I won my lane, I remember that much! Least I think I did.... wait... I remember towers getting smashed cause I teleported bot....
Karma if you want a replacement for Nunu top asshole shenanigans.I see. Carry on. No blood on those hands.
I've basically gone to where I'm only using Fiora or Renekton up top. I need a third reliable champ up there. I could go Jax, but he's banned so often that I'd probably be best off with someone more likely to get through bans. Any suggestions?
Shyvana is always reliable IMO, same as Trundle. Ryze against melee top. Irelia if you are comfortable with her.I see. Carry on. No blood on those hands.
I've basically gone to where I'm only using Fiora or Renekton up top. I need a third reliable champ up there. I could go Jax, but he's banned so often that I'd probably be best off with someone more likely to get through bans. Any suggestions?
Oh ya there was a soraka. Only champs I remembered was me and jax. I was a bit gone.
Shyvana is always reliable IMO, same as Trundle. Ryze against melee top. Irelia if you are comfortable with her.
Wouldn't call Trundle always reliable since he's easily 'counter-picked' by top laners that can harrass well with their ranged attacks. The likes of Lissandra, Karma, Ryze, Quinn etc. are practically untouchable without jungle assistance, so he's not exactly the kind of pick you'd go for blind.Shyvana is always reliable IMO, same as Trundle. Ryze against melee top. Irelia if you are comfortable with her.
Wouldn't call Trundle always reliable since he's easily 'counter-picked' by top laners that can harrass well with their ranged attacks. The likes of Lissandra, Karma, Ryze, Quinn etc. are practically untouchable without jungle assistance, so he's not exactly the kind of pick you'd go for blind.
For clarity, by "picking blind" I just meant "choosing him without knowing who your lane opponent is."Well he did say something about banning so I thought he was talking about ranked atleast :x
quinn skin vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvmyNiRBtfE
pls dont pick on the blind
back to being tsm fan it's that easy
Is that suppose to be a wildling?
I'm not saying W to deflect to CS.. just the W skill gives you a passive attack bonus..the first point especially. Makes csing with her incredibly easy with a dorans blade + runes.
As for pinks, you probably don't have to worry about of that. Most of the bush juking is going to occur before the first back.. and even then they'll probably only use their trinket ward if any on the lane bushes.
Riot, PLEASE fix the issue with AFK/quitters. I just had two quit and ruin that match. Freaking lost 20 LP because two kids probably had to go shovel dog poop or something. I'm so tired of it. They really need to revamp how the game docks you LP in a loss where it's a 3v5. It's downright asinine that they don't compensate for that.
Riot, PLEASE fix the issue with AFK/quitters. I just had two quit and ruin that match. Freaking lost 20 LP because two kids probably had to go shovel dog poop or something. I'm so tired of it. They really need to revamp how the game docks you LP in a loss where it's a 3v5. It's downright asinine that they don't compensate for that.
Yoo 'no nothin' Jarvan teh FourthIs that suppose to be a wildling?
wouldn't that be pretty prone to abuse? Going to lose? go ultra toxic until someone quits.
AD Renek is so fun,
yet frowned upon on
:c
That's because you die instantly. Also, don't get a PD on him man! No, bad Mothman! NO!
I read a post about him awhile back on reddit. It was done by Neryth.
You can see what be likes to build on him at the bottom. It's actually really fun, a lifeguard crocodile going around doing big crits.
edit: yeah you die instantly, that's the big downside. Also, I felt like a WoW tank. I'd go in, trying to dish out damage but I'm going down. Have full fury, W/Q, go back up as if I had a healer behind me lol.
I can. Did the person never buy an item? If it's possible to track that, and differentiate between never buying an item and selling all your items, then you can just trigger when a player never connected at all.i can't think of any way riot could fix those things and not make it abusable
I'm signing up now to play the new support mid and/or ADC and/or top lane bruiser until they're nerfed
Apparently I'm late to the party, cute video. Giant shield! I will continue with my plans to play him mid/jungle/top but I fear the worst.
Oh yeah, I promised to play him in other roles, that's going to be tough to work out. Well maybe those JUNGLE MONSTERS will fear concussive blows.
Or maybe I can be like Kiunch and play him as AP Leona mid. Too bad the skills will scale off of defensive stats as well, like Galio!
Just build iceborne gauntlet on Braum, the post-attack boost synergizes with using a skill, and the ice-themed gauntlet synergizes with his ice-themed spells.
iceborn brauntlet
so your internet dies and you lose like 80 lp?I can. Did the person never buy an item? If it's possible to track that, and differentiate between never buying an item and selling all your items, then you can just trigger when a player never connected at all.
It's not abusable because if someone is bullied into quitting, they still already bought an item.
Not one time, but if it's consistent, I think something is reasonable. Like if someone has 5 games in a week or two where they never join at all, maybe they can be flagged for punishment.so your internet dies and you lose like 80 lp?
really people that get that upset over afkers and ragequitters should stay away from ranked
sure, ban them fools but that's what leaver buster does dudeNot one time, but if it's consistent, I think something is reasonable. Like if someone has 5 games in a week or two where they never join at all, maybe they can be flagged for punishment.
Rex mentioned 4-5 games in a row in diamond with people afk or disconnected. If reports indicate that a player does that consistently, then I think it's grounds for action.
sure, ban them fools but that's what leaver buster does dude
like what people are asking for is for a system that detects whether people is afking in your team and in that case gives you a free loss prevented and that's just not gonna happen. there's just no way to prevent people from abusing that and you can't give people their lp back if after 5 games leaverbuster detects the guy that went afk is actually a troll
scenario 1: guy gets ganked 3 times and then he leaves. how does the system tell he ragequit or his internet went down?
scenario 2: someone never connects, doesn't buy an item or whatever. how does the system know this guy had an inet problem or that he really scouted the enemy team and saw a diamond and figured he'd just afk at base?
like if people got off lp losses if you had a disconnect at minute 0 they could arrange having someone dc if they don't like their comp vs the enemy comp, etc.
this is a really hard thing to do because there's no non-ad hoc way that i know off to tell the difference between someone's isp going down or them plugging the ethernet cable.
people just need to remind themselves that moving up in ranked takes a lot of games, and that one or two games won't set you off so bad. and yea real life rng might fuck you over and give you 4-5 straight games of ragequitters but it's nothing if you're playing hundreds like you should
Not one time, but if it's consistent, I think something is reasonable. Like if someone has 5 games in a week or two where they never join at all, maybe they can be flagged for punishment.
Rex mentioned 4-5 games in a row in diamond with people afk or disconnected. If reports indicate that a player does that consistently, then I think it's grounds for action.
All good points, but maybe the review process is just not honed in enough or something. Lately if you play 2-3 games a night, you're bound to see at least 1 AFK. I can't believe how common it is now.
I can. Did the person never buy an item? If it's possible to track that, and differentiate between never buying an item and selling all your items, then you can just trigger when a player never connected at all.
It's not abusable because if someone is bullied into quitting, they still already bought an item.
And now for Braum:
It took about 10 minutes of waiting in team builder before I got to join a team, but I got kicked shortly after that. I then made my OWN lobby, and it only took 5 minutes or so before I got people crazy enough to roll with Braum.
I am changing my signup since I do not intend to play Braum mid after this. Still, this was the first attempt of Braum mid in a PVP game, and it was a victory, so that's cool. We had Yasuo top (high noon skin on both teams), Braum mid lane, Shaco jungle, and Jinx + LeBlanc bot lane.
The other team started with Yasuo mid, but I got first blood when Shaco ganked (possibly off the passive stun proc), and apparently Yasuo got annoyed since he started switching lanes whenever I would follow him, trying to put Cho against me instead. That seemed like a good strategy since Cho would probably be good against Braum.
My team had great teamwork though, and everyone was nice. Someone (Yasuo?) even said something like "You got it boss" "You know your shit so I'm going to follow you" when I was trying to organize tower pushes, inhibitors, healing, baron, etc. I know it was just a silly team builder game and everyone was probably random levels, but it was really nice of someone to say that.
So I can say yay, Braum mid win, team builder vindicated. I wonder if there are so few people playing team builder now that Riot will consider it a failure though. I wonder what the numbers are.
It's so annoying when people who don't know how support works goes support ://
First he picks darius, starts without wards (which he never buys), and he goes botrk as first item... I wish I was higher elo