Poodlestrike
Banned
lol sure
I mean, not your idea of fun, but other people's? Sure.
I like Unsets okay. Not every joke lands but that's not the end of the world.
lol sure
are there any details on the new unset other than the fact it exists
like, if it's another barely playable bunch of 200 puns with full art basics it's a disaster, but i could see them trying to do a conspiracy-style draft environment where they came up with a bunch of weird mechanics that would be cool for a few drafts and kitchen table stuff. there's also like, the very obvious idea of reprints for staples with really dumb art - snapcaster as a giant hand snapping kind of shit. the last idea would obviously be divisive, but there's wiggle room for this thing not to just completely suck.
To be clear, the other two Unsets were designed to be drafted too.Rosewater said he designed it to be drafted so I assume it will be more... playable...
I must say though that people at my LGS are really excited to draft the new unset.
I'm kind of joking but kind of serious there, what exactly is so bad about this when WotC makes ten products every individual person doesn't want every year? Like why is this so fundamentally offensive compared to all the other stuff?
wotc is a company with limited resources as such any used on an Unset is a waste to my tastes.
Which isn't the worst but contrary to different products I can still get cards of interest to me from other supplemental products.
Heck I'm actively interested in trying a couple of the PW deck PWs.
I'm kind of joking but kind of serious there, what exactly is so bad about this when WotC makes ten products every individual person doesn't want every year? Like why is this so fundamentally offensive compared to all the other stuff?
Because it takes away development time from other sets! Which is reeeeeaaaalllly bad!!!! Please think of people with no humor!
Well they are the sort of company that could never return to Kamigawa for monetary reasons.So many people act like WOTC is hanging on by a thread (capital wise) and any slight misstep will be the death-knell for the company.
They are fine, as is Hasbro.
Hour of Devastation seems like a good argument for why they are getting rid of small sets.
So many people act like WOTC is hanging on by a thread (capital wise) and any slight misstep will be the death-knell for the company.
They are fine, as is Hasbro.
are there any details on the new unset other than the fact it exists
To be clear, the other two Unsets were designed to be drafted too.
So is it worth buying into modern? Whats a good deck to get my feet wet? I haven't played a constructed deck in about 4 years.
Well they are the sort of company that could never return to Kamigawa for monetary reasons.
So is it worth buying into modern? Whats a good deck to get my feet wet? I haven't played a constructed deck in about 4 years.
You can't at the same be arguing there's an upside to revisiting an unset but not to revisiting Kamigawa and ignoring MaRos literal words.That's not monetary reasons, it's just the fact that there's literally no upside to doing it.
MaRo tumblr said:I cant with a good conscience go to my bosses and say, of every option available to us, I recommend the world that was critically and financially one of most problematic worlds weve ever done.
White can deal with Planeswalkers just fine. Oblivion Ring, Banishing Light, etc.
Black can also deal with this new card (as long as it hasn't resolved yet) with discard and extraction effects like Sad Sac. There are also colorless ways to deal with the card. Since it only targets one player, in EDH, you can even get other players to get rid of it for you.
Since it's an Aura, with red you can get it with Shunt or Ricochet Trap.
IIRC, he said a while ago that Unsets did better than the Kamigawa sets.You can't at the same be arguing there's an upside to revisiting an unset but not to revisiting Kamigawa and ignoring MaRos literal words.
ru-ron asked:
All these Un-rules questions remind me of Kamigawa. You frequently mention that Kamigawa was unpopular by all metrics and we're not going back. Couldn't you say the same about unhinged? Gotcha was a bad idea. +1/2 is tough in a game that's already math heavy. Why do you want another un-set buy not another Kamigawa when they have similar pasts?
They have very dissimilar paths. The Un-sets tested well in market research. Kamigawa did not. The Un-sets plateaued at a sales level above where most sets do and continued to sell at a steady rate. Kamigawa block sales fell off a cliff.
The only problem the Un-sets had was that we printed them as if they were a small set rather than a supplemental set (supplemental sets were pretty new back then) and thus we overprinted them. Any set, no matter how good, will have problems if overprinted.
Heres a different way to think of this. Lets say I made an offer to a large number of game stores that sell older booster packs of Magic and told them that for free I was going to give them a box of either an Un-set or a set from Champions of Kamigawa block. I needed them to give me a priority list of what they wanted.
Heres the list the vast majority would give me:
Unglued
Unhinged
Champions of Kamigawa
Betrayers of Kamigawa
Saviors of Kamigawa
And if I offered either the two Un-sets or all three Champions of Kamigawa sets, the majority would take the Un-sets.
whitedudeontheinternet asked:
How can be so certain of un-sets versus Kamigawa today? Kamigawa has more mystique, and Un-sets have more stigma from enfranchised players who would buy these packs.
I dont have uncertainty. Unglued, Unhinged, Champions of Kamigawa, Betrayers of Kamigawa and Saviors of Kamigawa all currently exist. Stores sell these packs.
Theres data right now on how they sell and that data says that the Un-sets sell better than the Kamigawa sets.
Thats why I dont need a poll. There is actual data on which players prefer to buy.
The only reason I'm not is because I honestly have no idea how well they sell, other than I don't know anyone at all who buys them. Maybe it's made up for by some weirdos who buy entire playsets of the junk.
That's amazing but besides the point. Yes magic is doing well for Hasbro but they appear to care very much about profitability and spending as little as possible.IIRC, he said a while ago that Unsets did better than the Kamigawa sets.
EDIT: Here
EDIT: And another
So is it worth buying into modern? Whats a good deck to get my feet wet? I haven't played a constructed deck in about 4 years.
Are we kink shaming spanking?
Hadn't elves switched to GW because of Vizier? You're already running CoCos and Chord and devited druid is an elf and Ezuri is a win through infinite mana.
Most online communities that you see online are going to skew toward competitive and semi-competitive players. Casual players are the silent majority and there are plenty of them that are excited for Unstable.Man, I'm surprised at the reactions to the Unset. I don't play any more, I was really into Magic in middle school and high school and dropped it in college mostly because I couldn't afford it, but I still like to lurk in these threads to see what's going on in new expansions and stuff. I always thought the Un-sets were really fun, my friends and I all loved them and they're an awesome fan service, self-reflecting, why-the-hell-not kind of thing. They're basically to Magic what Hot Fuzz is to action movies, and I always thought it was really cool that Wizard invested in something that's sort of pointless but that they clearly have fun making.
I always thought they were really popular, beloved by the community, honestly kind of disappointed that apparently many people view it as a waste of resources.
Man, I'm surprised at the reactions to the Unset. I don't play any more, I was really into Magic in middle school and high school and dropped it in college mostly because I couldn't afford it, but I still like to lurk in these threads to see what's going on in new expansions and stuff. I always thought the Un-sets were really fun, my friends and I all loved them and they're an awesome fan service, self-reflecting, why-the-hell-not kind of thing. They're basically to Magic what Hot Fuzz is to action movies, and I always thought it was really cool that Wizard invested in something that's sort of pointless but that they clearly have fun making.
I always thought they were really popular, beloved by the community, honestly kind of disappointed that apparently many people view it as a waste of resources.
Modern is the best constructed format not called EDH.
Also, great intro Modern Decks(that are relatively stable in terms of cards used) include Elves(GB is generally the way to go due to Shaman of the Pack), Merfolk, Affinity, etc.
The biggest pitfall is buying into a deck following it doing well at one event (IE Skred) and then watching as it becomes worse and worse. Luckily, I'd say most every good idea can viable at competitive provided you know enough about how your deck works/the meta.
Wheel of Fortune > godlike 4x Hollow One draw > Profit?
Also goes well with Burning Inquiry in older formats.
You can't at the same be arguing there's an upside to revisiting an unset but not to revisiting Kamigawa and ignoring MaRos literal words.
While I think Legacy is probably the "best" constructed format, Modern is probably the best to buy into, as it's significantly cheaper, has a larger playerbase, and more tourneys.
I always thought they were really popular, beloved by the community, honestly kind of disappointed that apparently many people view it as a waste of resources.
That's a pretty good combo w/ Cathartic reunion.
In a deck that already wants to use Cathartic Reunion, it seems like it would be easy enough to slot in Hollow One. Probably not the best build, but the turn 2 4x Hollow One Christmasland scenario would be amazing when it happens.
EDIT: Wait, they will still be (1) each without an additional discard outlet, never mind.
Our thread (for a variety of reasons) leans heavily to casual-competitive (as in not a huge time investment but play primarily tourney formats) players, so basically the opposite of the target audience. As a whole we tend to be a bit more negative even on a lot of things that are glowingly received elsewhere, like Conspiracy. There's a ton of love for the Un-sets elsewhere.
That dude looks very goofy with no hands.
Also, that card doesn't feel like a rare at all.
Buying into eldrazi tron. Thoughts on the deck? I just need chalices (spiking a ton I know) and a couple eyes to make stompy in legacy.
The good thing is that all the additional pieces for legacy I already own (save the eyes) and city of traitors is not specifically needed for the most part. It's a bit less all in compared with red stompy and having a bunch of 5/5s is much more reasonable in terms of winning compared with 2 damage via Chandra or pinging people with your draws with Hazoret or sin prodder.