You can offer evidence that the airline said your family members died in a place they weren't supposed to be.
Isn't that negligence?
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 ended in the Southern Indian Ocean
- Thread starter Oersted
- Start date
- Status
You can offer evidence that the airline said your family members died in a place they weren't supposed to be.
Isn't that negligence?
Necessarily? Of course not.
If it takes 2 weeks to perform that then they really need to upgrade their computer systems or something
Oh ok. You should tell them.
Mengy
wishes it were bannable to say mean things about Marvel
I am 99% certain you are wrong. Just because you don't understand the data and question it does not make the reality of it any less true.
We can now say with almost complete certainty that flight 370 went down in the Indian Ocean hundreds of miles SW of Perth. Sure we don't have any wreckage yet, but the data tracks are unfortunately conclusive. The real question that now needs to be answered is how in the hell did it fly so far off course and out into the middle of nowhere?
It infuriates me how much time they spent fucking around looking for it around Malaysia. Not to mention the arseholes who claimed they saw it crash near Vietnam. Perhaps if there weren't these false reports it might have meant the search area widened and they found the plane faster.
Boy Wander
Member
Even if they find the voice recorders, we might never know the full picture of what happened. The voice recorder will only keep the last two hours of data. So if a load of trouble hit shortly after take off, none of that voice data will be available.
Betta Lines
Member
According to Inmarsat's new analysis:
"the plane was flying at cruising height, above 30,000ft. They found no evidence of fluctuating heights being reported."
Chris Goodfellow's analysis from ages ago:
"Reports of altitude fluctuations. Well given that this was not transponder generated data but primary radar at maybe 200 miles the azimuth readings can be affected by a lot of atmospherics and I would not have high confidence in this being totally reliable."
So again, the simple explanation continues to be the most valid.
"the plane was flying at cruising height, above 30,000ft. They found no evidence of fluctuating heights being reported."
Chris Goodfellow's analysis from ages ago:
"Reports of altitude fluctuations. Well given that this was not transponder generated data but primary radar at maybe 200 miles the azimuth readings can be affected by a lot of atmospherics and I would not have high confidence in this being totally reliable."
So again, the simple explanation continues to be the most valid.
demigod
Member
Which analysis? The ones where multiple countries said they found debris but came up nothing? So tell me, WHERE IS THE PLANE? I won't believe it crashed until there's evidence.
Multiple countries have spotted objects out at sea. They even showed us the pictures. Discovering that debris is not related to the crash contradicts what analysis, exactly?
The Inmarsat's new analysis.
Even though I regret what has happened, I honestly just don't believe the plane had the fuel to go the distance where the debris are claimed to have been found.
An interesting post, not personally suggesting this , but a worthy read nonetheless.
http://fahaddalvi.wordpress.com/2014/03/24/fate-of-mh370-a-government-conspiracy/
Bottom line is all are dead. Whether the plane crashed, or the air force crashed it.
An interesting post, not personally suggesting this , but a worthy read nonetheless.
http://fahaddalvi.wordpress.com/2014/03/24/fate-of-mh370-a-government-conspiracy/
Bottom line is all are dead. Whether the plane crashed, or the air force crashed it.
Boy Wander
Member
The satellite data carried out by one of the world's leader in this area. The collaboration of this company with the UK aircrash investigation team. The corroboration of the analysis by other leading scientists in this field. The data shows the whereabouts of the plane the last time it was pinged by the satellite. This, in conjunction with the amount of fuel on board the plane at the time that the last ping was received can only mean that the plane crashed into the sea.
Boy Wander
Member
Even though I regret what has happened, I honestly just don't believe the plane had the fuel to go the distance where the debris are claimed to have been found.
An interesting post, not personally suggesting this , but a worthy read nonetheless.
http://fahaddalvi.wordpress.com/2014/03/24/fate-of-mh370-a-government-conspiracy/
Bottom line is all are dead. Whether the plane crashed, or the air force crashed it.
What a load of utter garbage.
The plane may never be found. They have solid data that shows it went down. You're just gonna be a conspiracy theorist forever then?
Aquamarine
Member
Even though I regret what has happened, I honestly just don't believe the plane had the fuel to go the distance where the debris are claimed to have been found.
An interesting post, not personally suggesting this , but a worthy read nonetheless.
http://fahaddalvi.wordpress.com/2014/03/24/fate-of-mh370-a-government-conspiracy/
Bottom line is all are dead. Whether the plane crashed, or the air force crashed it.
A USA government conspiracy? The Air Force crashed it? I...what...no. Just stop.
Even though I regret what has happened, I honestly just don't believe the plane had the fuel to go the distance where the debris are claimed to have been found.
An interesting post, not personally suggesting this , but a worthy read nonetheless.
http://fahaddalvi.wordpress.com/2014/03/24/fate-of-mh370-a-government-conspiracy/
Bottom line is all are dead. Whether the plane crashed, or the air force crashed it.
The amount of fuel on board and range of the aircraft is not a matter of belief.
If anything is to be found, it will probably be in a year or so when some small scraps of debris wash up on a beach somewhere and someone figures out it's from the plane or passengers. Other than that, I'd imagine most pieces large enough to be identified via satellite would have probably sunk into the ocean.
They have proof that the last ping puts it in the middle of the ocean; iirc it would've been able to fly for 30 more minutes after the last ping. Therefore, it could not possibly have reached land and obviously crashed somewhere in the ocean
Correct.
It sucks. They're probably regretting that they let the media run all over the field with this one. Because all they have is a location and the fact of a disappearance. Normally people wouldn't jump to conclusions but War on terror and muslims and Asia and transient black holes. And now no real closure, just admitting that they've reach a dead end. Just makes it worse for the families involved.
So how much fuel did it leave with and what was the aircraft's range given its speed and altitude?
Fjolle
Member
The fact that he was right about the altitude doesn't make anything about the rest of his story more or less correct.
I hope they found something, even a little debris, if not expect lots of series on the "History" channel about how ancient aliens abducted the plane.
Even though I regret what has happened, I honestly just don't believe the plane had the fuel to go the distance where the debris are claimed to have been found.
An interesting post, not personally suggesting this , but a worthy read nonetheless.
http://fahaddalvi.wordpress.com/2014/03/24/fate-of-mh370-a-government-conspiracy/
Bottom line is all are dead. Whether the plane crashed, or the air force crashed it.
scsa
Junior Member
(Today, 11:04 AM)
Uh...ok.
That may change as more data comes to light (specifically black box, but good luck finding -that-), but currently, that sounds about right.
In theory, the passengers could sue for a Breach of Contract, however, relatives cannot inherit the right to sue for them.
Kind of a complicated Law, but there IS a workaround available.
That's what insurance is for
Breach of contract? They aren't liable for not getting you there if a manufacturing defect crashes the plane.
Partial Gamification
Banned
Doesn't the black box's power run out in two weeks and after that it could be extremely hard to find if the plane is not located by then?
Yes but they did find the Air France one after two years. Different circumstances but still can be located.
"US shot down the plane and this is a massive coverup by their Zionist British allies in the AAIB"
Is that the answer you were looking for?
Even though I regret what has happened, I honestly just don't believe the plane had the fuel to go the distance where the debris are claimed to have been found.
An interesting post, not personally suggesting this , but a worthy read nonetheless.
http://fahaddalvi.wordpress.com/2014/03/24/fate-of-mh370-a-government-conspiracy/
Bottom line is all are dead. Whether the plane crashed, or the air force crashed it.
One of the people quoted in that stupid blog is Noel o Gara. He's a complete crank. He see's conspiracies in his morning Rice Krispies.
National Post:
So nothing about the plane crashing and ending up in a million pieces? No indication of trauma to the plane? How did they come to the conclusion that everybody died? It's still possible that it "crash landed" in the ocean, especially since it flew for 7 hours.
So nothing about the plane crashing and ending up in a million pieces? No indication of trauma to the plane? How did they come to the conclusion that everybody died? It's still possible that it "crash landed" in the ocean, especially since it flew for 7 hours.
I didn't consider that. But I was referring to the insinuation that the people were dead "because the plane slammed into the ocean"
And wouldn't there be food and water on the plane anyway? Not to last for a year obviously, but enough for a few weeks maybe.
They aren't going to stop looking. How is that conceding?
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked