...you win this round, Mr. Point.
Still <3 you baby. We'll have to play online sometime
...you win this round, Mr. Point.
Still <3 you baby. We'll have to play online sometime
No lie, my UWR deck is called Buffalo Control.
They're obvious in real life. Very glossy.As someone who's thinking of getting back into collecting Magic once again, this is extremely frightening: http://www.ebay.com/sch/mtgproxies131/m.html?item=291175985829&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2562
Fake:
Fake:
The Slivers are in M15 as an apology for how badly they were handled in M14, basically. Could show up in Khans block, but its unlikely, given the setting.Has there been anything to indicate or counterindicate that slivers might be present on this new upcoming plane? Or something in the upcoming standard season to indicate more sliver support? They said it's going to be an unusual structure, so maybe a normal set and some planeswalking entity introducing a sliver invasion in Tarkhir? I believe when introducing the M14 slivers, it was mentioned that someone is manipulating slivers to their own ends, hence their altered look.
The article that kicked off spoiler season basically says that slivers are only in M15 as a last-hurrah to fix the mistakes they made in M14 (the look and not having a sliver lord).Has there been anything to indicate or counterindicate that slivers might be present on this new upcoming plane?
Slivers!
What? Weren't Slivers M14's thing? Yes, they were, but I didn't want people who made Sliver decks in M14 to never get any new toys to play with. Because Slivers don't reside on Theros, M15 was the only other chance we had to get new Slivers into Standard alongside Galerider Sliver, Predatory Sliver, and the rest of the M14 crew. There is a cycle of five uncommons, many of which play well on their own and are devastating in combination, as well as a new mythic rare Sliver that every Sliver aficionado has been waiting for.
As someone who's thinking of getting back into collecting Magic once again, this is extremely frightening: http://www.ebay.com/sch/mtgproxies131/m.html?item=291175985829&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2562
The Slivers are in M15 as an apology for how badly they were handled in M14, basically. Could show up in Khans block, but its unlikely, given the setting.
It's not a full apology until we see an actual Sliver card and confirm they function like they should
Can you guys convince me why old symmetrical slivers are better for a reason besides "that is how it used to be"?
No arguments on the art, of course. (Though I would've been okay if it turned out the new slivers were Phyrexianized.)
Can you guys convince me why old symmetrical slivers are better for a reason besides "that is how it used to be"?
No arguments on the art, of course. (Though I would've been okay if it turned out the new slivers were Phyrexianized.)
Can you guys convince me why old symmetrical slivers are better for a reason besides "that is how it used to be"?
No arguments on the art, of course. (Though I would've been okay if it turned out the new slivers were Phyrexianized.)
Can you guys convince me why old symmetrical slivers are better for a reason besides "that is how it used to be"?
No arguments on the art, of course. (Though I would've been okay if it turned out the new slivers were Phyrexianized.)
New slivers play worlds better. Giving all slivers lifelink when your opponent had slivers, for instance, was incredibly obnoxious.It's not a full apology until we see an actual Sliver card and confirm they function like they should
now I want to make a janky all-creatures sliver deck just so I can have this manabase:
4 Sliver Hive
4 Cavern of Souls
4 City of Brass
4 Ancient Ziggurat
4 Mutavault
Talking about the power of monoblack reminds me of the many comments about how mono black would never be a thing and to not even try to make it one. heh
Very true. I just remember 'mono black' being the key word. Still, a menace.Mono B Devotion is not Mono B control.
New New World Order needs to have the "Mythics must be fucking playable goddamnit" clause. You're asking a lot of money for the product, and when you introduce rarities, it's not absurd for people to expect the most awesome rarity of all should be at least playable.
And, as always, the first person to say anything about EDH gets a free slap.
EDIT: Rocket, please to send me your email address.
And, as always, the first person to say anything about EDH gets a free slap.
New New World Order needs to have the "Mythics must be fucking playable goddamnit" clause. You're asking a lot of money for the product, and when you introduce rarities, it's not absurd for people to expect the most awesome rarity of all should be at least playable.
And, as always, the first person to say anything about EDH gets a free slap.
EDIT: Rocket, please to send me your email address.
playable in what? standard?
mythics should just be cool, don't really care if they're playable in standard or not
Fun Fact: Mythics are only very slightly more rare than rares used to be before mythics existed. All other rarities are basically just more common than they used to be.New New World Order needs to have the "Mythics must be fucking playable goddamnit" clause. You're asking a lot of money for the product, and when you introduce rarities, it's not absurd for people to expect the most awesome rarity of all should be at least playable.
And, as always, the first person to say anything about EDH gets a free slap.
EDIT: Rocket, please to send me your email address.
They buy cards too.
Vess is on the Toy Box and other marketing materials, so its been all but confirmed for a while. Not like he was spoiling anything major.
Mythics should be impressive and worth the "Mythic" tag in some way. Not Vengevine/VOR-type 4x value cards.
They probably didn't have time. They were making 4 others, and wouldn't have the art ready for a new one by the time they figured out that Thoughtseize + LOTV in Standard was a problem combined with all the other good black removal and Waste Not.They should have just made a new Liliana that's 4 CMC. 5 CMC PW are rarely all that playable unless they have bomb abilities.
As much as I dislike EDH, I've seen enough of it played to know this is not true.EDH is literally the format where anything is playable. That's the entire point of the format.
They probably didn't have time. They were making 4 others, and wouldn't have the art ready for a new one by the time they figured out that Thoughtseize + LOTV in Standard was a problem combined with all the other good black removal and Waste Not.
EDH is literally the format where anything is playable. That's the entire point of the format.
As much as I dislike EDH, I've seen enough of it played to know this is not true.
An example of a card playable in Standard, but unplayable in EDH
I blame everyone who voted for Waste Not.
They probably didn't have time. They were making 4 others, and wouldn't have the art ready for a new one by the time they figured out that Thoughtseize + LOTV in Standard was a problem combined with all the other good black removal and Waste Not.
As much as I dislike EDH, I've seen enough of it played to know this is not true.
By that logic you can also say it's 'playable' in legacy, vintage, modern and standard.I mean, it is though. The format was created because people wanted to play with their collection of cards. It's an unlimited format where anything, save for the few banned cards, is available to be put into a deck. The entire meta is one of brewing, which is why literally every card spoiled since the creation of the format will have 8 people (NO MORE NO LESS) saying "Oh, sweet, can't wait to try it in my EDH deck." So, saying "Well, that 9 mana take an extra turn card is totally sweet in my Zur deck" is the "Simpsons did it" of MtG,