wonderfuldays
Member
m0dus said:Um, are you really that naive? a 2.5" 5400rpm HD, minimum, will cost you about $65-70 for an OEM.
5400RPM confirmed?
If MS use 4200rpm one, just should be cheaper.
m0dus said:Um, are you really that naive? a 2.5" 5400rpm HD, minimum, will cost you about $65-70 for an OEM.
wonderfuldays said:2.5" hdd is NOT THAT expensive then 3.5" hdd.
Stinkles said:Hey guys
How much is a an equivalently powerful PC?
Dr_Cogent said:Hey Stinkles,
We don't fucking care.
This isn't a PC. PC's are generic tools used for much more than games.
And there is no such PC that could be configured to be equivalently powerful anyway.
viral marketer?Stinkles said:If you don't care, why are you frothing on a forum? I don't know why people are acting so SHOCKED since last week everyone on this forum was predicting this exact thing
Stinkles said:If you don't care, why are you frothing (25 negative posts on this thread alone) on a forum? I don't know why people are acting so SHOCKED since last week everyone on this forum was predicting this exact thing
Dr_Cogent said:Please, explain how what a comparitavely equivalent PC costs has any bearing on any of this.
When, all along ever since the first console, PC's cost far more. How does this support any argument you could possibly have?
rastex said:Because this is a marketplace where companies are vying for consumer dollars. So if you want an equivalent gaming experience you're going to have to put your dollars SOMEWHERE and thus must examine the alternatives. Since the PS3 doesn't exist right now, the only other option is a PC, and thus you must look at the price of the PC to get the similar gaming experience. Of course as a consumer you could just choose to forgo the experience entirely, but then you'd probably shut up about it...
Not everyone is upset about the price (although I can't see how anyone doesn't think the accessory prices are a bit high).Stinkles said:Hey guys
How much is a an equivalently powerful PC?
rusty said:Not everyone is upset about the price (although I can't see how anyone doesn't think the accessory prices are a bit high).
The core version not having a HDD (and to a lesser extent not having a wirelss controller) are what's upsetting to me...actually the fact that there are two SKUs in the first place.
oh i'm sure everyone wants sony to answer some questions right about now!Kleegamefan said:Question: will PS3 accept a standard 2.5 inch HDD or will it be proprietary like with Xbux Three $ixty
Dr_Cogent said:Please, explain how what a comparitavely equivalent PC costs has any bearing on any of this.
When, all along ever since the first console, PC's cost far more. How does this support any argument you could possibly have?
DopeyFish said:several people have already called you out on your BS before, dude.
Stop spouting this inane horseshit.
Stinkles said:Because it is a thing that costs money that you buy to play games. Yes, it does other stuff, but according to your breakdown, the other stuff it does is worth around $1000.
The point being, you get a lot for $400. The 3DO debuted at $700 about ten years ago.
The X360 is going to use Seagate LD25 series hard drives, which have 2MB cache and run at 5400rpm. It is definitely not built for speed.m0dus said:Try here
and here
And here
And these are the El-Cheapo 4200 RPM drives, not likely the kind in the 360 (which probably uses a 5400 or, hell, maybe even a 7200 RPM?)
4200 would be pretty damn slow, and not at all ideal for gaming, IMO. Personally, I hope for 7200...but it'll prolly be 5400. who knows.
Arcticfox said:The X360 is going to use Seagate LD25 series hard drives, which have 2MB cache and run at 5400rpm. It is definitely not built for speed.
Pseudo judo said:1) 85% will have the hdd.
2) It's still being readily supported by devs for caching purposes.
3) Even today casuals use the Xbox just for games and the 360 will be no different. If casual players aren't going on Live and dowlnloading rich media they don't need an hdd do they. Now MS doesn't force them to pay for something that they'll never use, as a consumer that would make me happy. What wouldn't make me happy wanting the hdd later on and paying $100 for it.
LINK
m0dus said:but falls within the $65-70+ price range. $99 is not much of a stretch, considering they want to make a profit on peripherals.
Anyone not expecting to pay $600 or more on a console - that's not Nintendo's - on launch day has never purchased a console at launch day and as usual should wait for a price drop.ChronoMagnus said:Buying the Xobx 360 at the 299.99 still means you pay $400 because of the need of a game and a memory card. Add in buying another controller and the wireless router an a HDD and your sitting at somewhere around $500-600. The Xbox360 priced at $4oo could end up costing $600-700 once you add in extra controllers, warranties, games, and premium live.
Somewhere Ken is laughing his head off. I love it how everybody says that the Ps3 wont cost anything less then $400. We all thought the same thing about the Psp and were proven wrong.
Hell even Yamuchi and Iwata are laughing.
Isnt a $200 revolution console sounding really nice now?
Pseudo judo said:2) It's still being readily supported by devs for caching purposes.
On a day filled with rich examples of idiocy, this takes the cake.Pseudo judo said:3) Even today casuals use the Xbox just for games and the 360 will be no different. If casual players aren't going on Live and dowlnloading rich media they don't need an hdd do they. Now MS doesn't force them to pay for something that they'll never use, as a consumer that would make me happy. What wouldn't make me happy wanting the hdd later on and paying $100 for it.
Angelus said:Yeah it is quite sneaky with the fact that backward compatability only works if you have the hard drive,bastards. I guess we'll see how much stock the public puts into it now that it costs extra.
Now why's that, enlighten me and relieve me of my ignorance.bishoptl said:On a day filled with rich examples of idiocy, this takes the cake.
Nerevar said:If this is true I might lay off my ragehol. I'll wait for some devs to confirm / deny this though.
LINK"From seems to be making use of the Xbox 360 hard disk for caching purposes in order to provide, as Takeuchi states, a stress-free, seamless experience (in eNCHANT arM). While it's not the case that there won't ever be a "Now Loading" screen in the game, such a screen will be very rare. This, according to Takeuchi, will be true of pretty much all Xbox 360 games, as it's something that Microsoft is taking seriously.
The Friendly Monster said:
I think most people in the past have managed to keep their launch purchases under $600....which is possible even with the X360.Pseudo judo said:Anyone not expecting to pay $600 or more on a console - that's not Nintendo's - on launch day has never purchased a console at launch day and as usual should wait for a price drop.
Kleegamefan said:For the record, I don't have a problem with 2 SKUs....I don't have a problem with the base system being $299(a fair price) or $399 for the other one (its a great deal)
What I have a problem with is:
No HDD in all Xbux Three $ixties, fragmenting the user base
With the quantities they are buying, I doubt they are paying much more than $50 each. The LD25 series is designed to be the cheapest 2.5" hard drive Seagate has ever made, and I have seen 20GB, 2MB cache, 5400rpm OEM Momentus hard drives (the current standard 2.5" Seagate hard drive series) for less than $75.m0dus said:but falls within the $65-70+ price range. $99 is not much of a stretch, considering they want to make a profit on peripherals.
:lol I'm Canadain so i guess it doesn't apply to you folks in the States.border said:I think most people in the past have managed to keep their launch purchases under $600....which is possible even with the X360.
Setting aside the fact that a storage device that was standard on the original Xbox has been removed on the base-level version of the sequel - something that was touted as an advantage by all right-thinking Xbox boosters everywhere - I'd gently remind you that the use of the HD for caching and custom soundtracks has also proven quite popular among the hoi polloi. There's more to it than "going on Live and dowlnloading rich media".Pseudo judo said:Now why's that, enlighten me and relieve me of my ignorance.
element said:when did 64 MB become 'small'? For basic player vs player gaming, you really dont need any space locally. Now for things like DLC and stuff, if that is something your interested in, then your going to have to make a decision to do some memory card managment, or buy a HDD. Not to mention the long speculated 'save to PC', which might be possible.