ThisWreckage
Banned
Nomad Blue said:Not going to happen.
That would be immensely moronic and it would be an open invitation for more shit like this to happen in the future.
Nomad Blue said:Not going to happen.
SmokyDave said:Yeah, I'll take an aussie roof over my head please. I'll travel in your bags.
Is it 5 dead now? Croydon shooting, 60 year old, 3 in hit 'n' run?
SmokyDave said:Yeah, I'll take an aussie roof over my head please. I'll travel in your bags.
Is it 5 dead now? Croydon shooting, 60 year old, 3 in hit 'n' run?
60 year old was yesterday. Not the guy on the cover of the papers (I think). On phone ATM so can't drag up link.Lireu77 said:Who was that 60 year old ? I only know about the Croydon one and the 3 in Birmingham.
Man where are people getting this info? When do he die? Last time I heard he was in hospitalSmokyDave said:60 year old was yesterday. Not the guy on the cover of the papers (I think). On phone ATM so can't drag up link.
A 60 year old really isn't deserving of the title "old man"jufonuk said:the old man died, holy fucking shit, these little cunts need to get a beating....
sorry but the guy was only stopping wheelie bins from goign on fire and they beat him, little shits!!
rogue_pigeon said:A 60 year old really isn't deserving of the title "old man"
Er.. why not? Retirement age is 60-65rogue_pigeon said:A 60 year old really isn't deserving of the title "old man"
Stop trying to de humanise them. They are scum, but they are not sub human. They are just another aspect of the joys of being an animal.Nomad Blue said:The twats who are looting and rioting, ripping people out of cars, with kids in the back, and setting fire to them(the cars)? No. Lets stop making excuses for these sub-human scum.
Salazar said:I fail to see how this is not a rephrasing of the conjecture that long-term (and even inter-generational) dependency on welfare can be quite corrosive to social responsibility.
Were you agreeing with me ?
dc89 said:No video of the plain clothes police officers arresting that guy.
GMP are tough bastards.
Nah, they don't. Peppering people with welfare and expecting nothing in return is the reason these kids exist in the first place.jorma said:No, i was vehemently disagreeing, because those wellfare checks makes things better and not worse. I'd agree (if i for one second thought this was what you were suggesting) that more efforts should be made than just handing out those checks every month, but removing them is not the solution.
Dead Man said:Stop trying to de humanise them. They are scum, but they are not sub human. They are just another aspect of the joys of being an animal.
kitch9 said:The plain clothes tactic was very effective it appears....... I'm impressed as nobody on the news even mentioned it.
The police must be smarter than we thought!
jorma said:No, i was vehemently disagreeing, because those wellfare checks makes things better and not worse. I'd agree (if i for one second thought this was what you were suggesting) that more efforts should be made than just handing out those checks every month, but removing them is not the solution.
SmokyDave said:Nah, they don't. Peppering people with welfare and expecting nothing in return is the reason these kids exist in the first place.
Salazar said:It's not a solution I mentioned nor that I would soberly propose.
ThisWreckage said:That would be immensely moronic and it would be an open invitation for more shit like this to happen in the future.
SmokyDave said:Nah, they don't. Peppering people with welfare and expecting nothing in return is the reason these kids exist in the first place.
I wouldn't remove the benefits, I'd selectively remove some of the claimants.jorma said:How would removing them help? Do you have any examples where removing wealth redistribution has helped problem communities grow into model communities? Because i have quite the opposite experiences from my country as we've gone more rightwing.
jorma said:But if you think they are the problem, what do you suggest? I'm obviously missing something here :X
Antagon said:The Ipod (I think) looks out of place as well.
Salazar said:I don't think welfare per se is bad. I think it will always have mixed virtues.
I do think welfare dependency is a general social ill: "the problem", as you put it. I don't have any terrific solutions. I think, to adapt Dave's phrasing, "expecting something in return" is the posture governments should tend towards. Whether that be in the form of work for the dole programs, work-search commitments, behavioural pledges.
That's not fiendishly right-wing of me. I fucking loathed the work for the dole program I participated in when I was out of work (and clinically depressed, for a time) after finishing uni. In part because it was administered with a malign ineptitude. But if it hadn't been there, I would have slid down the same pathetic track some of these rioting bastards have.
You know who's disenfranchised?IamMikeside said:I don't really want to dive back into this argument today (becuase frankly I've had enough of arguing with my own family about it), but this is exactly right. If we try to distance ourselves from these people and deny that they are as much a product of our society as we are, then we risk being unable to help future generations to feel more enfranchised & connected with society and to help people become productive adults in the future.
Nomad Blue said:I thought there were already work-search commitments? I know there used to be, and every week or two you had to say what jobs you applied for. Was very, very easy to get around though.
Manos: The Hans of Fate said:Could we have a thread on politics and crime and for once not drag the Holocaust into it.
SmokyDave said:You know who's disenfranchised?
Me.
I don't have a religion-based community to belong to. I'm not in a gang. I can't stand behind my community 'leaders', because there aren't any. I can't band together with others of my ethnicity because the only ones doing that are skinheads or rioters. I know that NONE of the political parties will echo MY voice, will fight for MY demands or are aligned with MY values.
Maybe it's time I just tore shit up, eh?
Visualante said:Glad to see hacking threats aimed squarely at RIM/BlackBerry.
I think it's a huge invasion of privacy and completely illegal. From what I understand they are able to request individual user data on a case by case basis. And what we're talking about here is swathes of chat logs from localised areas irrespective of whether someone is involved or not.
I know, but if we're going to start enfranchising people, start with those of us that actually contribute something.Kelthink said:Whatever you just said doesn't mean they're not disenfranchised, you know.
Salazar said:I don't think welfare per se is bad. I think it will always have mixed virtues.
SmokyDave said:I know, but if we're going to start enfranchising people, start with those of us that actually contribute something.
Gaaraz said:
Which area? Someone was stabbed in mine (Notts). Said not to be connected but happened in same area at same time as trouble.ashley678 said:someone was raped in my area last night, not been confirmed if it was all linked to the riots yet
Bottom line for me is, there are a lot of disenfranchised people with nothing to look forward to that we need to take care of. These scum are not those people.Kelthink said:You've got something to look forward to though. That rioting shower haven't. They're twats, but what have they got to lose? Obviously a good lot of them have crossed 'the line' (wherever that is, I'm definitely not happy with some of the more extreme instances) but they don't know where that line is. They're a forgotten bunch of people.
They get great benefits in Scandinavian countries but they haven't gone apeshit, probably because their societies are closer to actual societies rather than 'a bunch of people who live in the same area'.
ThisWreckage said:The truth of the matter is that a majority of these people will not get caught.