Ok i want to try this deck idea. Standard deck. Revolves around lands and using them.
4 Skarrg Guildmage(For animated lands)
4 rancors
4 farseeks
4 Rangers path
3 borborygmos enraged
4 blasphemous acts
3 Boros Reckoners(as i love the dude)
Throw in a few frenzied tillings, ground assaults. Prob is if my guildmages die.. im screwed. Maybe some r/g or r or g discard cards to do extra damage. Any ideas to help me out? Additional colours shouldnt be a prob as i can use mainly any land, though G/R is the main focus and for animate. Maybe a couple gruul charms to make them unblockable.
Iirc, Gruul Charm just targets one creature. Might as well replace it with Mizzit Mortar instead and kill that creature off. Doesn't Blasphemous Acts also targets your own creatures? Sounds like a bad idea to include them. Might as well run Kessig Wolfrun in a R/G deck.
Hope you guys weren't hoping for Reckoner to go down in price as now even the control decks are playing him.
Sam Black taking advantage of those awesome new trigger rules...lol.
What'd he do?
He attacked with Boros Reckoner with an Exalted trigger. He didn't say it was 4/4 until Martin Juza blocked with a Restoration Angel and took 3 to the face.
So, if I understand the new trigger rules correctly, you don't have to announce your triggers until it would affect the board state?
Id use the gruul charm mainly for creatures without flying cant block this turn. Blasphemous act does, but since my lands arent creatures they wont get affected(Other than the guildmage or bory). Reckoner i dont care as the opponent takes 13 to the face and it usually will 2 for 1 anything on the board. Bory is mainly there for shenanigans where Aetherize or something that makes me pick up all my attacking creatures(Lands) that way with bory i can just discard them and damage to the face.
That got me thinking, if you do Blasphemous Act and Boros Charm your Reckoner to give it indescruction, can you still assign the 13 pt of dmg it received?
(If anyone in here is looking for a Vita, I am giving my MtG family $20 off of of my Vita package http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=47713922&postcount=2677 )
So... My LGC owner is being an ass again and wooing me with a Morningtide fatpack...
How I hate him yet love him all the same.
Wow, harvest pyre and reckoner, that's just silly.
What are you looking for, trade wise?
(If anyone in here is looking for a Vita, I am giving my MtG family $20 off of of my Vita package http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=47713922&postcount=2677 )
So... My LGC owner is being an ass again and wooing me with a Morningtide fatpack...
How I hate him yet love him all the same.
So the meta seems to be WR Reckoner with either U or B and Esper control with maybe some Jund thrown in. Is Reckoner good enough in these decks to make Naya bad?
I imagine that Reckoner would just find a way into the Naya builds instead.
I imagine that Reckoner would just find a way into the Naya builds instead.
WotC play by play sucks.
I believe I said the same thing the last time that I watched one of these.
Say what you will about SGC but at least their play by play is USUALLY more entertaining (and knowledgeable)
SCG is better but it's still bad, they tend to be obnoxious and think they know what they are talking about when they really don't. I mute all of them except Marshall he isn't too bad.
WotC play by play sucks.
I believe I said the same thing the last time that I watched one of these.
Say what you will about SGC but at least their play by play is USUALLY more entertaining (and knowledgeable)
Hearing what the players are talking about after the game would be 1000 times more interesting than what the commentators have to say.
I missed the end, did DeTora win?
There's a lot of legitimate frustration about the way she got that invite that sadly is running into the illegitimate misogyny in the world, resulting in a toxic mix.Neat, the stream was kind of disgusting to read but then again it's a typical competitive game stream whenever a female shows up.
Neat, the stream was kind of disgusting to read but then again it's a typical competitive game stream whenever a female shows up.
There's a lot of legitimate frustration about the way she got that invite that sadly is running into the illegitimate misogyny in the world, resulting in a toxic mix.
There's a lot of legitimate frustration about the way she got that invite that sadly is running into the illegitimate misogyny in the world, resulting in a toxic mix.
Misogyny on one end, white knights on the other, a minority of reasonable people being drowned out by the shit.What happened? I've never heard of her but nice to see a girl at the PT. I was thinking it was a shame there weren't any a month or two ago.
Can you elaborate? Or point me to a blog post/article?
Semi-related: Does anyone know how to view the event coverage as a single page instead of multiple pages? I remember this was the norm for a few other PT/GPs.
Misogyny on one end, white knights on the other, a minority of reasonable people being drowned out by the shit.
She got the invite for "community involvement", apparently due to working with the judge program in Puerto Rico in lieu of playing competitively.
Not that I'm aware. Only other similar invites have been the "Celeb" poker player invites - Williams/Froelich - but they were due to them winning WSOP bracelets after having had previous GP/PT finals appearances, and were obvious attention grabs. People didn't like those either, but the fact that it was a transparent marketing ploy lessened the sting.Ah, have they ever done that for other players?
Yeah, well, she's making the haters suck her proverbial dick, so I'm enjoying the hate personally. Nothing like a chick riding perfect on some fools to inflame the nerd rage of a thousand scorned advances.
Hope she wins out, looks into the camera and just goes "Y'all my bitches now"