Can we have just one night with a consistent amount of kills? D: There's no rhyme or reason to this, if you have the ability to kill and the game is still relatively populous why dont you?
I think we need to start taking a long hard look at the people who voted for Kalor and work out whether they were hopping on a bandwagon or if they were making up terrible reasons, because we need to start somewhere and I guess this is it.
I think you should add erguntz to that list.
For my own reference as much as anything, but in case others need a reminder of who's left and their voting activity
AbsolutBro - (Didn't vote, Didn't vote, Didn't vote, Didn't vote)
I actually did vote for Amir0x last time, but Crab didn't see it.
Kalor was an ordinary tourist, and while that doesn't guarantee that Amir0x is mafia I stand by my vote.
No worries. Apparently I glossed over Crab's comment about really late votes myself.Yeah, I didn't put in any votes that missed the deadline, and just went with Crab's summary posts. Sorry if it's misleading anywhere.
I know it's the weekend, and one where a holiday that takes us away from computers occurs, so a lot of normal posters have been busy.
However, it's really weird that some our heavys eight posters who voted for kalor haven't posted yet...
I'm tempted to drop a vote for amir0x right away. He wasn't the person who started the whole kalor thing (that was QuantumBro two "days" ago) but I feel his actions "on the whole" have been the most suspicious.
Another good one would be timeasis, he seems really town, but his actions lately have been weird.
Also everyone who voted "no lynch", why did you do that? By voting no lunch you doomed kalor as he had a plurality of votes?
I voted for Amir0x yesterday, actually. Just thought I'd point that out.For my own reference as much as anything, but in case others need a reminder of who's left and their voting activity
AbsolutBro - (Didn't vote, Didn't vote, Didn't vote, Didn't vote)
Amir0x - (No Lynch, Didn't vote, Kalor, Kalor)
El Topo - (No Lynch, egruntz, johnnyquicknives, Didn't vote)
Karkador - (No Lynch, egruntz, johnnyquicknives, Didn't vote)
kingkitty - (No Lynch, Didn't vote, Kalor, Kalor)
Lord of Castamere - (No Lynch, egruntz, johnnyquicknives, No Lynch)
Mattyg - (Didn't vote, Didn't vote, johnnyquicknives, Didn't vote)
nin1000 - (No Lynch, Didn't vote, Didn't vote, Didn't vote)
Palmer_v1 - (No Lynch, Didn't vote, irfanaator, Amir0x)
pants - (No Lynch, egruntz, Amir0x, No Lynch)
QuantumBro - (No Lynch, Didn't vote, Kalor, No Lynch)
Rembrandt - (Didn't vote, egruntz, Didn't vote, Kalor)
RobotNinjaHornets - (No Lynch, Didn't vote, Didn't vote, Kalor)
StayDead - (Didn't vote [replaced Xpike], egruntz, Amir0x, Didn't vote)
Timeasis - (Didn't vote, egruntz, irfanaator, Kalor)
tomakasatnav - (Didn't vote, Didn't vote, irfanaator, Didn't vote)
traube - (No Lynch, No Lynch, Kalor, Kalor)
ultron_87 - (Didn't vote, No Lynch, Karkador, Amir0x)
Zippedpinhead - (No Lynch, egruntz, Didn't vote, Amir0x)
Hopefully there aren't any mistakes, taken from Crab's vote posts.
Since he's not dead, I can only assume doctor, killing role and cop/role block.Night 2: I targeted Timeaisis. He was targeted by three other people.
Since he's not dead, I can only assume doctor, killing role and cop/role block.
Also everyone who voted "no lynch", why did you do that? By voting no lunch you doomed kalor as he had a plurality of votes?
Night 2: I targeted Timeaisis. He was targeted by three other people.
So a lot of people looked at Time this night. He was pretty talky, so that makes sense. This was the night that Duress died. My current theory is that one of these people was a Mafia trying to kill Time, another was a town doctor preventing that kill, and a third was something else. That would explain why only one person died that night. So, I think Timeaisis is town.
I can vouch for some of ultron's report, and I will confirm that I was involved with Night 2.
I think he's telling the truth, so I feel that this is more dependable info than the switcher thing. Let's be really careful how we talk about this, please.
Night 2: I targeted Timeaisis. He was targeted by three other people.
So a lot of people looked at Time this night. He was pretty talky, so that makes sense. This was the night that Duress died. My current theory is that one of these people was a Mafia trying to kill Time, another was a town doctor preventing that kill, and a third was something else. That would explain why only one person died that night. So, I think Timeaisis is town.
I can vouch for some of ultron's report, and I will confirm that I was involved with Night 2.
I think he's telling the truth, so I feel that this is more dependable info than the switcher thing. Let's be really careful how we talk about this, please.
Thanks for posting all the information you have! I wouldn't happen to be one of the names on that list, would I?
As I said when I voted, I didn't feel like there was enough evidence at the time for me to believe the Amir0x was a mafia member.
Kalor: 7 / 11 [kingkitty, Amir0x, Timeaisis, Rembrandt, traube, irfaanator, RobotNinjaHornets]
These are the names we need to consider.
I'm particularly suspicious of timeasis now. I just don't trust any of his reasoning for voting kalor. Felt like he threw a lot of convoluted arguments at the role swap thing just to get people to vote for him when others made far more sense. He and amir0x top my list for the moment
This is silly logic.Also everyone who voted "no lynch", why did you do that? By voting no lunch you doomed kalor as he had a plurality of votes?
This is silly logic.
Speaking specifically for myself. I was never going to 'save' Kalor because I felt he was more suspicious than Amir0x yet i wanted a no lynch since i dont think either of them are guilty. I voted no lynch to reflect this.
To say someone should vote Amir0x to force a 'no lynch' like I said when he did it is pissing off 13 active voters for the sake of your own vanity. If someone had voted that way I would immediately vote for them when the day phase opened, even if I knew they were 100% innocent, because that's a big fuck you to everyone that put themselves out there to vote and supply their arguments. No one is bigger than the town, if you cant state your case convincingly and rely on such trickery you're impeding the process.
Well, the thing that was most concerning to me about that tie-making situation was that Mafia could safely vote for their own team with little to no risk
Well, the thing that was most concerning to me about that tie-making situation was that Mafia could safely vote for their own team with little to no risk
The mafia are never going to vote as a block so at least they cant overpower us, this is our advantage. We have to believe by discussing it as openly and transparently as possible, the fact that they cant really block vote will ensure they cant really tamper too much. We just need to stick to it and not waver. What we are lacking so far is communication, we all post too little (I dont want this thread to be filled up by nonsense posts but I do feel we arent all always sharing our thoughts enough) ultron87 has done the right thing here by laying it all out when he suspected that he was in a bind, I'm a bit dissapointed that it's resulted in 10 posts in the last 12 hours.I completely agree, except not everyone is voting. In fact none of our lynches have been a complete consensus and have all been "plurality votes". By fracturing the town the mafia have been able to steer our votes towards other townies (in fact I would bet half of the kalor votes are mafia). If the goal was to not kill anyone yesterday that was the only play.
Vanity has nothing to do with it. Stopping the mafia from running our lynches should be the goal.
I sincerely believe they have been voting for each other in low risk votes so as to have proof they arent mafia when one of them falls. I mean what better out can you have that showing you voted for a mafioso when they go?Well, the thing that was most concerning to me about that tie-making situation was that Mafia could safely vote for their own team with little to no risk
The mafia are never going to vote as a block so at least they cant overpower us, this is our advantage
It's actually a valid tactic if they can
Also I disagree. I think they will double down and sacrifice one of their own if it will take suspicion away from them for a few rounds. I can see a play where they even go into a full on thread spat with each other to strongly imply they arent together.and they also have to if it involves one of them.
I dont, no one does. All we have are reasonable assumptions and data ultron gave us.How do you know this?
I can vouch for some of ultron's report, and I will confirm that I was involved with Night 2.
I think he's telling the truth, so I feel that this is more dependable info than the switcher thing. Let's be really careful how we talk about this, please.
Thanks for posting all the information you have! I wouldn't happen to be one of the names on that list, would I?
I really hope ultron87 says that either you or me were not involved with Timeaisis on night 2. Otherwise, it's going to be one hell of a clusterfuck figuring out what happened that night. I'm going to have to ask Crab some clarification questions in the meantime.
Yes, you were both on my report for Night 2, along with one other.
I didn't really intend to put anyone on blast and cause them to reveal that they have a role (which is why I didn't name names), but here we are. I feel like if you guys are going to claim you have a role you might as well go all the way at this point instead of holding back any potential info.
2) We can't be led astray again with shaky information that is at the mercy of one person's discretion, like the last day. I am vouching for his info to confirm that we can work with this.