John Kowalski
Banned
Worried that she's like the second worst character in her own show. :-(
...no
Worried that she's like the second worst character in her own show. :-(
Worried that she's like the second worst character in her own show. :-(
yes...
Mako is the only character that's better than her.
yes...
Ryuko is the John Cena of KLK.
Who's the worst? I kinda agree that she's the least interesting thing about her show, especially now that we've learned her motive for wanting to find out who killed her dad.
Worried that she's like the second worst character in her own show. :-(
Mako is the (one?) thing that soothes her, so heyThey're going to save the day, I just know it.
Mako is the only character that's better than her.
If Ryuko's motivation and story were interesting she'd probably be a good character. But right now it's pretty meh.
If this was Stardust Crusaders Ryuko would be Jotaro. Just there to kick ass most of the time. Except Jotaro had some awesome bursts of personality from time to time.
She is there to call other characters on their bullshit and then turn that bullshit on them; she the "straightman" to the entire narrative. Her role is to be the outsider to a world in which everyone is fully engrossed in a self-important manga narrative.
Just because she's a straightman, doesn't mean she's an interesting or even good one.
The intent behind her characterization is pretty obvious, but it's been dragged out for the whole season now. Like, it's not that I don't like her, it's that she's just kind of there. The contrast between her and Satsuki is obvious, too, but that doesn't make her a good character. She's a foil, and has been nothing but a foil, since episode one.
I really don't see that being the case. If nothing else, Ryuko is a contrasting point for all the antagonists so far, not just Satsuki, and at one point even Mako. Arguably the whole school, even, because she is the one character that has been afforded the power to exist outside of its class system, thus being the show's agent of subversion. Which has been demonstrated and applied quite frequently, if you're adamant about your opinion of her as somehow inert.
She's been posed as an agent of change, but all change has come from Satsuki, not her. She's a heroine without agency, hence the lack of inertia. There's no subversion, only submission. Ryuko displays all the trappings of delinquency, but she's so obedient that she follows every whim and rule of the school. Outside of the first episode where she arrives at the school, every battle has been reactive. She's attacked, not attacking. Even the fight club and all the conflict derived from it is driven by Mako, not her.
Foils exist to serve as a contrast to others, and that's fine for side characters, but she's the protagonist. The other characters should be serving as her foils; the student council battles should be revealing things about her, not them; and her rivalry with Satsuki should be just that, rivalry, yet it's clear in the narrative that she's nothing more than a measuring stick. That's like, disappointing, you know? Because I like the show. But Ryuko has been a foil for so long, and it's only now that this is changing. A whole season has gone by without change.
I mean look at her investigation into her dad. What has she done other than wait for somebody else to tell her who did it? She hasn't tried investigating on her own at all.
She's been posed as an agent of change, but all change has come from Satsuki, not her. She's a heroine without agency, hence the lack of inertia. There's no subversion, only submission. Ryuko displays all the trappings of delinquency, but she's so obedient that she follows every whim and rule of the school. Outside of the first episode where she arrives at the school, every battle has been reactive. She's attacked, not attacking. Even the fight club and all the conflict derived from it is driven by Mako, not her.
Foils exist to serve as a contrast to others, and that's fine for side characters, but she's the protagonist. The other characters should be serving as her foils; the student council battles should be revealing things about her, not them; and her rivalry with Satsuki should be just that, rivalry, yet it's clear in the narrative that she's nothing more than a measuring stick. That's like, disappointing, you know? Because I like the show. But Ryuko has been a foil for so long, and it's only now that this is changing. A whole season has gone by without change.
I mean...not saying that I disagree, but whom exactly is she supposed to find information about her father's death from? There is nobody aside from nudist beach (who handled her in the beginning) and Satsuki. She doesn't have a choice but to play the game. There is no other evidence of his existence anywhere.
She hasn't tried breaking into the school's record files or Satsuki's house, asking around if people knew her dad, or trying to force something out of Satsuki or Aikuro instead of playing along. She didn't even go back to the house until eight episodes in.
She hasn't tried breaking into the school's record files or Satsuki's house, asking around if people knew her dad, or trying to force something out of Satsuki or Aikuro instead of playing along. She didn't even go back to the house until eight episodes in.
I'm sure she asked around; I mean, she even asked around for Tsumugu and found his connection to Aikurou. You don't need to put her "hitting dead ends" on the show to know it happened.
She found out enough to lead her to Honnouji and Satsuki, who is directly related to the killer. I don't think she didn't find out more for lack of trying.
You have to make some pretty serious jumps to say that the Fight Club wasn't a conflict started and resolved by Ryuuko; she literally started HUNTING Satsuki's minions herself. She didn't wait to be challenged, she chomped down those clubs by herself.
And the story was clearly building up to the whole "get outside of the role they've set up for you"; now that Ryuuko is starting to play outside of everyone's rules, even Nudist Beach wants her out of the scene. They even specifically say that she is trying "too hard" for them.
You're putting a neutral as a negative; I'm not sure how the story structure counts as as a flaw, both for the show and the character.
Dunno man, in the context of this show, it holds, because Utena isn't Ryuko and Ryuko isn't Simon, and so on and so forth. In the former the reactionary behavior is set within the structure of the setting she moves in, whereas for Ryuko, the very act of arriving is a provocation. The structure of the episodes, the rituals, makes sense for Utena, but it doesn't for Ryuko - the things they subvert aren't the same, and their intent is pretty far apart. One emulates and subverts patriarchy, the other is (supposedly) an active disruption of the present order. One dreams of a princely ideal, the other is a delinquent. So the things you expect out of Utena are distant from Matoi, but even there, the very act of winning and being with Anthy is more forceful than anything Ryuko does. There's growth in reactive behavior for the former, but for the latter, even her character development is externalized to such a point that it isn't her that grows with the passing of these episodes.