Twin/Pod were both showing up as "extras" in established archetypes. Twin was no longer a distinct deck, it was a package slotted into tempo/control shells (and heck, even combo w/ living end.) Pod did the same thing, the printing of Siege Rhino caused Abzan/Jund to merge with Pod into a single archetype playing Thoughtseize and Rhino and Voice alongside a pod package. Those merges are incredibly unhealthy, and both decks contributed to the "oops i win" issue that had/has plagued the format since its inception.On the flip side, would there be any value in WotC instituting a Restricted list in Modern? How would only being able to play one Eye of Ugin affect the deck? What other cards would be eligible for a restricted list? Would there even be much of a difference between banned and restricted cards?
Ultimately, I recognize that emergency bans cover development mistakes by WotC and are often unavoidable (as opposed to bans like Splinter Twin or Birthing Pod), but disagree with the approach to managing Modern by maintaining a big, long list of powerful banned cards. Honestly, I might not feel so salty about it all if WotC was more liberal in unbanning cards, or, as someone suggested, putting cards on a watch list for a while before banning them.
(I should point out that I don't play the Eldrazi deck and have no real financial stakes in Eye or Temple being banned.)
(I've also been out of the loop recently due to a sick toddler and moving cities later this month, so feel free to slap me if I'm repeating already squashed arguments.)
Eye ban is different- this is just a broken deck.
Restricted lists lead to too much variance, they're only in Vintage because that's its shtick (play with as much as humanly possible.)