charlequin
Banned
"We want to make sure this deck sticks around"
REALLY bad stuff from Aaron
No, this is a good answer that proves that the people in R&D are actually interested in the long-term health of formats instead of just listening to the loudest assholes on Reddit. Banning cards always has a negative effect -- you're reducing the value of things that people paid money for and disrupting the utility of decks they've put effort into building. When you nuke them completely, people get mad -- as, indeed, they have about decks were gutted completely in the past.
Short of the type of existential threat there was at the end of combo winter or after the first failed round of Affinity bans, any time you can plausibly nerf a deck to solid Tier 2 status without destroying it completely, it's a better choice than blowing it up completely.