I wish they'd redesign the PW frame, it's terrible with all the oval shapes. A legacy from Future Sight that should long have been rectified.They're being weirdly hesitant about putting non-loyalty abilities (besides "X can be your commander" and Garruk's transformation ability) on planeswalkers, which I assume means they want to do it as a big splashy thing. I think the bigger issue is that doing that basically means using the four-ability frame and they probably feel like they haven't quite gotten all the juice they want out of that.
reddit said 0-2-1 in limited.He 0-3d limited but managed to get to 4-4 in Standard
4-1 standard either 0-3 or 0-2-1 in limitedI'm confused, so how did Amaz do in the first day?
Because 0-2-1 +4-4 implies that we had 11 rounds.
They're trying to dissuade flippers w/ the SDCC stuff, it ended up at like 160-ish this year. Can't blame em.While they aren't for me, I have to say, I'm happy with how the Hascon cards came out. The fact that it's only $30 instead of the $100 they charge for SDCC walkers helps a lot.
I wish they'd redesign the PW frame, it's terrible with all the oval shapes. A legacy from Future Sight that should long have been rectified.
Yeah we've talked about triggered abilities before with PW and them wanting to go through more regular designs first but I don't think cycling actually falls under that being activated and only of relevance in hand.
While they aren't for me, I have to say, I'm happy with how the Hascon cards came out. The fact that it's only $30 instead of the $100 they charge for SDCC walkers helps a lot.
They're trying to dissuade flippers w/ the SDCC stuff, it ended up at like 160-ish this year. Can't blame em.
I think all three are pretty good gimmicks and reasonably designed cards given the brands they're targeting, and the Sword gives me a pretty good feeling about Unstable -- it's cute but not in an obnoxious way, and it's clearly designed to be actually usable as a real card in things like Commander or Cube.
Not a rhetorical question: do you think they really benefit more from doing it this way than just, say, tripling the print run and making it more plausible for people to easily get at the show?
I think once you decide on a print run it's better to try and guess the market rate based on past years instead of letting people just stockpile en masse to flip.INot a rhetorical question: do you think they really benefit more from doing it this way than just, say, tripling the print run and making it more plausible for people to easily get at the show?
Sure but those are design features I'm speaking of the framing of the art mostly which is oval for PWs but still perfectly rectangular for the m15 frame. For the same reason, and others, I loathe Zendikar full art land frames these days.I mean if anything the Planeswalker frame was the antecedent to the Magic 2015 frame -- it's got the same rounded corners, same non-rectangle swoopy shape, same white-on-black legal text.
I like the m15 frame, it's easily recognizable and easy on the eyes but PW frame is doing way too much compared, I like the full art and the art trasncedning the frame that's fine but everyhting else is kinda overdesigned. So many edges and curves. Like why is there an addittional indent on the bottom above the hologram?
PV won against Seth's great deck anyway. #izzetlife
I think once you decide on a print run it's better to try and guess the market rate based on past years instead of letting people just stockpile en masse to flip.
Sure but those are design features I'm speaking of the framing of the art mostly which is oval for PWs but still perfectly rectangular for the m15 frame.
Unhinged got it right.
Maro answered sigma's ask and said that the "transform" thing is only for Grimlock, which honestly kind of makes it weirder.
Yeah, this matches with what I remember of the arcane weirdness of the HEX/MTG lawsuit.This guy claims that they legally can't say Transformers transform. Which is weird, but just weird enough to be true.
Unhinged lands with a proper typeline below the art would be the perfect frame, set symbol stuck in the border is terrible, but yeah the art on unglued ones is superior. The tap symbol on top is bothering me during play a lot otoh, I end up untapping them upside down on a regular basisAhh, okay. Yeah there are some weird issues with the planeswalker frame. I don't think the rounded bottom is an issue but there's no reason for the art box to have oval edges instead of just curved corners like the text box, and the uneven shape of the type line and the little flanges at the bottom are distracting.
To be honest, I think they need to do another frame redesign. The core of M15 is good (and now that we've had it for a while, clearly an improvement over 8E imo) but there's still other stuff they should tweak. I think they should start using the Future Sight type icons all the time (they could put them where the DFC indicators go, since we know that doesn't negatively impact the design) and maybe make use of a few other advancements, like using a special frame treatment with P/T box for every non-creature that can animate.
The Unglued lands are still my favorite overall cards holistically speaking (dat Nielsen forest!) but these are easily the best full-art frames, just because they focus 100% on maximizing the art space on the card.
This has been the most honest piece of coverage wizards has ever put out since I've started watching.
It probably means he doesn't have custody of his kid :-(LSV already quitting being a full time caster lol
Back to playing he goes.
It probably means he doesn't have custody of his kid :-(
or that he and Gaby are trying to conceive.It probably means he doesn't have custody of his kid :-(
LSV literally announced right when he first decided to do this that it'd be for one year, Kaladesh through Hour of Devastation?
LSV literally announced right when he first decided to do this that it'd be for one year, Kaladesh through Hour of Devastation?
SO Fraying Sanity went 1-1-1 at FNM.
I need to get Pull from Tomorrow in my SB, I want to be able to draw a shitton of cards and look for more mill cards.
Can you win against monored at all? Seems like mill would be both too slow and too uninteractive to do anything against it.
They can legally say it, but Hasbro doesn't whenever possible, because you can't trademark or copyright "transform" in that usage, so it could easily become a brand name used generically to mean any toy that changes form, like Kleenex or Xerox have become with their usage. Hasbro wants to avoid that legal loophole so they always refer to the toys "changing" or "converting," not transforming. This does not seem to be a rule adhered to in the fiction, for the most part, but definitely is with the merch.
Just checking in. Ooh, Locust God is seeing play?