Ether_Snake
å®å®å®å®å®å®å®å®å®å®å®å®å®å®å®
So that was the object seen on all satellites photos then? It has the same dark spot in the middle...
Imagine if in fact they are searching in the wrong location.
This is the recent news, and there are reactions to how the families were notifed.Just waking up... so did they actually find something this time or is it still debris yet to be identified?
Did some people really think they would be alive at this point?
How did it end up there anyway? This is still so fucking puzzling.
Haha, first grief over how the airline released info, now grief over how it's being released by the media. Can someone complain about how I released this post? This is hilarious from afar.Did Sky News really release this information by taking a screenshot of someone's note app on their phone?
This is the recent news, and there are reactions to how the families were notifed.
I think the families were hoping for that, yes.
How did it end up there anyway? This is still so fucking puzzling.
Didn't some dude survive in the ocean for like months? Sorry but until they find it I don't think you can say all lives are lost.
To me it seems to be looking less and less likely that they have seen any debris from the actual plane. It seems most was based on the big white thing seen in satellites, which appears to have just been the whale carcass.
I wonder how people were notified before text messages?
This news should be handled in person.
CNN showing reaction videos. Half of them seem to be families railing against the media swarming around them as they exit the meeting. CNN makes no mention of this.
Just says "they're upset"
CNN showing reaction videos. Half of them seem to be families railing against the media swarming around them as they exit the meeting. CNN makes no mention of this.
Just says "they're upset"
Can someone explain in layman's terms how/why Immarsat managed to narrow it down to two possible corridors based off pings?
might be something similar to Flight 961
So that was the object seen on all satellites photos then? It has the same dark spot in the middle...
Imagine if in fact they are searching in the wrong location.
Kind of sad when, as an American, the first place I check for news is the BBC site. It just feels much less sensationalist and tabloid-like.CNN is fucking terrible.
While I think it probably crashed (no tinfoil hat), they are basically just saying it did with no actual physical proof. No wreckage, no motive or reasons for plain to be where it was last.
So that is it? I would guess family members would want some more info.
Can someone explain in layman's terms how/why Immarsat managed to narrow it down to two possible corridors based off pings?
The data is proof.
Can someone explain in layman's terms how/why Immarsat managed to narrow it down to two possible corridors based off pings?
But I mean what were they telling themselves? That someone hijacked the plane and landed it somewhere?
Sadly, I just couldn't see a realistic scenario after 2-3 days where things ended happily.
While I think it probably crashed (no tinfoil hat), they are basically just saying it did with no actual physical proof. No wreckage, no motive or reasons for plain to be where it was last.
So that is it? I would guess family members would want some more info.
I'm not an expert but I think they got the two corridors by examining the duration it took for the signal to get to the satellite from the plane. Using that you can receive an estimate of the distance, a radius of where the plane could have been. When you compare this data with the amount of fuel on the plane you get the two corridors.
Regarding how they pinpointed the exact position, they probably used the Doppler effect on the signal created by the rotation of the Earth. The Earth rotates from the east to the west, right? So the plane was dragged away from the satellite, 'stretching' the signal wave a bit. I guess by using complex analysis of the signal with data about the speed of the Earth's rotation they managed to substantially narrow down the area where the plane last transmitted.
They likely won't have a plane for years, if ever. There's room to question their methods, but what makes you think the numbers are shady? Numbers are all they would ever have to go on.So uh wait. This is what is doing rounds in the news? They actually have no plane. Find the goddamn plane before you make such announcements based of some shady numbers.
Can you imagine what kind of reaction they would get if their conclusion turned out to be incorrect? These 'shady numbers' have been carefully verified, over many days. They wouldn't make such an announcement unless they were 100% sure. There was no obligation to make this statement prematurely - the search could have continued as normal without a conclusive statement for many more days.So uh wait. This is what is doing rounds in the news? They actually have no plane. Find the goddamn plane before you make such announcements based of some shady numbers.
So how much money is this going to cost the airline company?
With no info on cause of crash that opens up possibilities of airline error (something dangerous stored in the cargo hold, some mechanical problem that was missed, employees actually involved in deliberate flight path change, etc).
They are offering up nothing so aren't they going to get sued like crazy by family members of the victims?
They haven't even found it yet. I don't understand what you're saying.
They said it crashed in the ocean. That is their own words. They are 100% sure.
Why would people have to wait for legal action?
So glad it wasn't me on that plane. Went to Malaysia in January this year. Malaysian PM are so fail. How do you declare something when you have no proof? Just like the hijacking. Idiots.
I highly doubt this plane crashed, I think it landed somewhere.
This is getting weird now. Are we really going to split into camps of "find the damn pieces or else cannot declare it has crashed"?So glad it wasn't me on that plane. Went to Malaysia in January this year. Malaysian PM are so fail. How do you declare something when you have no proof? Just like the hijacking. Idiots.
I highly doubt this plane crashed, I think it landed somewhere.
So glad it wasn't me on that plane. Went to Malaysia in January this year. Malaysian PM are so fail. How do you declare something when you have no proof? Just like the hijacking. Idiots.
I highly doubt this plane crashed, I think it landed somewhere.
They haven't even found it yet. What could you sue them for that doesn't have to wait for an investigation into what happened?
Did some people really think they would be alive at this point?
Your family member boarded a flight headed to China, the plane ended up crashing in the the Indian ocean (way off course). This is what the airline is saying without having any wreckage or reasons for said crash.
Why would you have to wait for years (if ever) for something to be found before you take legal action?
Who are you suing and for what reason? Boeing? The airline? Why?
Your family member boarded a flight headed to China, the plane ended up crashing in the the Indian ocean (way off course). This is what the airline is saying without having any wreckage or reasons for said crash.
Why would you have to wait for years (if ever) for something to be found before you take legal action?
They said it crashed in the ocean. That is their own words. They are 100% sure.
Why would people have to wait for legal action?
I'm not an expert but I think they got the two corridors by examining the duration it took for the signal to get to the satellite from the plane. Using that you can receive an estimate of the distance, a radius of where the plane could have been. When you compare this data with the amount of fuel on the plane you get the two corridors.
Regarding how they pinpointed the exact position, they probably used the Doppler effect on the signal created by the rotation of the Earth. The Earth rotates from the east to the west, right? So the plane was dragged away from the satellite, 'stretching' the signal wave a bit. I guess by using complex analysis of the signal with data about the speed of the Earth's rotation they managed to substantially narrow down the area where the plane last transmitted.
That was my question. I will see if someone else can answer that.