aeroslash
Member
Seems more logical than copying a scene straight out of Blow.
I've been saying fire in the avionics compartment all along too..
Seems more logical than copying a scene straight out of Blow.
Yep only one big ping in the radar, but in reality they would just fly close to the ground to avoid radar
After this incident they're surely going to look at hard-wiring a small, simple emergency beacon of sorts that is entirely inaccessible and un-switch offable to anyone that transmits GPS co-ordinates on request?
After this incident they're surely going to look at hard-wiring a small, simple emergency beacon of sorts that is entirely inaccessible and un-switch offable to anyone that transmits GPS co-ordinates on request?
Equally with some sort of fitting sensor that detects water and as soon as it does transmits the same GPS data.
That guy has quite the holier than though attitude. First off that theory has been out there since day 1 but it's been pretty much tossed aside now because that puts it in the main search area and they haven't seen any of it there.Not sure if it's been posted but this an interesting take on what could have happened from a pilot.
https://plus.google.com/106271056358366282907/posts/GoeVjHJaGBz
Already exists. http://www.findmespot.com/mobile/
CNN reporting is such a black mark to journalism
Captain Wearing a democracy is dead shirt and participating in rallies ? Thats suspicious
Co pilot inviting teen girls to cockpit ? Thats suspicious because being a son of an airline pilot i know for a fact this is a frequent occurance outside the USA
Bit off point but this was actually a project in my digital signal processing class at college (although it was simplified to meet our course). With proper discreet signal filtering you can actually identify more than 1 aircraft that is coming your way on the radar. However, it's tricky and I remember reading that not all radar's are capable of it (although I'm sure a military radar could).
How is it not? If the plane was hijacked and he was in on it, he was most likely pissed at his or another countries politics.
How is it not? If the plane was hijacked and he was in on it, he was most likely pissed at his or another countries politics.
How is it not? If the plane was hijacked and he was in on it, he was most likely pissed at his or another countries politics.
How is it not? If the plane was hijacked and he was in on it, he was most likely pissed at his or another countries politics.
CNN made an interesting point. The political person that the pilot was very vocal about, was sentenced to jail on the day the flight took off.
CNN made an interesting point. The political person that the pilot was very vocal about, was sentenced to jail on the day the flight took off.
Pretty much. Simple concept. A few tweaks and again an emergency 'transmit oh no I've just hit water' function thrown in.
Heck, even ignoring the human cost and going in terms of pure metal - at the moment they've no idea where a $60,000,000 aircraft is. Kinda worth it.
Humoring the arrogant fire in the cockpit theory from Google+, could the (claimed?) ascent to 45000' be explained by an attempt to extinguish a fire in the structure e.g. reducing oxygen available.
Still wouldn't explain the communications blackout though.
I do think the 777 piggyback theory is more interesting. How close should you try and follow the plane to make your radar signature non-suspicious enough? If the militaries are expecting a 777 to follow that path, would they ignore a slightly strange signal of two 777s instead of one?
You know battery technology has not drastically improved in the last 20 years right? These black boxes run on battery too.
Not sure if it's been posted but this an interesting take on what could have happened from a pilot.
https://plus.google.com/106271056358366282907/posts/GoeVjHJaGBz
I wonder if they are finding anything on the dudes flight sim. It seems rather obvious if he did it he would of practiced his intended route, but surely he would of wiped his hard drive before doing it? Actually if it was me (or anyone with computer knowledge) he would of just taken the hard drive with him as he would have to know that digital forensics teams could recover the deleted data?
Maybe though the intention was to have already hit his target so he didn't care?
To me it seems that a hijack, then co-pilot/passengers or crew attempting to regain control of the plane and a crash is the most likely outcome.
You can't really have things in the airplane hard wired in a sense they don't even have a circuit breaker on them..
But it doesn't explain the 45,000 feet ascent, and then the descent.Not sure if it's been posted but this an interesting take on what could have happened from a pilot.
https://plus.google.com/106271056358366282907/posts/GoeVjHJaGBz
Legit question - why not and could they not engineer a solution to accomodate an isolated, last resort tracker that is embedded in a way that is wholly inaccessible?
That doesn't make a lot of sense to me based on what we have heard. Unless something has changed, my understanding is that the pilot called "all right good night" after the transponder and ACARS were off. If a fire caused them to be turned off, it is very difficult to believe that he was not aware of the issue. Furthermore, for the flight to carry on for another 7 hours is difficult to believe if there was a substantial enough fire to turn off major systems and incapacitate the crew.
It's "would have", not "would of". Just FYI.
Actually it has. Significantly. It hasn't kept up with the increases in energy needs from most devices, particularly smartphones, but to say it hasn't significantly improved is very misguided.
Legit question - why not and could they not engineer a solution to accomodate an isolated, last resort tracker that is embedded in a way that is wholly inaccessible?
If I were buying a fleet of Aircrafts after this, I'd want some kind of guarantee I could find it if I needed to. The success in a fundamental way of this thing just vanishing could potentially inspire potential hijackers even if this thing wasn't hijacked in the way we think.
Excellent contribution to the thread!
They could, but those things would have to work by satellite, which costs a lot of money. In the cut throat airline business, such costs are prohibitive, as long as not everyone is forced to have them.
Completely agree - but in terms of costs, a $60million lost 777 is going to be compounded with an absolute catastrophic crash in the confidence of an entire Airline and even into their Tourist industry. Can they afford not to?
Not sure if it's been posted but this an interesting take on what could have happened from a pilot.
https://plus.google.com/106271056358366282907/posts/GoeVjHJaGBz
This is the simplest and IMO best explanation so far. People should start looking alone that route.
This is the simplest and IMO best explanation so far. People should start looking alone that route.
But with the amount of search parties now looking everywhere possible, I would expect it's signal to be heard eventually if it's out there.
The more time that passes without debris or a black box signal, the more likely the plane was successfully stolen and landed elsewhere imo
This was posted before the revelation that alright goodnight was said AFTER ACARS and the transponder was turned off
Edit: beaten
They've actually done a U-turn on this today
They've actually done a U-turn on this today and said things that contradict it
Saying it's "inconclusive" does not equal a "U-turn".
They've actually done a U-turn on this today and said things that contradict it
Link ? Didnt read that today
Completely agree - but in terms of costs, a $60million lost 777 is going to be compounded with an absolute catastrophic crash in the confidence of an entire Airline and even into their Tourist industry. Can they afford not to?
If you want to find Falks excellent press conference transcripts, search the thread for 'falkrant' and you will find them all.Link ? Didnt read that today
While this isn't that relevant to the discussion, a 777-ER costs 260mil+. Thats quite a difference to 60mil.
But Malaysia Airlines CEO Ahmad Jauhari Yahya said today that authorities dont know exactly when ACARS was disabled, according to The New York Times. The system, which transmits updates on a regular schedule, made its last transmission at 1:07 a.m. The next transmission should have occurred at 1:37, but did not. The pilots last communication was at 1:19 a.m.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/...unications-timeline-104729.html#ixzz2wENSAomK