LaunchpadMcQ
Banned
oh shit
Guys guys. It just hit me. The mafia have an information gathering role too. That's why I exist.
Guys guys. It just hit me. The mafia have an information gathering role too. That's why I exist.
full bore you're the scum?
did you read my post?
It doesn't appear so. You did quote it though, the section where I say there's a reasonable chance you're town.
Why are you painting it so black and white?
I don't even have my vote on you anymore.
Oops I missed that lol
That wasn't why I believed it, you're mixing up my two statements
Or maybe I'm mixing up yours
oh shit
Guys guys. It just hit me. The mafia have an information gathering role too. That's why I exist.
Yesterday, cabot. You went full bore yesterday. You've since backed off but still. You really jumped on me there.
to be honest what is fun about a confused grandma?
if anything it's grim.
I forgot to say something back to this, on the flip side, what's fun about incontinence guy (also, guy, not kid)? I'm ok listening to Tim and trying not to glean anything from role names.
I was just answering where the Becky flavor came from. I think that was your question?
I'll bite, what does this mean? I think it's fairly obvious that you exist to fuck with the watcher and the tracker, if roy is telling the truth.
That was a joke observation than an actual point, I'm afraid.
sorry, I misunderstood.
Yes, but why else would anyone think it's a good idea to stick something so anti-town as a town role? Because it has a double-edged nature. And besides Burbeting, who has admitted to having a role that can see activity?
Now you might be thinking, well what about the Miller? Yet, there was a specific set of circumstances where the Miller would not have hurt us - if Fireblend had managed to swap his alignment and Karkador had investigated him, Cabot would have turned up town. It's a ridiculously specific set of circumstances, but it could work to thwart it's entire purpose.
Similarly, you expect there to be multiple layers to a single role, which is why I'm now believing that there is more to my role than screwing with one single player. Also, the same could be said your the Rich Kid role.
I think Roy is telling the truth about his role ability and title, yet lying about his alignment.
After all, Drone Kid? Sounds like an elitist prick who doesn't even like video games.
Actually, the main reason that an information-gathering mafia role would exist is to improve their lies.
Finally, we have cabbeh and Sorian flying under the radar. No one has calling them out right now.
I'm just pointing out it's odd is all...
You have been coasting by on that miller claim since d1, cabot.
1) Cabot is just voting for me said he was coasting earlier today. Notice I never threw a vote his way, I just pointed out he hasn't really had to defend himself since D1.
Yes, it is very reasonable I am town. Once you realize the evidence for me is non-existent it's easy to see.
So now we've got two people thinking I'm scum because I'm pointing the finger at that. Do you remember when I pointed at them? It was well before either of them voted me. So it wasn't in some "redirection" play, which some people claim I'm doing. I wasn't redirecting votes from me because I didn't have any yet (except Sorian's prod vote, IIRC).
2) Yeah, I got a little more offensive today because we need this. I called out roy and cabot, and they retaliated by voting for me. Now the rest of you are all "ok with lynching me" because you've had your suspicions previously. But still lack any real evidence I'm scum. Because I'm not.
So let's recap:
1. I claim ordinary before the day ends yesterday
2. You guys lynch Blarg (I abstain from voting). I might add roy was part of this vote.
3. We get two PR roleclaims within minutes of eachother (Darryl and roy)
4. Sorian votes for me without much reasoning
4. I say roy still seems suspicious, which is in disagreement with the general consensus of Darryl being more suspicious. I also say Sorian and cabot has been flying under the radar.
6. Cabot votes me angrily
7. Roy says he's OK coming after me and then votes me.
8. LP says he's cool voting me or Darryl
9. Launch calls me and Darryl scum but can't make up his mind.
8. Here we are.
My point being, just because someone has claimed a PR doesn't make them town. You guys have to see this weirdness in all these votes for me. I'm the easiest fucking target in the game right now and it's easy for mafia to hide in these votes.
3) Cabot is retaliating against me for saying he was coasting. I didn't even throw a vote his way and he jumped on the train because he saw where it was going.
4) Someone is hiding there, I swear to god. Look at cabot and roy's posts. Just look at them.
Or Cabot's...again, for re-iteration. Jesus christ do I have to highlight this shit for you guys.
Look again, this is exactly what I said about Cabot before he jumped on me. It was one fucking line.
He jumps...
And then I calmly explain it was just an observation, and now he's full bore I'm the scum. OK then.
Yesterday, cabot. You went full bore yesterday. You've since backed off but still. You really jumped on me there.
The possibility of scum with tracking abilities is interesting. I was pretty set on the fact that we had one more town PR, but that may have been wishful thinking since we lost so many already. So roy claiming tracker makes sense, and neither Time nor Darryl counter-claimed. The lack of useful information could be explained by the fact he had no info so he didn't want to claim yet (as opposed to Burb delivering us his claim and scum).
Considering how strong Fireblend was, maybe roy is the only other scum?
Time seems to be playing like a poor man's Launchpad.
Special Roles
cabbeh [m] - Miller (unconfirmed)
batsnacks [m] - Jailor
Karkador [m] - Investigator
Burbeting [m] - Watcher
LaunchpadMcQ [m] - Urinary Tract Infection Guy(unconfirmed)Incontinence Guy
Lone_Prodigy [m] - hey Becky, you so fine
roytheone [m] - Tracker (unconfirmed)
Darryl - One-shot bulletproof (unconfirmed)
Ordinary
SalvaPot [m] - Ordinary Kid
Ourobolus [m] - Ordinary Kid
Blargonaut [m] - Ordinary Kid
squidyj [m] - Ordinary Kid
Timeaisis [m] - Ordinary Kid (unconfirmed)
Neutral
Sorian [m] - Rich Kid with eccentric tastes (unconfirmed)
Mafia
Fireblend [m] - Recently Divorced Dad
Edited this based on what everyone has claimed. 5 Ordinaries make sense. Town seems quite strong, with a watcher, jailer, cop, one-shot vig, and alleged tracker and one-shot bulletproof. Is that balanced out by the lack of a doctor?
Maybe Tim wanted a scenario where the watcher, tracker, Sorian, Launch, and Fireblend all acted on a single target at night, similar to what happened to Ouro on N1. Imagine the shenanigans if Burb reports seeing 4 people visit his target?
Can't really say town lacked a doctor though, they just got a jailor instead. The scenario you present at the end is certainly possible but I doubt anything was designed around assuming that would happen, it would be very coincidental without a lightning rod in play. A lot of arguments seem to come back to roy being a scum tracker.
Kill me then, you idiots.
Also, saying that our roles weren't designed with that express purpose in mind supports my reasoning that Sorian and I are also here to throw off another role.
I don't think there's much to his voting. Darryl is good at acting like town. He patented the whole frustrated villager act in the AC game.
Sorian - Sorian licked me so his claim checks out mostly to me. I also believe he is in fact a neutral as opposed to a scum. I think my role is anti town enough that having a Mafia member that can cause confusion with the licks AND kill seems OP. I also believe it would be very fucking odd if he were Mafia and both he and Fireblend visited Ouro on N1.
Kill me then, you idiots.
Has Sorian demonstrated any use of being personally able to control his licks? He says that he is forced to lick someone? How do we know it isn't above him, which would make the most sense in this scenario? If we look at Launch's claimed role with any validity, he doesn't have control over who he visits either.
Launch also doesn't know who he visits, I obviously do know who I visited and, except for today, I've always posted right at day opening with the name of the person I visited. I mean this is dumb logic though, if you are town, you should be worried about missing scum today not hunting down a neutral, if you need to know that I have agency over my lick for some reason then, easy enough, I give a name at the end of the day and they wake up with a cowlick tomorrow. I'm not worried about a roleblocker anymore so I don't think anything can stop this tongue.
Where did this come from? No one even talked about you in depth on this page.
to be honest what is fun about a confused grandma?
if anything it's grim.
The strong town could be counterbalanced by a mafia member who is forced to draw attention to himself. I'm pointing out to Cabot that it isn't proof you aren't mafia just because you guys hit the same target, since you appear to have demonstrated no real control over the ability. No one else has claimed neutral so I'm stepping off. Don't think you're exempt from scrutiny because you can lick people. That's way too ridiculous for me to go along with.
Is anyone else super turned on by thisIf the bolded is all you've got then I'll have to disappoint you tomorrow. I'll be licking Time or Launch. I give two on the off chance one of them is voted off after I give this statement. If someone other than those two is voted off then my choice is Launch for sure. Boom, sense of agency for my actions.
The strong town could be counterbalanced by a mafia member who is forced to draw attention to himself. I'm pointing out to Cabot that it isn't proof you aren't mafia just because you guys hit the same target, since you appear to have demonstrated no real control over the ability. No one else has claimed neutral so I'm stepping off. Don't think you're exempt from scrutiny because you can lick people. That's way too ridiculous for me to go along with.
If the bolded is all you've got then I'll have to disappoint you tomorrow. I'll be licking Time or Launch. I give two on the off chance one of them is voted off after I give this statement. If someone other than those two is voted off then my choice is Launch for sure. Boom, sense of agency for my actions.
Is anyone else super turned on by this
Also, whoa whoa wait. The strong town would be counterbalanced by a mafia member fumbling around in the dark each night? Is that how we balance gameplay? We see that one side is strong so we weaken the other side even more?
Strong mafia I mean. You know the guy with 3 PRs in one.
If the bolded is all you've got then I'll have to disappoint you tomorrow. I'll be licking Time or Launch. I give two on the off chance one of them is voted off after I give this statement. If someone other than those two is voted off then my choice is Launch for sure. Boom, sense of agency for my actions.
You fumbled with your words here too. You simultaneously claimed you will be licking Launch or Time, and Launch for sure.
If the bolded is all you've got then I'll have to disappoint you tomorrow. I'll be licking Time or Launch. I give two on the off chance one of them is voted off after I give this statement. If someone other than those two is voted off then my choice is Launch for sure. Boom, sense of agency for my actions.
Right. But you said if anyoneother than those 2 gets lynched, not if one of them.
In the chance we evict me tonight, you are claiming to lick
1. Launch "for sure"
2. Time or Launch
The only way what you're saying makes sense is if you knew the night target too, which you couldn't unless you were mafia.
Once in the game you may switch any two players by sending me the night action MISTAKEN IDENTITY: <player name> and <player name>. Any night actions performed on one player will be performed on the other.
Once in the game you may knock over another player by sending me the night action SHOVE: <player name> That player will be unable to perform any actions that night.
I don't understand this plan. Can someone clarify?
I don't know anymore. The way you worded how our were going to choose your target was way too confusing. You use too many words.
These are two one-shot abilities where, if they were town-sided, most people would have to guess or randomly choose a target. Instead of doing that, the mafia told Fireblend to carry out the kill. Thats because they were waiting until they had more information in order to use either of these two abilities. Of course, they could get this information from just hearing the conversations from the day phase, but then why not save up Fireblends ability and put him at risk?
That would be because the mafia have an ability that lets them detect who uses abilities, and in order to best utilize Fireblends (and their potential other members abilities), they would benefit greatly from having more information before carrying out these actions. It was absolutely certain that they would have more information later on, so they allowed Fireblend to use up his night action.
Maybe we have been looking at this wrong: instead of trying to draw links between two scum players, maybe there's only one on their own.
I'm operating under the assumption of one, find the most obvious and see if the game ends, if not then no harm done, now to find the next one.