Familienoberhauptvogel
Banned
They also confirmed a non basic cycle producing {C} btw. No details yet though.
I think Kozilek is worse than Ulamog so there's that.Wonder what Kozilek pre-orders start at...
Kozilek is a lot better that Ulamog as long as there's sufficient ways to produce colorless mana. Refilling your hand and countering spells is a lot better than getting two vindicates.I think Kozilek is worse than Ulamog so there's that.
EDIT: They just officially revealed Kozilek. Guess they are proceeding as if no leaks occurred. How many weeks ago was the Kozilek leak?
I think Kozilek is worse than Ulamog so there's that.
Kozilek is a lot better that Ulamog as long as there's sufficient ways to produce colorless mana. Refilling your hand and countering spells is a lot better than getting two vindicates.
I think the reason Ulamog is better is because ramping to 10 mana almost always means you're behind on board to begin with and Kozilek doesn't really help you there.
Different lenses, I guess. I see Kozilek more as a control finisher than a ramp finisher.I think the reason Ulamog is better is because ramping to 10 mana almost always means you're behind on board to begin with and Kozilek doesn't really help you there.
I kinda don't think they minded this specific one because a) it was limited and b) holy shit did it reduce the legwork they needed to do explaining Colorless Mana Symbols.
For the curious, Wastes has Oracle text of "{T}: Add {C} to your mana pool." Wastes is not a land type nor a type of mana. Just a card name.
There'll be a third. It just won't be in this block.Since Wastes is now confirmed to just be "Add (1)", and we know that there will be nonbasics that generate <>, it makes sense that there would only be two Wastes arts.
Tabak confirmed the Oracle text for Wastes:
So, theoretically, colorless basic lands would/could have different names in future blocks? SOI could have "Crypts," for instance.
Ah, makes sense, I thought it was an innate property of Wastes.
I hope the next preview isn't Mirrorpool
Tabak confirmed the Oracle text for Wastes:
So, theoretically, colorless basic lands would/could have different names in future blocks? SOI could have "Crypts," for instance.
Like I feel like text somewhere on a card should explain that a Hedron Archive or various Eldrazi Scions can cast a Kozilek that you drafted in the same draft, but there's actually nowhere for that to happen.
There's also the two legends that were leaked but those weren't digital but actual cards photographed so could be other cards.
I wonder if there will be reminder text for the <> mana costs or if it is just obvious enough that it works.
I would have assumed that a basic land without a type would produce C by default.
I don't know which cards you're thinking of, but they're probably just old allies from the first Zendikar block.Does anyone else think wizards subtly spoiled OATH cards in the BFZ expansion for duels? Gideon deck has a few new allies with rally. I don't think they've ever had a duels exclusive card.
Does anyone else think wizards subtly spoiled OATH cards in the BFZ expansion for duels? Gideon deck has a few new allies with rally. I don't think they've ever had a duels exclusive card.
You got a link to the Maro confirm? Also fuck yeah on colorless mana, this is a new age my friends
This whole block is a mess. <> would have been a huge announcement to kick off the block and would have been way better than devoid nonsense.rosewater got asked about this on tumblr - he said this was a divisive issue in r&d and he was on the side of including <> symbols on bfz cards, but r&d decided it would be even more confusing in limited to do it that way.
that said, making colorless act like a sixth color is such a splashy idea i think it could have carried two sets, and it makes me wonder why wotc even fucked around with devoid in the first place.
i've been too broke to play much magic past the occasional pre-release or draft recently and bfz did absolutely nothing for me during spoiler season so i didn't play any of it. even considering that, i'm so curious about how <> mana is going to work in a limited format i'm probably down for at least a prerelease and a few drafts. i guess bravo wizards on that front.
Agreed, it works better that way.Seems to me that it would have been a much better way to tie Eldrazi together in the large set, then, maaaaaaaaaaybe, introduce a scattering of devoid creatures in the second set, to signify the way even the native fauna on Zendikar is being corrupted.
Its a Kozilek thing. Ingest and Processors were an Ulamog thing. Different Eldrazi work a bit differently.
After a year they won't have to explain this. It will be common place.
Awww yas. Eldrazi ramp decks gonna look interesting.
My guess is that they decided to just eat it with regard to people moaning and groaning about it during the overlap of BFZ and OGW.
By far my biggest wish for OGW is that ♦ cards are actually good instead of garbage like snow mana cards were. Please make it worthwhile to draft Wastes.
But why does Ulamog create wastes producing it then?
I, too, am hoping they made good cards for this set.
Lately, though, I have little faith in that.
I played through yesterday and didn't notice any new ones. I think the Allies in that deck are either from BFZ or from original Zendikar block (like Hada Freeblade).
We can only hope that being designed by someone who didn't their entire design file pitched into a garbage can will help it be coherent.
Side effect of the processing. Interestingly enough, Kozilek can use those wastes as well (though is probably not as preferred as beautiful bismuth). I like the idea of the Eldrazi inadvertently helping each other with their mechanics. I'll be shocked if some of Kozilek's brood in this set don't exile (note, they don't have to have processors, just cards with exile on them).
After BFZ, I have serious doubts. I get that this is looking like the shakey-transition block between 3-set-blocks and 2-set-blocks, but they almost couldn't have done worse so far if they tried. If OGW is boring, this will go down as a low-point for the game, at least in my opinion.