I think SOlive might have posted up something similar as well.Well shit. I was too busy thinking 'lol dredge' in my head.
I think SOlive might have posted up something similar as well.Well shit. I was too busy thinking 'lol dredge' in my head.
The can differ a bit since some decks are close to unplayable online.When MTGO turned into the Jund mirror or Dredge I knew it had taken over.
Decks seem to show up or adapt to different versions faster on MTGO than paper
No, it's Isobel
"I'm sorry BlackMarvel, but this lore is just too much, I need to take off my coat"
This among other reasons, at least for me hahahathis is why you and i are not pro players
I mean, at least according to that link, Isobel is Flameblade Angel.
EDIT: Is there an alternate art Flameblade Angel I didn't know about?
I know, I just wanted to post that again.
It's one of the Intro Pack foil promos.
Why is it when I don't draft properly and I just take money cards that doesn't make it in the deck, i go 2-1 or 3-0, but then when I try to draft properly and pass up money rares, I get punished and go 0-2-drop? Why?! Every time!
Why is it when I don't draft properly and I just take money cards that doesn't make it in the deck, i go 2-1 or 3-0, but then when I try to draft properly and pass up money rares, I get punished and go 0-2-drop? Why?! Every time!
So my friends and I will be drafting a box of Shadows Over Innistrad this weekend (my first draft!) Any tips?
They wouldn't replace Bob just add lili. I can see lili and snap being both mythics next mm set.They've already actively tried to reprint LotV though. I wouldn't be shocked if she replaced Dark Confidant in MM3. Damnation has also been spoken about recently, and as for Cavern, I'd say Horizon Canopy is more due for a reprint. I honestly wouldn't mind if they reprinted most of the Future Sight lands in MM3 (though Graven Cairns seems underwhleming at this moment it's a nearly $9 card).
Why not? I feel like they could reset some of its equity and shelve it until like MM4 or MM5.They wouldn't replace Bob just add lili. I can see lili and snap being both mythics next mm set.
They wouldn't replace Bob just add lili. I can see lili and snap being both mythics next mm set.
Any specific reason why Engineered Explosives in Fifth Dawn appear to be spiking? Is the MM version to follow?
Survey for Conspiracy 2
Days of Future Future - Eldritch Moon
* Werewolf decks were strong in testing. They haven't appeared in the real world due to Collected Company and Dromoka's Command being stronger than expected. Though the deck itself was running CoCo in testing.
* After Pro Tour Magic Origins, the takeaway was that Green-White Megamorph was going to be the big deck in Standard, so they tested with a lot of that instead of Green-White Tokens and CoCo.
* Coverage for that PT, by the way, which goes a long way in explaining things if that was the most recent information they were working off of. Note the dominance of red decks and the complete lack of CoCo, which doesn't appear at all in the top 8 or 24-27 point deck lists.
* They did hit pretty close with their test White-Black Control deck.
* They were expecting Mono-Red Aggro to be much stronger than it was. They failed to consider that it would be completely stymied by all the 2/3 creatures and Always Watching.
* Westvale Abbey originally had "pay 6 life" as part of its activation cost (for transforming?), so Green-White Tokens instead ran Foundry of the Consuls in testing.
* Heron's Grace Champion used to be a "hatebear" (granted, 4-mana 3/3), but they identified that Green-White was getting too strong and weakened it.
* They tested Cat Pact (Harmless Offering + Demonic Pact).
I just don't understand how they didn't think CoCo was busted in testing or that all the stupid 2/3's in the format stop any type of aggro deck from existing.
I just don't understand how they didn't think CoCo was busted in testing or that all the stupid 2/3's in the format stop any type of aggro deck from existing.
I just don't understand how they didn't think CoCo was busted in testing or that all the stupid 2/3's in the format stop any type of aggro deck from existing.
A lot of people in development are former pro players, so i don't think that's it. I think it's more a case of lots of things being in flux (cards are constantly changing during testing) and and inbred meta during testing. Sort of how sometimes a random Standard deck can beat a modern or legacy deck simply because the decks in older formats aren't designed to answer things that wouldn't show up in those formats.Sometimes it feels like they just aren't very good at the game?
I don't understand why on earth this would be allowed. It's an insane value pack? Great! Your neighbor will be super happy too!Man, my pulls were insane at the conspiracy draft last night. Opened a foil Leopold and imperial recruiter. The store let me rebut a pack because it was too much value to pass and I open show and tell in the replacement pack and daretti in the next.
Any specific reason why Engineered Explosives in Fifth Dawn appear to be spiking? Is the MM version to follow?
And here. we. go.
Correct, it lets you ignore one, it's a simpler execution.The modularity is just to handle the possibility of invalid targets right? I don't see why you would ever just choose one if both have valid choices.
blogatog said:2) Contraptions are not a great fit creatively for Kaladesh in ways I can explain after PAX.
I just don't understand how they didn't think CoCo was busted in testing or that all the stupid 2/3's in the format stop any type of aggro deck from existing.
And here. we. go.
This card is awesome, and yet tells us absolutely nothing new about the set, lol.
I assume this is from a retailer poster, so where's the rest of it?
Man, my pulls were insane at the conspiracy draft last night. Opened a foil Leopold and imperial recruiter. The store let me rebut a pack because it was too much value to pass and I open show and tell in the replacement pack and daretti in the next.
That is pretty insane value to somehow pull an Imperial Recruiter out of a Conspiracy 2 pack.
Hmmmmmm.
If you follow the development postmortems for a while it becomes pretty clear how they wind up with these kind of mistakes. They by definition can't have a metagame as refined as the real-world one because they're six people with limited time instead of thousands of people grinding away at all hours of the day, so they have to rely on a judgment of card power with a margin of error attached. Normally this works out fine -- if they assume a card is great they nerf it a little, if they assume it's good it might be great or underperform and be just okay. When they apply this principle to everything in the format it usually produces several different archetypes that average out to Tier-1-ish level, even if they're not exactly what they expected.
Normally part of why this works is that they rely on natural variance: if they're pretty good overall at power estimation, cards will equally often be better or worse than their guess. Generally across a format that variance evens out and the overall power level comes in around expectations. However, because that variance is random, sometimes it's going to line up such that multiple cards that go together are all stronger than expected, and other archetypes have multiple cards all worse than expected.
If you look at this specific case, they never had any question that CoCo would be a tournament card, but their expectation was that you'd see different types of decks that ran it as a value booster. In order for it to become dominant as its own archetype the quality of creatures it turns up has to be high enough, and they have to all support the same type of strategy -- which, as others have noted, is why CoCo only became an environmental problem when multiple creatures that perfectly fit the shell all turned out better than expected. And then some natural predators of the deck wound up having several components lower than expected at the same time.
(And then of course add to all this the fact that cards are in flux throughout the process and they can't retest the final versions to the same extent as all the pre-final testing.)
This card is awesome, and yet tells us absolutely nothing new about the set, lol.
I assume this is from a retailer poster, so where's the rest of it?
And here. we. go.