• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 ended in the Southern Indian Ocean

Status
Not open for further replies.

StayDead

Member
Is it not possible for the plane to have flown and landed in North Korea?

It'd certainly give reason behind there being no phone signal had it have landed safely
 

SpyGuy239

Member
Part if me (the cynical part) is a little wary of them having the simulator. With as much as we don't know about what happened, it's real easy for someone to put whatever they want on that machine to make it look like the pilot went rogue or was the cause of the incident (even if he wasn't) if they wanted.

Watching videos on his YT channel and getting some insight into his unfiltered personality, I find it really hard to believe he would be responsible for making a jet disappear like this, even for nefarious purposes.

Of course I am certainly no expert, so what do I know.

Having a flight simulator doesn't condemn anyone of anything. I know lots of people who have actual slight simulator set ups at home.

But I do agree the information that we will get from it will be helpful, especially if he has past records from the simulator show similar flight tracks...which I don't know why officials haven't said if there is or not, but just keep everyone speculating. Some incompetence.
 

seanoff

Member
Seriously? In which "normal" circumstances would a pilot want his plane to basically become invisible? Maybe I'm missing something, but it makes no sense to have a "switch off" option for these things.



Fair enough, but primary radars don't cover the whole airspace. I juts don't get why important communication systems should be turned off that easily.

Transponders have been known to fail, fo rouge etc like everything else. You may need to turn them off.
 
I'm sure they want to make sure they have the right information before leaking it out to the public. It looks incompetent if they announce something and then later change their mind.
 
The man who actually constructed the bombs that Jemaah Islamiah used in the Bali attacks was Malaysian.

Seems both the mastermind Noordin Mohammad Top and the mastermind behind other bombings Azahari bin Husin were Malaysian so it's not beyond the bounds of possibility that Malaysian extremists are involved. 38 Malaysians on board and 7 Indonesians. Would be interested to know about the backgrounds of those people. If Malaysians were involved I imagine it would be very difficult for the Malaysian government.
 
I'm sure they want to make sure they have the right information before leaking it out to the public. It looks incompetent if they announce something and then later change their mind.

That's the reason.

EDIT: The fact that the one who constructed the bombs for the bali attacks was Malaysian was a surprise to many. While we do have people holding extreme viewpoints here (hell, every country has a few) they are a few and between.

I hope it isn't a terrorist plot, and I don't think it's one too.
 

Falk

that puzzling face
Seems both the mastermind Noordin Mohammad Top and the mastermind behind other bombings Azahari bin Husin were Malaysian so it's not beyond the bounds of possibility that Malaysian extremists are involved. 38 Malaysians on board and 7 Indonesians. Would be interested to know about the backgrounds of those people. If Malaysians were involved I imagine it would be very difficult for the Malaysian government.

¯\(°_o)/¯ I give up.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-15vQNFFu6wA/Ux0K-OKC1RI/AAAAAAAAMCE/VWrJfuL2y3k/s1600/passengerlistmas.jpg

Malaysian passenger and cabin crew manifest. Again, not to be racist, but it is very rare comparatively for non-Malays to be Muslims in Malaysia (e.g. all the Chinese names on this manifest), in the sense that it'd be something their families would gossip about hence it'd stick out like a beacon in any investigation.

Also I'm going to reiterate that even that aside, being Muslim isn't a damning factor in the least, especially in Malaysia of all places. Sure, proper investigation into backgrounds of everyone would need to be done but trust me in saying extremist tendencies is something that is so rare that it would be noticed by people around that specific person.
 

Batigol

Banned
Is there a chance it will never be discovered and you will never know what happened to it? It's gotta be high at this point
 

tino

Banned
There's 239 people on board... and its probably flying over country side or in mountainous regions. I don't see why you have to shoot it down unless it was going to cause more civilian deaths. If the terrorist demanded he wanted free passage somewhere, China could have escorted the plane there.

China wont negociation with terrorist.

In 2012 a couple separatists tried to hijack a plane inside china (6 people) they all got stop and brought down by the business class passengers.

Those passengers were all hard core mofos, used barehands to fight the hijackers with knifes.

http://www.businessinsider.com/china-hijacking-reward-2012-7

Read the detail of that hijack attampt.

I wonld argue its not possible to openly hijack a plane after 911. If you can secretly get into the pilot's space you may still hijack it, but by and large its not possible to hijack a plane with 200 passenger no matter what weapon you have. People are not going to give a fuck if you hold some one as hostage. They will still rush and overwhelm the hijackers.
 

Ovid

Member
China wont negociation with terrorist.

In 2012 a couple separatists tried to hijack a plane inside china (6 people) they all got stop and brought down by the business class passengers.

Those passengers were all hard core mofos, used barehands to fight the hijackers with knifes.

http://www.businessinsider.com/china-hijacking-reward-2012-7

Read the detail of that hijack attampt.

I wonld argue its not possible to openly hijack a plane after 911. If you can secretly get into the pilot's space you may still hijack it, but by and large its not possible to hijack a plane with 200 passenger no matter what weapon you have. People are not going to give a fuck if you hold some one as hostage. They will still rush and overwhelm the hijackers.
That's why it would be better to have the pilot and co-pilot as the hijackers. Everything will be calm because no one would suspect a thing.

Not saying that happened in this case.
 
But I do agree the information that we will get from it will be helpful, especially if he has past records from the simulator show similar flight tracks...which I don't know why officials haven't said if there is or not, but just keep everyone speculating. Some incompetence.

It actually sounds like they're trying to conduct a responsible investigation. The media and the public does not have a right to demand this information be released as soon as it's discovered, nor should they expect it to be.
 

Jimrpg

Member

TheAge said:
Badat told the court last week that he believed the Malaysians, including the pilot, were "ready to perform an act".
During the meeting, the possibility was raised that the cockpit door might be locked. Badat told the court: "So I said, 'How about I give you one of my bombs to open a cockpit door?'?"

Flimsy article at best and scaremongoring Australians yet again, not surprised its from The Age. I mean the above quote doesn't even make sense - why blow the cockpit door when the pilot was 'ready to act'...

And there's a massive urge by western media trying to associate any terrorist act with Muslims in general. As Falk said the term they should be using is extremist or radical. All ethnic Malays are Muslims so they are putting all Malays under the same umbrella. The way the article opens - "Evidence of a plot by Malaysian Islamists to hijack a passenger jet...." is just wrong. *sigh*
 

Jimrpg

Member
China wont negociation with terrorist.

In 2012 a couple separatists tried to hijack a plane inside china (6 people) they all got stop and brought down by the business class passengers.

Those passengers were all hard core mofos, used barehands to fight the hijackers with knifes.

http://www.businessinsider.com/china-hijacking-reward-2012-7

Read the detail of that hijack attampt.

I wonld argue its not possible to openly hijack a plane after 911. If you can secretly get into the pilot's space you may still hijack it, but by and large its not possible to hijack a plane with 200 passenger no matter what weapon you have. People are not going to give a fuck if you hold some one as hostage. They will still rush and overwhelm the hijackers.

That really depends on the situation and who's on board and what weapons they have. Lets say they have a bunch of knifes... we all know what happened at Kunming, and if you don't think you can win you stay put. It really depends. I wonder what type of answer you would get if you polled GAF.
 

Jimrpg

Member
That's why it would be better to have the pilot and co-pilot as the hijackers. Everything will be calm because no one would suspect a thing.

I think the pilot is in on it... he flew the perfect flight... I don't know how hard that is, but if someone could do it, it would be him. He's had a lot of flight hours.
 
God, some of these theories are sounding like bad episodes of 24.

I really hope that when it's said and done, this plane was not a deliberate hijacking. Knowing that a jet has disappeared on radar is the scariest thing to this story.
 

tino

Banned
That really depends on the situation and who's on board and what weapons they have. Lets say they have a bunch of knifes... we all know what happened at Kunming, and if you don't think you can win you stay put. It really depends. I wonder what type of answer you would get if you polled GAF.

The difference are in the train station, everyone is running away from the attackers (who have really large knifes.) On a plane you know you are not going to live if the hijackers have control of the plane. There is no point to not rush the hijackers.

Plus on a plane there is no space to use a cold weapon effectively. Anywhere you stand some passenger can be sitting next to you and can pull your arms and legs.
 
If the pilot did it, why didn't the co-pilot intervene? This suggests that the co-pilot was in on it too, or that the pilot managed to swiftly take out the co-pilot somehow. Any ideas on if/how that could have happened?

The only way I can think of where this happens while both pilots are conscious is that they are being threatened by someone else.

Also I wonder what it must have been like for the rest of the crew. The flight attendants must have immediately picked up on the plane diverting from its intended path, trying to contact the pilot for explanations, to no avail...
 

Dryk

Member
I just remembered that Malaysia Airlines flights let you watch the flight-path in real time on the screens in the back of the chairs. Passengers would've realised something was up very quickly.

Re: Flipping a switch to turn the transponder off. If you ever need to turn it off due to malfunction etc you don't want to have to go and physically disconnect it somewhere. In the grand scheme it's far more risky to not have a switch.

yeah i read that again last night and he wasn't far off

EDIT: this...

777crash confirms jihadists turning to make trouble for China. Chance for US to make common cause, befriend China while Russia bullies.
Clearly he's orchestrating the whole thing
92606585_128.jpg
 

Laughing Banana

Weeping Pickle
Seems both the mastermind Noordin Mohammad Top and the mastermind behind other bombings Azahari bin Husin were Malaysian so it's not beyond the bounds of possibility that Malaysian extremists are involved. 38 Malaysians on board and 7 Indonesians. Would be interested to know about the backgrounds of those people. If Malaysians were involved I imagine it would be very difficult for the Malaysian government.

Damn.

Becoming suspects just because they're Malaysians and Indonesians.

As an Indonesian, the way you phrase this post kind of tick me off, but eh, whatever.
 
Flimsy article at best and scaremongoring Australians yet again, not surprised its from The Age. I mean the above quote doesn't even make sense - why blow the cockpit door when the pilot was 'ready to act'...

And there's a massive urge by western media trying to associate any terrorist act with Muslims in general. As Falk said the term they should be using is extremist or radical. All ethnic Malays are Muslims so they are putting all Malays under the same umbrella. The way the article opens - "Evidence of a plot by Malaysian Islamists to hijack a passenger jet...." is just wrong. *sigh*

The pilot they are referring to is part of the Malaysian terror cell who would over power or kill the airline pilot flying the plane. Not sure what is so wrong about the title, given they are both Malaysian and Islamists. Extremist is pretty vague, German far right extremists? Indian Hindu extremists?

I don't think it's an urge by the media to associate any terrorist act with Muslims in general, there is very good reason to investigate any links with Islamic fundamentalists given what's happened in the past, especially 9/11 and the bombings plotted by Malaysian Islamic extremists.
 

ElyrionX

Member
Is it incorrect to believe that they took a really long time to find out something as basic as the plane still flying for hours after contact was lost?
 

Enron

Banned
Becoming suspects just because they're Malaysians and Indonesians.

As an Indonesian, the way you phrase this post kind of tick me off, but eh, whatever.

Half-indonesian here, and that doesn't tick me off in the slightest. There are extremist indonesian muslims. One of my mom's childhood friends has a son that is one, and that dude is straight-up scary. He disappeared once for like two years and made all of us wonder wtf he was up to.
 
Damn.

Becoming suspects just because they're Malaysians and Indonesians.

As an Indonesian, the way you phrase this post kind of tick me off, but eh, whatever.

Given Badat said the cell was made up of Malaysians seems logical to check the Malaysians on board. We also know Malaysians and Indonesians worked together in Jemaah Islamiah, Abu Bakar Bashir lived in Malaysia for 17 years. If someone were to do it I'd imagine it would be JI. But you are right, could be any nationality or motivation at this point.
 
I'm sure Egypt Air Flight 990 which was an obvious suicide/murder by the co-pilot has already been mentioned. But I can't help but feel this is similar. It's easy to lock people out of the cabin. It's happened by accident before and on purpose (Ethiopia Airlines Flight ET702). For me this seems more likely than hijacking. But it's still speculation. We may never know.
 

syllogism

Member
I'm sure Egypt Air Flight 990 which was an obvious suicide/murder by the co-pilot has already been mentioned. But I can't help but feel this is similar. It's easy to lock people out of the cabin. It's happened by accident before and on purpose (Ethiopia Airlines Flight ET702). For me this seems more likely than hijacking. But it's still speculation. We may never know.
I agree that it seems more likely, but it's still difficult to make sense of the events. The co-pilot would have had to incapacitate the captain if the plane flew for 7 hours. I can't imagine the door being locked keeping captain and the crew out for that long and the captain could possible have means of communicating with the outside world even being locked out of the cockpit. If he did manage to incapacitate the captain, did the crew really not notice anything during those 7 hours? I suppose after a certain point it would have been too late to save the plane, but perhaps not too late to re-establish contact with the world. It is very difficult to neatly fit the [assumed] facts into any plausible theory.
 

syllogism

Member
USA TODAY has learned that the pilot of the missing Malaysian Airlines Flight MH370 had close ties with a Malaysian opposition leader who recently was sentenced to prison on a sodomy charge. Just hours before the flight, the pilot, Zaharie Ahmad Shah, attended a court hearing in the case.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...-flight-missing-pilots/6484249/?csp=fbfanpage
That's not a motive to hijack a plane carrying mostly Chinese nationals and then, presumably, crash it into an ocean.
 
I agree that it seems more likely, but it's still difficult to make sense of the events. The co-pilot would have had to incapacitate the captain if the plane flew for 7 hours. I can't imagine the door being locked keeping captain and the crew out for that long and the captain could possible have means of communicating with the outside world even being locked out of the cockpit. If he did manage to incapacitate the captain, did the crew really not notice anything during those 7 hours? I suppose after a certain point it would have been too late to save the plane, but perhaps not too late to re-establish contact with the world. It is very difficult to neatly fit the [assumed] facts into any plausible theory.
Yeah, a lot still makes little sense. That said one man nearly succeded in killing 3 men and take control of a plane Federal Express Flight 705
But really there is no way of knowing at the moment. I don't see hijackers simply crashing into the sea. Nor do I see the pilots fighting the hijackers as it's far too risky as it could easily lead to a plane crash. Nor was it mechanical failiure. Such systems don't just "fail".
That said why fly for hours if you intend to kill yourself? Doesn't make sense. That would suggest a hijacking. Truly a mystery.
 
USA TODAY has learned that the pilot of the missing Malaysian Airlines Flight MH370 had close ties with a Malaysian opposition leader who recently was sentenced to prison on a sodomy charge. Just hours before the flight, the pilot, Zaharie Ahmad Shah, attended a court hearing in the case.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...-flight-missing-pilots/6484249/?csp=fbfanpage
I don't know. This, the simulator, it all feels circumstantial to me.

Now admittedly I don't know anything about the pilot, but from descriptions in the news he seems like...a nice guy. 30 years experience, a couple kids, community service, and the erratic series of actions that happened on this plane...just seems out of character.
 

Stronty

Member
Are you suggesting the plane is now inside the flight simulator? I guess it's not less plausible than the kidney theory.

No, was just making a sarcastic comment, but your deduction of my intent sounds like a Twilight Zone episode or the plane flew into the Matrix. How could a plane be absorbed by a flight sim? Maybe a 'gamecube' from the TV show Reboot surrounded the plane taking it into a flight simulator or other game genre.
 

liquidtmd

Banned
The guy has ties to Malaysian Opposition leader - not sure of the logic of leaping from that to him annonymously and without public declaration wanting to crash a plane of mostly Chinese nationals.
 

numble

Member
The guy has ties to Malaysian Opposition leader - not sure of the logic of leaping from that to him annonymously and without public declaration wanting to crash a plane of mostly Chinese nationals.

It's a plane and airline owned by the Malaysian government.
 

liquidtmd

Banned
It's a plane and airline owned by the Malaysian government.

Sure - I understand the implications, as I stated though it's just I really would have expected a public declaration / statement from the guy if that was truly his underlying reasoning / endgame.

You can't be a martyr to a cause if no-one knows about the cause.
 

Daria

Member
Since there's now talk of the signals being sent while the plane was on the ground and communications being cut manually, there's not many scenarios now.

The pilot(s) cut communications, flew this plane for however many hours, either landed it on a remote island, a private hangar, or in an ocean*.

**Chances of that seem to be going down but still high.

But now how they hide a 777 with almost 300 people for a week without being detected at all? There's 25 countires searching for it and satellites looking at everything. This was either planned perfectly or this was just an one in a million accident which ended up shrouded in mystery.
 

Miggytronz

Member
Someone on my Facebook just posted this:

Whats going on with this plane has to do with the cyber war going on with China and Russia. 20 of the people on the flight worked for a company called Freescale Semiconductor. They were chinese nationals contracted by the U.S. to work on tech systems. Either it was destroyed by a missile or they were kidnapped.

GAF?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom