• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Man of Steel |OT| It's about action.

Raptor

Member
I absolutely love Watchmen, it's my favorite super hero movie, I even like it more than Avengers. But MoS had very little of what makes Watchmen (director's cut) a great movie. Seeing as how Snyder did both I was extremely optimistic for MoS, but he dropped the ball on several story points. Little details that make Watchmen DC awesome were glaringly missing from MoS, and it needed them badly.

I do love Watchmen too, but I think Snyder and probably Nolan wanted to make a point with MoS, they wanted to say "this ain't Donner's anymore" this is a new take "with" action.

Now that the origin and that is out of the way I guaranteed MoS 2 will be the best superhero movie of the history of the world.

Snyder needs badly a new editor though.
 

jett

D-Member
John Carter is most definitely a much better made movie than Man of Shitheel. It's not particularly great nor does it do anything interesting, but it's not a mess of shitty ideas and poor storytelling like Mass-murderer of Steel.
 
Even James Newton Howard's score for Snow White and the Huntsman was damned good.

He was also the biggest missing piece from TDKR, besides a decent script (I can't believe Goyer and co have gotten even worse in that dept).
 

Raptor

Member
John Carter is most definitely a much better made movie than Man of Shitheel. It's not particularly great nor does it do anything interesting, but it's not a mess of shitty ideas and poor storytelling like Mass-murderer of Steel.

You mean John Bomba is a better movie than Man of Bomba?

:(

lols.
 
John Carter is most definitely a much better made movie than Man of Shitheel. It's not particularly great nor does it do anything interesting, but it's not a mess of shitty ideas and poor storytelling like Mass-murderer of Steel.

While it's true that I've despised every movie that Snyder has made with the exception of Dawn of the Dead, Man of Steel being worse than John Carter would be a landmark achievement of bland, uninteresting mediocrity.

I didn't even think John Carter was TERRIBLE but I'd never watch it again
 

Matrix

LeBron loves his girlfriend. There is no other woman in the world he’d rather have. The problem is, Dwyane’s not a woman.
Plane scene "iconic" in Returns? lol overrated scene to this day that irks that shit out of me for various reasons. If it's free reign to blast MOS, then that Returns plane scene is gonna get some later from me today.

Cos-fucking-playing with Reeve/Kidder's legacy.
 

Raptor

Member
Even James Newton Howard's score for Snow White and the Huntsman was damned good.

He was also the biggest missing piece from TDKR, besides a decent script (I can't believe Goyer and co have gotten even worse in that dept).

He ascended to God Tier for me with his Lady in the Water OST.

Hell, Im listening to it right now on youtube lols.
 
Plane scene "iconic" in Returns? lol overrated scene to this day that irks that shit out of me for various reasons. If it's free reign to blast MOS, then that Returns plane scene is gonna get some later from me today.

Cos-fucking-playing with Reeve/Kidder's legacy.

Returns still remains the most beautiful looking superhero film around.
 

jett

D-Member
While it's true that I've despised every movie that Snyder has made with the exception of Dawn of the Dead, Man of Steel being worse than John Carter would be a landmark achievement of bland, uninteresting mediocrity.

I didn't even think John Carter was TERRIBLE but I'd never watch it again

MoS's failings are just that big, I guess. I did have a more entertaining time with JC but you're right in that it falls on the bland side.
 
He ascended to God Tier for me with his Lady in the Water OST.

Hell, Im listening to it right now on youtube lols.

The Village is my favorite of his work.

The quality of the Batman scores is compelling to me, considering that Howard and Zimmer collaborated. They're good scores, but when I heard that they were doing them together I was thinking they would be some next-level shit, like the cure for deafness or something.

MoS's failings are just that big, I guess. I did have a more entertaining time with JC but you're right in that it falls on the bland side.

Yeah, I'll have to see for myself I guess.
 

Matrix

LeBron loves his girlfriend. There is no other woman in the world he’d rather have. The problem is, Dwyane’s not a woman.
Returns still remains the most beautiful looking superhero film around.

I'm not even talking about that. That's great that it's pretty lol

I got to go to work :(
 

Symphonic

Member
Speaking of Zimmer-love, James Newton Howard remains the unsung hero of the Batman Begins score.

Even his soundtracks for Shyamalan's last three or four shit fests have been phenomenal. Howard don't give a fuck, he could score a tree growing and it would be incredible.

James Newton Howard is one of the best out there. Although he gets attached to a lot of bad movies (like The Last Airbender) he still makes absolutely amazing scores (like The Last Airbender).

Even James Newton Howard's score for Snow White and the Huntsman was damned good.

He was also the biggest missing piece from TDKR, besides a decent script (I can't believe Goyer and co have gotten even worse in that dept).

Oh my god there's more of you

I love you all
 

JB1981

Member
I haven't even seen this movie yet but the soundtrack makes me want to go like, today. I hate when people shit on a soundtrack because it's "epic," I mean yeah it's kind of an epic movie isn't it? I'm still finding some good themes and some very pleasing sounds overall. John Carter's score is also terrific but I don't see how that has anything to do with this, usually Giacchino is terrific so that goes without saying.

I'm not even the biggest Hans Zimmer fan but when he hits the right notes for me, no pun intended, I'm usually very impressed.

I grow tired of Zimmer's usual bombast but this score really works for me. I can listen to the whole OST almost all the way through and not grow tired of it. And there are some moments in this movie that Zimmer captures beautifully.

"Make a better world, Kal." - love that scene.
 

WillyFive

Member
Even James Newton Howard's score for Snow White and the Huntsman was damned good.

He was also the biggest missing piece from TDKR, besides a decent script (I can't believe Goyer and co have gotten even worse in that dept).

You got a point. TDKR's score was also forgettable; despite TDK having great parts like Joker's theme and Batman Begins having this one. It felt like it just reused music from the first two.

John Bomba deserved better. At least Clark Kent Begins will be getting a sequel.

Yeah. I was excited for a sequel after John Carter's ending (because it was a great ending), but I was just upset at MoS by the end.
 
I wish. I'm a Snyder defender. I had such high hopes for this movie. I feel so, so disappointed. This feels like I did last year with Prometheus. I can't believe how fucking badly they dropped the ball.

I don't even love Returns. It's got a good set of problems. It certainly isn't the Superman movie needed for the character these days. But fuck me, MoS felt like watching a studio melt money to that godawful techno-remix of If I were a rich man.

You're being way too harsh on MoS. Some of the flashbacks with young Clark were great. The sense of isolation you feel he's surrounding himself in as he gets older is strong. There are parts that touch on Clark Kent from Superman 2, but go deeper.

For instance, in Superman 2, Clark gets bullied at a bar and you see him stand up for what's right, but that's all you see. The way Cavill reacts at the bar has more emotional resonance than all of Returns.You feel his frustration and his childhood creep up on him, you think of his father's words, you think of his own personal beliefs and his search for his origin. It was just one of many scenes that added a few unfamiliar layers to a character that make complete sense.

Yes, the dialogue was a bit stilted at times, but I vastly preferred it to Nolan verbalizing every single feeling that his characters in the Batman films feel.

Then there's the supporting cast like Crowe and Costner who hit it out of the park, and Shannon who is clearly having a bit of fun hamming it up.

Once the action started, it didn't let up and it did go on for too long. They could have done with a couple of scenes aimed at character development after the Smallville fight.

Also, regarding Zod,
collatoral damage is one thing, but having control of stopping someone from burning a family right in front of you is another, especially if you've never killed a person before. We shouldn't take Clark's exasperation at that point for granted.
 
I grow tired of Zimmer's usual bombast but this score really works for me. I can listen to the whole OST almost all the way through and not grow tired of it. And there are some moments in this movie that Zimmer captures beautifully.

Oddly Zimmer's scores generally take a while to grow on me. The first time I heard Inception's I wasn't impressed at all, but over time I really started to appreciate it more, especially tracks like Old Souls which is just incredibly atmospheric and quite different from the norm.

Alternatively, his Man of Steel soundtrack won me over almost immediately. And I don't even have the context to consider yet either.
 

JB1981

Member
Yea Zod in this movie is a big improvement on Terrence Stamp in Superman II. Zod had no motivation in that movie other than tyrranical rule. He was a completely one-note villain. At least Goyer's Zod is a somewhat sympathetic character and we can see his plight. He has lost his world and is fulfilling his purpose as he was designed. He also has a much richer connection to Jor-El. Jor-El is also a big improvement and I found his relationship with Kal even more touching (and real) than Donner's Superman.
 

jett

D-Member
I also like the Zimmer's work on MoS. It's not what I expected(or what Zimmer himself said it was gonna be), but it's pretty nice.

Returns still remains the most beautiful looking superhero film around.

You sure like your orange tones, don't you. Returns is just dull to look at.

If only MoS held on to its shots for longer periods of time. Man. I remember a time when I thought MoS would be a gorgeous movie. Then again didn't know the entire movie was going to be drenched in blue.
 

jey_16

Banned
So much hate....I just got back from an advance screening here, thought it was pretty decent. After watching Superman Returns on the weekend, it felt like they went in the completely opposite direction.....maybe even too far? the first half of the film was great and even though I was glad they didn't spend too much time setting up his origin story, a part of me actually wanted to see more of it because it would have made the second half so much better because you form an emotional connection with the characters and care what happens instead of just being exhausted by the action. Smallville battle was great though. Loved Kevin Costner and Russell Crowe, wish we got too see more of them. Henry Cavill and Amy Adams were fine as well, no complaints on the casting.

I really hope this does well enough to ensure sequels and bring in other DC heroes, give me Worlds Finest in this universe and I will be ecstatic
 
I agree with Sculli about Returns, it's just beautiful and expertly crafted on a visual basis. It's a shame that the content didn't really live up to its visual elegance but it's damn nice to look at.
 

Raptor

Member
I agree with Sculli about Returns, it's just beautiful and expertly crafted on a visual basis. It's a shame that the content didn't really live up to its visual elegance but it's damn nice to look at.

Yeah is pretty, like looking at a Mountain vista, pretty but you can fall asleep looking at it.
 

JB1981

Member
I think Returns is a nice looking movie as well and has some gorgeous shots. I love the shot of Superman with the Krypton island above him and I love when he drinks in power from the Sun .. beautiful scenes. I don't hate Returns at all ... Man of Steel is just going for something entirely different and I think it succeeds at that.

It's a shame that it's virtually impossible to buy Returns on blu-ray right now.
 

Blader

Member
I'm not sure what people find so great looking about Returns. There are a couple nicely shot sequences, like the plane rescue or Supes chasing/lifting the car with Lex's lady in it (Kitty?), but I don't really see the same "most beautifully shot superhero movie ever" praise that others give it. I think the Dark Knight trilogy and both of Snyder's superhero films are much more remarkable looking.
 

Raptor

Member
I think Returns is a nice looking movie as well and has some gorgeous shots. I love the shot of Superman with the Krypton island above him and I love when he drinks in power from the Sun .. beautiful scenes. I don't hate Returns at all ... Man of Steel is just going for something entirely different and I think it succeeds at that.

It's a shame that it's virtually impossible to buy Returns on blu-ray right now.

There is a scene where he is descending in the Fortress, that is my favorite scene of that movie.

I don't hate it either I just think is up there with Blade 3 as one of the worse ComicBook movies I have ever seen, coincidentally both have Parker Posey :p

lols.
 

jett

D-Member
I'm not sure what people find so great looking about Returns. There are a couple nicely shot sequences, like the plane rescue or Supes chasing/lifting the car with Lex's lady in it (Kitty?), but I don't really see the same "most beautifully shot superhero movie ever" praise that others give it. I think the Dark Knight trilogy and both of Snyder's superhero films are much more remarkable looking.

I don't really understand it either. It's just Sculli saying that crap, to be honest, and others just deferring to his opinion. Returns is dull as fuck from every single conceivable point of view.
 
I'm not sure what people find so great looking about Returns.

d9rrui9.jpg


I don't really understand it either. It's just Sculli saying that crap, to be honest, and others just deferring to his opinion. Returns is dull as fuck from every single conceivable point of view.

Nope I thought it had great cinematography before I even knew this Sculli

And I certainly don't defer to his opinion, I think we agree about Speed Racer and Michael Giacchino and that's about it. :p
 
I'm not sure what people find so great looking about Returns. There are a couple nicely shot sequences, like the plane rescue or Supes chasing/lifting the car with Lex's lady in it (Kitty?), but I don't really see the same "most beautifully shot superhero movie ever" praise that others give it. I think the Dark Knight trilogy and both of Snyder's superhero films are much more remarkable looking.

There are scenes like the one Raptor mentions:

There is a scene where he is descending in the Fortress, that is my favorite scene of that movie.

There's the end shot of him flying up into the clouds and sun, then out into space. Though I hate the act itself, the shot of him lifting the Krypto-Island into space is lovely, as is the shot of him charging up into the sun right before that. Him and Lois flying around Metropolis is really nice, but that's more due to the wonderful piece of music that accompanies it.

It's just a really good looking movie. At least I think so, anyway.
 

WillyFive

Member
Yea Zod in this movie is a big improvement on Terrence Stamp in Superman II. Zod had no motivation in that movie other than tyrranical rule. He was a completely one-note villain. At least Goyer's Zod is a somewhat sympathetic character and we can see his plight. He has lost his world and is fulfilling his purpose as he was designed. He also has a much richer connection to Jor-El. Jor-El is also a big improvement and I found his relationship with Kal even more touching (and real) than Donner's Superman.

Although Zod was given better motivation in this movie, his actor was a complete miscast. He had no gravitas or weight to his role, if the camera wasn't on him all the time he would have disappeared into the background noise.
 

Toa TAK

Banned
I don't really understand it either. It's just Sculli saying that crap, to be honest, and others just deferring to his opinion. Returns is dull as fuck from every single conceivable point of view.

It's got great imagery. But beyond that I don't really care for it.
 
But did you review John Carter before seeing it ?

I haven't reviewed any movie before seeing it. And MOS fans can spin that all they want, doesn't change anything.

You just end up looking bitter that the movie fell so far off the mark.

John Carter is a rental at best compared to MoS.

I'm sure someday some of you will come around to explaining why is that so, you know one day. I guess right now it's a bit hard to explain some of the feelings considering MOS has terrible character development, terrible story arc, terrible pacing... Oh and what about those themes? "Oh yeah we got these big themes, let's just give them a poorly delivered 5 minute flashback scene".

All this love because Cavill looks like superman and buildings fall and shit. The superman suit scene alone was just terribad, something that looked like it was going deliver this sense of freedom and joy and pure excitement.... ended up being just this goddamn empty scene with terrible voice over, that only accomplishes in delivering some cool visual moments when he's flying.

Movie basically is the final nail in the coffin as far as Snyder being considered a hack. It's no surprise to me since he completely fumbled the big fundamentals of Watchmen.
 
I swear some people saw a different movie than I did.

Loved Zod (yes, hammy, but that was the fun part of the movie)
Thought the character development was rich
Loved the story
 

Raptor

Member
I haven't reviewed any movie before seeing it. And MOS fans can spin that all they want, doesn't change anything.

You just end up looking bitter that the movie fell so far off the mark.



I'm sure someday some of you will come around to explaining why is that so, you know one day. I guess right now it's a bit hard to explain some of the feelings considering MOS has terrible character development, terrible story arc, terrible pacing... Oh and what about those themes? "Oh yeah we got these big themes, let's just give them a poorly delivered 5 minute flashback scene".

All this love because Cavill looks like superman and buildings fall and shit. The superman suit scene alone was just terribad, something that looked like it was going deliver this sense of freedom and joy and pure excitement.... ended up being just this goddamn empty scene with terrible voice over, that only accomplishes in delivering some cool visual moments when he's flying.

Movie basically is the final nail in the coffin as far as Snyder being considered a hack. It's no surprise to me since he completely fumbled the big fundamentals of Watchmen.

Is very easy to explain, I don't agree with the people that say JC is better in those departments, and that I think MoS is a very good movie in all departments, sure it has flaws like all movies, this one IMO has pacing and editing issues like I said in my review just after I saw it.

Still loved the movie, on the contrary I thought JC failed in so many areas, again this is my opinion people will disagree all they want though :p

That's why I said JC is a rental at best because that is what I did, I rented and saw it, MoS I watched it 2 times already in the cinema and I plan to buy it.
 

witness

Member
I swear some people saw a different movie than I did.

Loved Zod (yes, hammy, but that was the fun part of the movie)
Thought the character development was rich
Loved the story

Right there with you, loved all of that. I thought Zod was done fantastically. Loved the motivation.
 
I swear some people saw a different movie than I did.

Loved Zod (yes, hammy, but that was the fun part of the movie)
Thought the character development was rich
Loved the story

It's mostly about what you look in a movie.

Why did you think Zod was great? Aside from looking like Marcus Phoenix, the character was incredibly empty, ironically he was like this black hole that just sucks the life of everything around him. What do you know about him? What do you know about his relationship with any of those who surround him?

Zod essentially only seems to have history with Jor El. Zod is basically bad guy 101, he's about as flat as you can get with a villain.

How was character development rich? Lois Lane is flat, and her romantic link with Superman is there just because it had to be there, since I mean... What exactly even happened between them to warrant that kiss? At best their relationship reached the same heights that Portman - Thor did in the Thor movie.

Clark's relationship with everyone who surrounds him is based on concept ideas delivered by bad dialog and rushed sequences that suck the meaning out of them.
Let me just refer to the "the world is too big mom" line, I mean... that just came absolutely out of nowhere. The concept was there, but nothing made it warranted for the kid to say those words.

The relationship he has with his mother is resumed to two brief scenes, the relationship he has with his father is slightly more developed, even if it too is basically in fast forward moment, further hampered down by completely undermining his death through bad editing.
Man honestly, I could go on and on about the problems this movie have. Hell an easy fix would be to cut some of that time Snyder spent shooting door knobs, and spend it on character development.

The story is good? Shit is full of plotholes. Why the hell did they send Zod and his friends to the black hole, in a goddamn terraforming ship? That's just the beginning too..
And the OST sucked for this movie, because honestly there wasn't a single moment where I thought the music was elevating what was happening on screen. And that's what matters, it's not whether you like the listening to those pieces, it's about their effect and use on screen.

Is very easy to explain, I don't agree with the people that say JC is better in those departments, and that I think MoS is a very good movie in all departments, sure it has flaws like all movies, this one IMO has pacing and editing issues like I said in my review just after I saw it.

Still loved the movie, on the contrary I thought JC failed in so many areas, again this is my opinion people will disagree all they want though :p

That's why I said JC is a rental at best because that is what I did, I rented and saw it, MoS I watched it 2 times already in the cinema and I plan to buy it.

See, it's all just empty statements. In the review you wrote, you basically spent your time telling everybody how empty and poor the movie is, and how the positives were basically Cavill is a cool superman. How does John Carter not have better editing, better pacing, better character development. For starters the romantic link makes sense unlike in MOS, John Carter as a character isn't just developed through concepts of ideas. Hell it has humor, and it has an heart and it's trying to make characters come alive.

Everybody has an opinion, but opinions have to make sense when you are trying to actually understand the quality of something. So JC was a rental for you, and you already seen MOS 2 times at the cinema. All that tells me is you really love Superman, and you were waiting for a movie where Superman gets to bang hard. It tells me nothing of the quality of the movie.
Your review did though. And according to your review, the movie fails in too many areas to be considered above JC.
 

LosDaddie

Banned
How was character development rich? Lois Lane is flat, and her romantic link with Superman is there just because it had to be there, since I mean... What exactly even happened between them to warrant that kiss? At best their relationship reached the same heights that Portman - Thor did in the Thor movie..

That's a good comparison. Both relationships felt forced.
 

effzee

Member
It's mostly about what you look in a movie.

Why did you think Zod was great? Aside from looking like Marcus Phoenix, the character was incredibly empty, ironically he was like this black hole that just sucks the life of everything around him. What do you know about him? What do you know about his relationship with any of those who surround him?

Its a movie. Not a novel. We don't need to know his relationship with his whole fucking crew. What kind of crap critcism is this? I have never once heard anyone make these kinds of comments.

"Yeah the movie was cool and all but what was the main villains relationship with his crew members?".

You want relationship? They supported him and his attempt to take over Krypton in an attempt to save Krypton. What else do we need to know? He was was a military general and they his loyal supporters.

Zod essentially only seems to have history with Jor El. Zod is basically bad guy 101, he's about as flat as you can get with a villain.

No. Zod is shown to be someone who is bred genetically to perform one function. Protect and serve the people of Krypton. Its why he tried to over throw the leaders of Krypton, its why he wants the codex, its why he fights Jor El (even-though he agrees with Jor El that the planet is about to blow), and its why he is willing to destroy all human kind to save his own race.

Flat would be a villain who just wants to take over for power and rule the whole galaxy.

How was character development rich? Lois Lane is flat, and her romantic link with Superman is there just because it had to be there, since I mean... What exactly even happened between them to warrant that kiss? At best their relationship reached the same heights that Portman - Thor did in the Thor movie.

This I agree with. Thought the attempt was to show that they go through some of the trials together so they form a bond.

Clark's relationship with everyone who surrounds him is based on concept ideas delivered by bad dialog and rushed sequences that suck the meaning out of them.

Let me just refer to the "the world is too big mom" line, I mean... that just came absolutely out of nowhere. The concept was there, but nothing made it warranted for the kid to say those words.

The relationship he has with his mother is resumed to two brief scenes, the relationship he has with his father is slightly more developed, even if it two is basically in fast forward moment.

Resumed? There is nothing to resume. I agree they could have used more time on the flashbacks or his youth but what they did use shows us exactly what his relationship with is with his Earth parents, his classmates, and his environment.

The world is too big line is because he is hearing everything around the world and seeing it too. So when she comes to help him he knows SHE WILL KNOW exactly what he is talking about.

His relationship with his father is done probably the best only because its the more complicated relationship.

The story is good? Shit is full of plotholes. Why the hell did they send Zod and his friends to the black hole, in a goddamn terraforming ship? That's just the beginning too..

And the OST sucked for this movie, because honestly there wasn't a single moment where I thought the music was elevating what was happening on screen. And that's what matters, it's not whether you like the listening to those pieces, it's about their effect and use on screen.

Story being good has nothing to do with plotholes. The story can be good and still have plot holes. Also ALL movies have plotholes. Depends on if you liked the overall package. If you don't, only then do you actually sit back and nitpick every single scene, line, and story element.

With that said, Zod and his crew were imprisoned by the leaders of Krypton. They did not think the planet was going to blow. Earlier they were rejecting Jor El's claims. To them it does make sense to freeze Zod and his group until all eternity for treason.

And they were not sent with a ship. That ship and others which they then brought to Eart were only gathered after Krypton blew up, breaking the seal of their imprisonment. They then wondered the universe looking for Kryptonians, visiting lost colonies, and THERE THEY GATHERED THE SHIPS.

The music part is very subjective, but I thought the majority here found the score to be pretty awesome and bombastic.
 

KalBalboa

Banned
I'm not sure what people find so great looking about Returns. There are a couple nicely shot sequences, like the plane rescue or Supes chasing/lifting the car with Lex's lady in it (Kitty?), but I don't really see the same "most beautifully shot superhero movie ever" praise that others give it. I think the Dark Knight trilogy and both of Snyder's superhero films are much more remarkable looking.

It has some pretty gorgeous scenes. Even simple long-shots like Clark walking from his parent's house to the fence have amazing color and no visual gimmicks or intense color grading to take away from their effectiveness.

Man of Steel & Returns are pretty different in their approaches, so I'm finding completely different reasons to like both films.
 
Why did you think Zod was great? Aside from looking like Marcus Phoenix, the character was incredibly empty, ironically he was like this black hole that just sucks the life of everything around him. What do you know about him? What do you know about his relationship with any of those who surround him?

Zod's a great example of the simgle-minded foe who is apparently unstoppable *and* convinced he is in the right. It's a terrifying prosprect to face somebody who's both more powerful and more sure of themselves and their motives.

How was character development rich? Lois Lane is flat, and her romantic link with Superman is there just because it had to be there, since I mean... What exactly even happened between them to warrant that kiss? At best their relationship reached the same heights that Portman - Thor did in the Thor movie.

Clark's relationship with everyone who surrounds him is based on concept ideas delivered by bad dialog and rushed sequences that suck the meaning out of them.
Let me just refer to the "the world is too big mom" line, I mean... that just came absolutely out of nowhere. The concept was there, but nothing made it warranted for the kid to say those words.

The relationship he has with his mother is resumed to two brief scenes, the relationship he has with his father is slightly more developed, even if it two is basically in fast forward moment.
Man honestly, I could go on and on about the problems this movie have. Hell an easy fix would be to cut some of that time Snyder spent shooting door knobs, and spend it on character development.

I don't think anyone outside of Superman shows character development. This is his movie. But between the flashbacks, the vignettes of him as an itenerant, and the scenes where he surrenders to humanity show a ton of development. What other action movie has its main character hit half that many beats?

I can pick at your examples-- Superman had saved Lois 3 times, and she had obsessed over him. She was the first person to reach out to him and trust him while knowing his secret. I think that warrants attraction.

"The world is too big" made complete literal sense in that moment. As a parent of yound kids, it sounded perfect.

The story is good? Shit is full of plotholes. Why the hell did they send Zod and his friends to the black hole, in a goddamn terraforming ship? That's just the beginning too..

This tells me that you weren't paying attention. Admittedly, the details are overly complex (a complaint I have with the movie) but that isn't what happened at all. "Black Hole" was their method of imprisonment, and they escaped, and found a terraforming ship in their years in exile.

By story, I mean they story.

Alien child sent to earth
Grows up isolated
Discovers the truth/his own people
They turn out to be dicks/genocidal invaders
Humainty doesn't trust him
He fights aliens, forms bond with people he never had before by coming out of the closet

That's a pretty great story.
 
The trailer's "the world is too big" exchange blows away how stilted it is in the movie.

Kid starts freaking out because he can see skulls and veins and shit (which was a great scene), hides in a closet, and comes up with "the world is too big"? Ugh.
 

KalBalboa

Banned
Kid starts freaking out because he can see skulls and veins and shit (which was a great scene), hides in a closet, and comes up with "the world is too big"? Ugh.

That's because he was hearing trains, cars, etc, from miles away. His super hearing was kicking in and essentially rendering him as if he had ADHD/Aspergers.
 

KalBalboa

Banned
It's a Superman origin story where we don't even see Clark become Superman. There is no character arc there. No natural progression. Superman doesn't even feel like a character in this shitty movie. It's like Goyer and company seemed to have a bunch of dot-pointed story ideas and instead of writing a script, decided to cut from one idea to the other without any sort of narrative momentum or sense of character purpose.

This is all certainly true, but I suppose Cavill's performance and Zimmer's score were enough to get me through Goyer's problems, and Snyder was really trying his best. Goyer could really use a helping hand when it comes to pacing and keeping the eye on the ball.
 
Top Bottom