i should've at least finished a season of monogatari but whatevs
i understand enough of this picture to link it here
yeah i was thinking of this too just now, how difficult it would be to fit it in her kit cos everything is always up for rivenWell, I guess the question is where would you put it in her kit and not make it feel disgusting? Basically all of Riven's kit is on-demand vs Fiora being mostly windows (timered, ultimate). There's not a lot of room in Riven's kit to put that and keep it as being spammable and on-demand.
and i feel that if you replaced her ult execute with it it'd have a pretty negative effect on how she's played
why not call adcs adcs loladcs
granted it encompasses mages as well but...yeah, the mage tag could be nixed.
not really, you condescendingly gave a definition of what a slayer is, a definition that riven would fit almost perfect if you dedicated a second to partake of the tiny thinking exercise i gave you of "what if riven was damage agnostic and why isn't she"she's not damage agnostic because she wasn't designed to be so. She deals flat damage on all of her abilities. She's designed to kill squishies and other divers/juggernauts, not tanks. She has some defining qualities, mainly her mobility that separate her from other divers who have their own unique mechanics. Riven's not designed to fight your front line, she's designed to be very good at killing your back line. Fiora is not. Fiora, Yi and Yasuo are designed to fight whomever they can reach.
I don't what else to say. She's designed to not be a slayer, Fiora is designed to be a slayer. Am I misunderstanding your question? your question was why is it ok for Fiora to have the mechanic in question and not Riven, I answered that.
now all you say is she's not damage agnostic cos she wasn't designed to, which isn't really engaging with my question in any way
maybe you don't find this shit worth your while and that's cool, you don't have to defend anything (i wasn't even "attacking" anything) but no need to be condescending about it and tell me "because they're two different champions?" like i'm an idiot. it's very frustrating and it's not the first time you've acted that way, and it's specially annoying this time that i wasn't even being negative or anything
look at scy's reply for an insightful and interesting reply that totally shut down the idea but put some more thought into why. i like to think out loud and make other people part of my thinking process because i know pretty much everyone is smarter than me, so it's cool if a question i ask gets a thoughtful reply that i can use to sort my thoughts together. you think i'm an idiot and not worth the time to think of what i have to say? just don't reply to me :I
that probably means that in your version of league there's no yasuoYou see, in my version of league, champs like yasuo would use mana as a resource. All champs in my game would use mana as a resource because it provides additional ways to tune them.
A certain ability does too much damage or is too powerful overall? Increase the mana cost or increase the cooldown or nerf the damage. Now you have 3 tuning levers instead of 2.
(now that i think about it that doesn't sound so bad lol)
i think resourceless champions allow designers to break some rules and create unique gameplay that wouldn't work for champions gated by mana
it's not always perfect but mana is far from a perfect system anyways, with it barely existing as a system after mages get one item (it's gotten better after they removed athenes from the game tho
grosssempai, then?
and grosszky prefers onii-chan~
the ~ is very important