DidntKnowJack
Member
I find the "he's just a minor" argument a bit weak. Yes he's only 17, but that's old enough to know right from wrong, surely.
I find the "he's just a minor" argument a bit weak. Yes he's only 17, but that's old enough to know right from wrong, surely.
Had he swatted someone I'd want the penalty to be harsher. This is ok I guess but hopefully they start adding some sort of fine to these things as well.
Had he swatted someone I'd want the penalty to be harsher. This is ok I guess but hopefully they start adding some sort of fine to these things as well.
http://www.theatlantic.com/internat...why-scandinavian-prisons-are-superior/279949/
Going by this, 20-30 percent recidivism versus the US' 40-70 percent.
No, you don't understand. within 1 year he would have developed his adult brain that will be able to distinguish what is right and wrong. 17 year olds are just kids. Trust me, i'm an expert.
Nice strawman. Now you just need a Tin Man and a Lion for the matching set.
Show me where any of what you said was reflected in what I said.
I'm saying that the amount of harm caused to the victims should very much be considered in sentencing criminals or your system of justice can hardly be considered equitable or fair.
That's what 'just' means, y'know?
Pretty sure he tweeted out pictures of him playing a PS3 from a jail cell lol.
more than 50,000 instances of cybercrime.
two-year suspended sentence
A slap on the wrist for cybercrime isn't a deterrent for further criminal behavior, it's a joke.
Weak sentence from a weak justice system.
People saying the punishment is too weak just goes to show that the majority of people in society see justice as a tool for revenge, not as a tool for reforming criminals to make them better members of society.
In Europe we don't send people to die in prison for internet crimes.
Can someone clarify this? Sounds like something you could put on resume to get a job with big paycheck here ie."assisted fbi to track down crime" or something.was ordered to fight against cybercrime,
In Europe we don't send people to die in prison for internet crimes.
People saying the punishment is too weak just goes to show that the majority of people in society see justice as a tool for revenge, not as a tool for reforming criminals to make them better members of society.
He kept us from playing our toys on Christmas morning!Some of y'all sure do want the guy's life irreparabley destroyed while he's in his teens.
He kept us from playing our toys on Christmas morning!
I don't know. Like I see where people are coming from with justice being about rehabilitation and not revenge. I agree. But this guy is not even serving any jail time.
The fact that people are defending this and saying he got enough punishment, it just seems insane. It's easy to trivialize that he "ruined people Xmas cuz he took down stupid video games"....but really, these guys were having a major impact on economies by bringing things to a halt. Even if it's just entertainment services, they are disrupting worldwide services which impacts a market.
It seems insane that it's okay to do that, show no remorse, and then get less than a slap on the wrist. Seems crazy.
Yeah. That's fucked up. You also have to weigh that against the fact that he is a kid.He swatted someone at least once... Did you read the article? How would you feel if cops busted in your door and pointed guns at you and screamed in your face? Would you be cool with the guy who did it getting no real punishment? Yes?
He's a minor.
Showing remorse is useless. What matters is real rehabilitation and lowering recidivism and it seems Finland knows what its doing by the stats.
People saying the punishment is too weak just goes to show that the majority of people in society see justice as a tool for revenge, not as a tool for reforming criminals to make them better members of society.
Deterrence blatantly doesn't work, risk takers rarely if ever take risks thinking about the consequences, and the difference between 10 years and 40 years jail is irrelevant to them at the time they commit the crime. It's probably the worst justification for stricter sentences out there. The entire legal profession is heavily in favour of lighter sentences from top to bottom because they see how much good locking someone up is doing, jack all.
should've been a year in prison at least. weak ass system over there
Which do you prefer, punishment or rehabilitation?
1 year prison. 1 year rehabilitation when he comes out
1 year prison. 1 year rehabilitation when he comes out
Punishment then? I don't think you understand what they're trying to achieve. Their way works. Yours does not. Wanting him to be in prison does nothing but temporarily sate your own desire to see him hurt in some fashion.
video games are serious business lol.
In the end, all he did was inconvenience some gamers. Lets not go nuts. Having said that, the punishment should have been something that would actually deter him from becoming a recidivist.
A fine that would take him years and years to pay would hurt him more. Especially at 17. 30K fine would have stung.
First offense.
Not every country has a vengeance based justice system like the US, which empowers gang activity and disenfranchises citizens after getting out.
oh, so you're an expert now? please enlighten me.
People who make it their goal in life to make the lives of others more difficult deserve to be locked away. We're in this together. Don't be a twat.
Just wish the sentence were harsher.
should have killed the kid and displayed his corpse for all to see.