
How can this be real?
He would be OK with posting a "sex tape" (abuse tape) if the child was 5 years or older?
Handing a person a ridiculous amount of money because they were caught out for being racist cunt isn't justice?
If this case had a different victim then I wouldn't have made the comment.
So basically if you're already rich you get an even bigger amount of money than if you were less rich ?
Rich people keep getting richer.
fighting game community? DOA fans? japanese animation fans? i'm sorry could you be more specific what part of a hate group i belong to?
hogan hang in there brother power up that leg drop for wrestlemania
marked himself into a jobless shoot
Sorry, that was the impression I got from your reply in the context of what the person you replied to wrote. But as I've also said, I can see some people's replies are simply celebrating the potential demise of Kotaku and whatnot and that is certainly a bit suss.Did... Did I say that? Like... At all?
This is pretty bullish on Gawker's chances of getting the bond waived and winning their appeal.Here's a good article about the case http://www.capitalnewyork.com/artic...ds-hulk-hogan-115-million-gawker-looks-appeal
Gawker could appeal on paying the bond and then appeal to get the case overturned.
dear lord...
How can someone be a mark, job, and be involved with a shoot at the same time.