BruiserBear
Banned
All I know about this story is I don't believe for one second that plane landed anywhere.
Just trying to help a brother out. Anyway, it's not like this thread is a shining beacon of amazing and informative posts right now.
it's still airborneAll I know about this story is I don't believe for one second that plane landed anywhere.
Before he left home, he took off his wedding ring and watch and gave them to his wife for his two young sons.
A vigil for the missing passengers has been held in the Malaysian capital of Kuala Lumpur. "If something should happen to me then the wedding ring should go to the first son that gets married and the watch to the second," wife Danica Weeks was quoted by media as saying.
That's sketchy unless it was a pre-flight thing he did all the time.
He was going on a long trip for work. He was going to be away from his kids and wife and they were worried. I saw his wife in tears on TV.
That was posted 3 days ago, before info came out about satellite pings that lasted for hours.
Chris Goodfellow said:Diego and all who have commented - thank you.
I wrote this post before the information regarding the engines continuing to run for approximately six hours and the fact it seems acars was shut down before the transponder.
The continued speculation of hijack and/or murder suicide and the latest this morning that there was a flight engineer on board that is being investigated does not do much to sway me in favour of foul play until I am presented with evidence of foul play.
My post received a lot of comments on Reddit as well if some of you wish to read those. www.reddit.com MH370.
Now let me deal with Diego's request for my present view in light of new evidence.
We know there was a last voice transmission that from a pilot's point of view (POV) was entirely normal. The good night is customary on a hand -off to a new ATC control. The good night also indicates STRONGLY to me all was OK on the flight deck. Remember there are many ways a pilot can communicate distress - the hijack code or even a transponder code different by one digit from assigned would alert ATC that something was wrong. Every good pilot knows keying an SOS over the mike is always an option even three short clicks would raise an alert.
So I conclude at that point of voice transmission all was perceived as well on the flight deck by the pilots.
But things could have been in the process of going wrong unknown to the pilots -
Evidently the ACARS went inoperative some time before. Disabling the ACARS is not easy as pointed out. This leads me to believe more in an electric or electric fire issue than a manual shutdown. I suggest the pilots were probably not aware it was not transmitting.
The next event is the turn to the SW in what appears direct Langkawi.
As I said in the first post the pilot probably had this in his head already.
Someone said why didn't he go to KBR on north coast of Malaysia which was closer. That's a 6,000 foot runway and to put that plane down on a 6,000 foot strip at night uncertain of your aircraft's entire systems is not an option. I would expect the pilot would consider ditching before a 6,000 runway if still above maximum landing weight which he likely was.
The safest runway in the region to make the approach was certainly Langkawi - no obstacles over water with a long flat approach. In my humble opinion this 18,000 hour pilot knew this instinctively.
Reports of altitude fluctuations. Well given that this was not transponder generated data but primary radar at maybe 200 miles the azimuth readings can be affected by a lot of atmospherics and I would not have high confidence in this being totally reliable. But let's accept for a minute he might have ascended to 45,000 in a last ditch effort to quell a fire by seeking the lowest level of oxygen. It is an acceptable scenario in my opinion. At 45,000 it would be tough to keep this aircraft stable as the flight envelope is very narrow and loss of control in a stall is entirely possible. The aircraft is at the top of its operational ceiling. The reported rapid rates of descent could have been generated by a stall and recovery at 25,000. The pilot may even have been diving the aircraft to extinguish flames. All entirely possible.
But going to 45,000 in a hijack scenario doesn't make any good sense to me.
The question of the time the plane flew on.
On departing Kuala he would have had fuel for Beijing and alternate probably Shanghai and 45 minutes. Say 8 hours. Maybe more. He burned 20-25% in first hour with takeoff, climb to cruise. So when the turn was made towards Langkawi he would have had six hours or more. This correlates nicely with the immarsat data pings being received until fuel exhaustion.
The apparent now known continued flight until TTFE time to fuel exhaustion only actually confirms to me the crew were incapacitated and the flight continued on deep into the south Indian ocean.
There really is no point in speculating further until more evidence surfaces but in the meantime it serves no purpose to malign the pilots who well may have been in an heroic struggle to save this aircraft from a fire or other serious mechanical issue and were overcome.
I hope the investigation team looks at the maintenance records of the front gear tires - cycles, last pressure check and maintenance inspection. Captain or F/O as part of pre-flight looks at tires. Is there any video at the airport to support pre-flight walkaround? Any damage on pushback? A day after I wrote the original post a plane in the U.S. blew a tire in takeoff and the t/o was fortunately aborted with a burning tire.
Hopefully - and I believe now it is a slim hope - the wreckage will be found and the FDR and VDR will be recovered and provide us with insight. Until facts prove otherwise, I would give the Captain the benefit of respect and professional courtesy.
He has since responded in the comments:
He has since responded in the comments:
This is the simplest and IMO best explanation so far. People should start looking alone that route.
Its not about the pilot, just a passenger from Aus who had to move away from his family due to new job. I wouldn't call that as alarming,
More like grasping at straws IMO.
That makes a lot of sense. I also just heard on the radio this morning that officials now are not sure if the last transmission actually occurred after some stuff was switched off or not.
He has since responded in the comments:
Yeah, I'm going with this theory. Mechanical failures that lead to an electrical fire, pilot attempts to head to nearest capable airport for an emergency landing, ends up becoming incapacitated along the way, plane continues flying until running out of fuel, crashes in the ocean. Infinitely more plausible than the idea that he snuck into Afghanistan with a 777 full of passengers.
Yeah the only problem I have is the selective nature of the fire burning - burn comm systems, incapacitate the crew, but auto-pilot still keeps going? I don't now anything about a cockpit so...
And how did a fire burning for 7 hours not destroy the plane well well before hand?
I cannot believe they havent found this yet....
Are you kidding me? How do they screw up basic facts like whether communications were disabled before or after the last fucking transmission? That's rather important.
Yeah the only problem I have is the selective nature of the fire burning - burn comm systems, incapacitate the crew, but auto-pilot still keeps going? I don't now anything about a cockpit so...
The author is starting with a hypothesis (a pilot wouldn't do this), and trying to match the facts to fit it.
Well they don't know if the comm system was burned or switched off.
If it was a tire fire like the guy is suggesting it might not have damaged anything, but it would be normal for the pilots to turn off electric systems if the cabin was filling with smoke. They may not have had time to turn the transponder back on before they passed out or died due to smoke.
Basically:
Cabin fills with smoke
Pilots turn off electric systems
set new course for emergency landing
turn on autopilot
pass out/die
????
But in terms of such a bias wasn't this the same guy whose first hypothesis involve the Pilots indeed doing or being coerced to do it - flying in the shadow of SIA68 - or was that another guy?
Oh I'm sorry I thought we were in the space age, not stuck in the dark ages.
Hard to believe they would not send a quick SOS distress call before shutting off the systems under your scenario.
Well they don't know if the comm system was burned or switched off.
If it was a tire fire like the guy is suggesting it might not have damaged anything, but it would be normal for the pilots to turn off electric systems if the cabin was filling with smoke. They may not have had time to turn the transponder back on before they passed out or died due to smoke.
Basically:
Cabin fills with smoke
Pilots turn off electric systems
set new course for emergency landing
turn on autopilot
pass out/die
????
Hard to believe they would not send a quick SOS distress call before shutting off the systems under your scenario.
Well they don't know if the comm system was burned or switched off.
If it was a tire fire like the guy is suggesting it might not have damaged anything, but it would be normal for the pilots to turn off electric systems if the cabin was filling with smoke. They may not have had time to turn the transponder back on before they passed out or died due to smoke.
Basically:
Cabin fills with smoke
Pilots turn off electric systems
set new course for emergency landing
turn on autopilot
pass out/die
????
Hard to believe they would not send a quick SOS distress call before shutting off the systems under your scenario.
this. calling for help has to be on the checklist for smoke in the cockpit?
I wish they had confirmed or denied the accout of the other 777 pilot who claims to have had radio contact on an emergency frequency.
CNN reporting is such a black mark to journalism
Captain Wearing a democracy is dead shirt and participating in rallies ? Thats suspicious
Co pilot inviting teen girls to cockpit ? Thats suspicious because being a son of an airline pilot i know for a fact this is a frequent occurance outside the USA
Dont forget pilots' ties to Anwar Ibrahim and secret Iranian operatives.CHEEZMO;104723508 said:I dunno bro. Throw in some secret jungle air base and nerve gas and malaysian al Qaeda operatives and then I'll pay attention but until then you're a crazy person jumping to conclusions thinking you've got it all figured out.
Why did authorities explicitly state that everything was disabled *prior* to the last communication being sent out if it was an overlapping window the entire time?ACARS is periodic. They can know when the last transmission was sent but I'm not sure how they would be able to tell when during the time between that connection and the next it was switched off.
you mean this? http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...e-made-contact-with-missing-malaysian-flight/
No press release has touched on that? wtf
Yeah, I'm going with this theory. Mechanical failures that lead to an electrical fire, pilot attempts to head to nearest capable airport for an emergency landing, ends up becoming incapacitated along the way, plane continues flying until running out of fuel, crashes in the ocean. Infinitely more plausible than the idea that he snuck into Afghanistan with a 777 full of passengers.
CHEEZMO™;104723508 said:I dunno bro. Throw in some secret jungle air base and nerve gas and malaysian al Qaeda operatives and then I'll pay attention but until then you're a crazy person jumping to conclusions thinking you've got it all figured out.
Well they don't know if the comm system was burned or switched off.
If it was a tire fire like the guy is suggesting it might not have damaged anything, but it would be normal for the pilots to turn off electric systems if the cabin was filling with smoke. They may not have had time to turn the transponder back on before they passed out or died due to smoke.
Basically:
Cabin fills with smoke
Pilots turn off electric systems
set new course for emergency landing
turn on autopilot
pass out/die
????
But in terms of such a bias wasn't this the same guy whose first hypothesis involve the Pilots indeed doing or being coerced to do it - flying in the shadow of SIA68 - or was that another guy?
Read the latest news from today. They changed their minds. Now it was a window of time in which the transponder was shut down, ranging from before the last transmission until sometime afterwards.Transponder was shut off BEFORE the Captain radioed "goodnight". That alone completely negates a theory like this.
Hasn't this been recently been unconfirmed again?Transponder was shut off BEFORE the Captain radioed "goodnight". That alone completely negates a theory like this.