DyslexicAlucard
Member
Honestly, it's a personal issue between him and me that he seems to want to make public. From what I can gather (from not being allowed in the new LGBT chat and some messages from friends) he's spread our personal issues to the other venues and seems to want to do so here as well. I obviously don't wish to do so -- not because I'm too ashamed of anything (although I was certainly not perfect,) but because this is not the place.Still completely confused over what happened in the last page. RIP
If any mutual acquaintances want to talk and maybe hear my side of the story, then they can message me. Otherwise, I'd like to keep this space as drama-free as possible.
The pushback (at least on my part) is because many non-binary or questioning people choose and ask people to call them they/them/their so to say it is definitively incorrect and "ugh" seems like it is discounting a popular choice (even if you weren't doing so out of disrespect for someone's ability to express their gender on their own terms).
. . .
They/them/their is a legitimate choice as far as most in the community are concerned, to my knowledge
No it isn't. Descriptivists and Standard American English grammar school books don't determine English grammar.
I wish people who "love" language would actually bother to study linguistics.
I'm dragging this up again because I was busy with a French final, but ya'll may have noticed that I said it was subjective because I was acknowledging (and not shying away from) the debate over it in recent centuries.
And you're getting pushback because you're being pedantic against uses of the language that are long established (style guides can, do, and will argue against such things) and that actually empower some people. I'm not going to insist on being a pedant and dictate to NB people or women that they must use a generic he (this is the corollary to not calling someone by they/them who doesn't wish for that). Use defines language, and you can argue about what ought to be employed, but slavish adherence to syntax and style declarations is to throw your mind into the sea. Adverbs are railed against in style guides too, but that's not to say they're absolutely proscribed.
You can clutch your pearls about what's proper. Me, I'll stick to what's effective and what works.
I'm okay with talking about it. But I just want it to be clear that we don't need to try to characterize each other with things like "I wish people who 'love' language would actually bother to study linguistics" and "You can clutch your pearls about what's proper." It's just not necessary.
Anyway, obviously at some point language is a fluid thing. It grows and evolves over time, and some uses morph into others. I'm okay with this. But I do believe there is a limit. At its core, language is a distinct pattern of symbols arranged in a certain way to convey thoughts to another person. It has to adhere to certain rules, otherwise the whole system collapses in on itself. So some strict use of syntax and grammar are necessary.
The reason I picked "they/them" was that Emouse originally stated:
they/them just makes me feel like I'm not even a person ugh
I was sympathizing with this. However, in doing so I inadvertently seem to have stepped on some toes, so let me be clear: I was not aware that questioning or other queer people use "they" as a chosen pronoun. As I previously stated, people should be called by whatever pronoun they wish, and I in no way meant to demean anyone by calling their pronoun of choice "grammatically incorrect." That was my bad.
I guess ideally I'd be in favour of creating a new genderless pronoun akin to what the Japanese practice. But it's obviously not up to me to dictate to a group of people what they should and should not do re: how they wish to be represented.