[QUOTE="God's Beard!";114466282]I don't know what else to say.
"Brava Naya is more fragile because you're set up to get 2- or 3- for one'd every game and you play fewer threats making the deck less consistently aggressive along the course of the game"
"I disagree"
...what do you want me to say to that?
If I play against a red deck with a hand full of haste creatures or a guy with two ash zealots and a playset of titan's strength, which deck do I beat more often?
Probably the one that loses to a D-sphere and has a bunch of shit cards in his hand. That's what happens with Brave Naya. Sure, maybe you win on turn 4 if I decide to never interact with you, but I kill your Fabled Hero, exile your voice and now you've got a shit 4/4 trample in your hand and a giant growth. You either wait for your enabler and let me win or you play shit cards and let me win.[/QUOTE]
The problem is that you have a tendency to say "Deck is bad," but then it turns out you're just saying it based on the fact that you assume your personal Esper deck always has infinite Detention Sphere on call and that nobody sideboards against control.
To wit: "What happens when I killed your voice, your Fabled Hero and you only have Ghor-Clan and Giant Growth in your hand?!!?" That's not a good criticism, its just a statement about a very specific game-state.