I mean, I could maybe see an argument that FFL somehow became convinced that 19 Discard style spells in Standard would create a UB turbo Discard that turned the game into "Your opponent must play the card they draw each turn." Inquisition can effectively shut down their early game, and then you just keep hurting their hand.
Granted, it sounds insane, but FFL was testing a Prism Array Deck at one point before they got it tweaked.
Turn 1 Polluted Delta, Sac, Swamp, Inquisition. Pass(Cards in Graveyard:2)
Turn 2: Flooded Strand, Sac, Island, Jace, Pass(Cards in graveyard: 3)
Turn 3: Mire, Sac, Swamp, Duress, Tap Jace, flip Jace, flashback Inquisition, take their Turn 3 play.
It's super grindy, but it would be one of those awful decks to play against.
Sylvan Advocate feels like a mistake to me. (As does the 3rd toughness on Reflector Mage.)
Not because it's too good, but because there's a clear gap in power between the BFZ manlands and the OGW ones, and I'm wondering how much of that has to do with the mere existence of that card.
Ugh, that would legit get me upset. It's insane that my Stirring Wildwood can be a 3/4 with Reach for 3 Mana, but my Needle Spires requires 1 more Mana for worse stats(Yes, it has double strike, but it dies to Chandra's Ping)