The man who actually constructed the bombs that Jemaah Islamiah used in the Bali attacks was Malaysian.
Part if me (the cynical part) is a little wary of them having the simulator. With as much as we don't know about what happened, it's real easy for someone to put whatever they want on that machine to make it look like the pilot went rogue or was the cause of the incident (even if he wasn't) if they wanted.
Watching videos on his YT channel and getting some insight into his unfiltered personality, I find it really hard to believe he would be responsible for making a jet disappear like this, even for nefarious purposes.
Of course I am certainly no expert, so what do I know.
Seriously? In which "normal" circumstances would a pilot want his plane to basically become invisible? Maybe I'm missing something, but it makes no sense to have a "switch off" option for these things.
Fair enough, but primary radars don't cover the whole airspace. I juts don't get why important communication systems should be turned off that easily.
The man who actually constructed the bombs that Jemaah Islamiah used in the Bali attacks was Malaysian.
I'm sure they want to make sure they have the right information before leaking it out to the public. It looks incompetent if they announce something and then later change their mind.
Seems both the mastermind Noordin Mohammad Top and the mastermind behind other bombings Azahari bin Husin were Malaysian so it's not beyond the bounds of possibility that Malaysian extremists are involved. 38 Malaysians on board and 7 Indonesians. Would be interested to know about the backgrounds of those people. If Malaysians were involved I imagine it would be very difficult for the Malaysian government.
There's 239 people on board... and its probably flying over country side or in mountainous regions. I don't see why you have to shoot it down unless it was going to cause more civilian deaths. If the terrorist demanded he wanted free passage somewhere, China could have escorted the plane there.
That's why it would be better to have the pilot and co-pilot as the hijackers. Everything will be calm because no one would suspect a thing.China wont negociation with terrorist.
In 2012 a couple separatists tried to hijack a plane inside china (6 people) they all got stop and brought down by the business class passengers.
Those passengers were all hard core mofos, used barehands to fight the hijackers with knifes.
http://www.businessinsider.com/china-hijacking-reward-2012-7
Read the detail of that hijack attampt.
I wonld argue its not possible to openly hijack a plane after 911. If you can secretly get into the pilot's space you may still hijack it, but by and large its not possible to hijack a plane with 200 passenger no matter what weapon you have. People are not going to give a fuck if you hold some one as hostage. They will still rush and overwhelm the hijackers.
But I do agree the information that we will get from it will be helpful, especially if he has past records from the simulator show similar flight tracks...which I don't know why officials haven't said if there is or not, but just keep everyone speculating. Some incompetence.
TheAge said:Badat told the court last week that he believed the Malaysians, including the pilot, were "ready to perform an act".
During the meeting, the possibility was raised that the cockpit door might be locked. Badat told the court: "So I said, 'How about I give you one of my bombs to open a cockpit door?'?"
China wont negociation with terrorist.
In 2012 a couple separatists tried to hijack a plane inside china (6 people) they all got stop and brought down by the business class passengers.
Those passengers were all hard core mofos, used barehands to fight the hijackers with knifes.
http://www.businessinsider.com/china-hijacking-reward-2012-7
Read the detail of that hijack attampt.
I wonld argue its not possible to openly hijack a plane after 911. If you can secretly get into the pilot's space you may still hijack it, but by and large its not possible to hijack a plane with 200 passenger no matter what weapon you have. People are not going to give a fuck if you hold some one as hostage. They will still rush and overwhelm the hijackers.
That's why it would be better to have the pilot and co-pilot as the hijackers. Everything will be calm because no one would suspect a thing.
That really depends on the situation and who's on board and what weapons they have. Lets say they have a bunch of knifes... we all know what happened at Kunming, and if you don't think you can win you stay put. It really depends. I wonder what type of answer you would get if you polled GAF.
Clearly he's orchestrating the whole thingyeah i read that again last night and he wasn't far off
EDIT: this...
777crash confirms jihadists turning to make trouble for China. Chance for US to make common cause, befriend China while Russia bullies.
Seems both the mastermind Noordin Mohammad Top and the mastermind behind other bombings Azahari bin Husin were Malaysian so it's not beyond the bounds of possibility that Malaysian extremists are involved. 38 Malaysians on board and 7 Indonesians. Would be interested to know about the backgrounds of those people. If Malaysians were involved I imagine it would be very difficult for the Malaysian government.
Flimsy article at best and scaremongoring Australians yet again, not surprised its from The Age. I mean the above quote doesn't even make sense - why blow the cockpit door when the pilot was 'ready to act'...
And there's a massive urge by western media trying to associate any terrorist act with Muslims in general. As Falk said the term they should be using is extremist or radical. All ethnic Malays are Muslims so they are putting all Malays under the same umbrella. The way the article opens - "Evidence of a plot by Malaysian Islamists to hijack a passenger jet...." is just wrong. *sigh*
Is there a chance it will never be discovered and you will never know what happened to it? It's gotta be high at this point
Becoming suspects just because they're Malaysians and Indonesians.
As an Indonesian, the way you phrase this post kind of tick me off, but eh, whatever.
Damn.
Becoming suspects just because they're Malaysians and Indonesians.
As an Indonesian, the way you phrase this post kind of tick me off, but eh, whatever.
I agree that it seems more likely, but it's still difficult to make sense of the events. The co-pilot would have had to incapacitate the captain if the plane flew for 7 hours. I can't imagine the door being locked keeping captain and the crew out for that long and the captain could possible have means of communicating with the outside world even being locked out of the cockpit. If he did manage to incapacitate the captain, did the crew really not notice anything during those 7 hours? I suppose after a certain point it would have been too late to save the plane, but perhaps not too late to re-establish contact with the world. It is very difficult to neatly fit the [assumed] facts into any plausible theory.I'm sure Egypt Air Flight 990 which was an obvious suicide/murder by the co-pilot has already been mentioned. But I can't help but feel this is similar. It's easy to lock people out of the cabin. It's happened by accident before and on purpose (Ethiopia Airlines Flight ET702). For me this seems more likely than hijacking. But it's still speculation. We may never know.
That's not a motive to hijack a plane carrying mostly Chinese nationals and then, presumably, crash it into an ocean.USA TODAY has learned that the pilot of the missing Malaysian Airlines Flight MH370 had close ties with a Malaysian opposition leader who recently was sentenced to prison on a sodomy charge. Just hours before the flight, the pilot, Zaharie Ahmad Shah, attended a court hearing in the case.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...-flight-missing-pilots/6484249/?csp=fbfanpage
USA TODAY has learned that the pilot of the missing Malaysian Airlines Flight MH370 had close ties with a Malaysian opposition leader who recently was sentenced to prison on a sodomy charge. Just hours before the flight, the pilot, Zaharie Ahmad Shah, attended a court hearing in the case.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...-flight-missing-pilots/6484249/?csp=fbfanpage
Yeah, a lot still makes little sense. That said one man nearly succeded in killing 3 men and take control of a plane Federal Express Flight 705I agree that it seems more likely, but it's still difficult to make sense of the events. The co-pilot would have had to incapacitate the captain if the plane flew for 7 hours. I can't imagine the door being locked keeping captain and the crew out for that long and the captain could possible have means of communicating with the outside world even being locked out of the cockpit. If he did manage to incapacitate the captain, did the crew really not notice anything during those 7 hours? I suppose after a certain point it would have been too late to save the plane, but perhaps not too late to re-establish contact with the world. It is very difficult to neatly fit the [assumed] facts into any plausible theory.
I don't know. This, the simulator, it all feels circumstantial to me.USA TODAY has learned that the pilot of the missing Malaysian Airlines Flight MH370 had close ties with a Malaysian opposition leader who recently was sentenced to prison on a sodomy charge. Just hours before the flight, the pilot, Zaharie Ahmad Shah, attended a court hearing in the case.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...-flight-missing-pilots/6484249/?csp=fbfanpage
Are you suggesting the plane is now inside the flight simulator? I guess it's not less plausible than the kidney theory.
Holy hell. Not sure how to feel about this. Sounds like a nice coincidence.
USA TODAY has learned that the pilot of the missing Malaysian Airlines Flight MH370 had close ties with a Malaysian opposition leader who recently was sentenced to prison on a sodomy charge. Just hours before the flight, the pilot, Zaharie Ahmad Shah, attended a court hearing in the case.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...-flight-missing-pilots/6484249/?csp=fbfanpage
The guy has ties to Malaysian Opposition leader - not sure of the logic of leaping from that to him annonymously and without public declaration wanting to crash a plane of mostly Chinese nationals.
It's a plane and airline owned by the Malaysian government.
Seems odd that the intention wouldn't be just to crash it into some government building then, sending a very public message.It's a plane and airline owned by the Malaysian government.
Whats going on with this plane has to do with the cyber war going on with China and Russia. 20 of the people on the flight worked for a company called Freescale Semiconductor. They were chinese nationals contracted by the U.S. to work on tech systems. Either it was destroyed by a missile or they were kidnapped.
Someone on my Facebook just posted this:
GAF?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anwar_Ibrahim
He's controversial but I don't see any ties to violence of any kind.
Someone on my Facebook just posted this:
GAF?
Yeah I read some of that nonsense, including the "cloaking device" that was supposedly triggered.
david copperfield made a plane disappearYeah I read some of that nonsense, including the "cloaking device" that was supposedly triggered.