I swear some people saw a different movie than I did.
Loved Zod (yes, hammy, but that was the fun part of the movie)
Thought the character development was rich
Loved the story
It's mostly about what you look in a movie.
Why did you think Zod was great? Aside from looking like Marcus Phoenix, the character was incredibly empty, ironically he was like this black hole that just sucks the life of everything around him. What do you know about him? What do you know about his relationship with any of those who surround him?
Zod essentially only seems to have history with Jor El. Zod is basically bad guy 101, he's about as flat as you can get with a villain.
How was character development rich? Lois Lane is flat, and her romantic link with Superman is there just because it had to be there, since I mean... What exactly even happened between them to warrant that kiss? At best their relationship reached the same heights that Portman - Thor did in the Thor movie.
Clark's relationship with everyone who surrounds him is based on concept ideas delivered by bad dialog and rushed sequences that suck the meaning out of them.
Let me just refer to the "the world is too big mom" line, I mean... that just came absolutely out of nowhere. The concept was there, but nothing made it warranted for the kid to say those words.
The relationship he has with his mother is resumed to two brief scenes, the relationship he has with his father is slightly more developed, even if it too is basically in fast forward moment, further hampered down by completely undermining his death through bad editing.
Man honestly, I could go on and on about the problems this movie have. Hell an easy fix would be to cut some of that time Snyder spent shooting door knobs, and spend it on character development.
The story is good? Shit is full of plotholes. Why the hell did they send Zod and his friends to the black hole, in a goddamn terraforming ship? That's just the beginning too..
And the OST sucked for this movie, because honestly there wasn't a single moment where I thought the music was elevating what was happening on screen. And that's what matters, it's not whether you like the listening to those pieces, it's about their effect and use on screen.
Is very easy to explain, I don't agree with the people that say JC is better in those departments, and that I think MoS is a very good movie in all departments, sure it has flaws like all movies, this one IMO has pacing and editing issues like I said in my review just after I saw it.
Still loved the movie, on the contrary I thought JC failed in so many areas, again this is my opinion people will disagree all they want though
That's why I said JC is a rental at best because that is what I did, I rented and saw it, MoS I watched it 2 times already in the cinema and I plan to buy it.
See, it's all just empty statements. In the review you wrote, you basically spent your time telling everybody how empty and poor the movie is, and how the positives were basically Cavill is a cool superman. How does John Carter not have better editing, better pacing, better character development. For starters the romantic link makes sense unlike in MOS, John Carter as a character isn't just developed through concepts of ideas. Hell it has humor, and it has an heart and it's trying to make characters come alive.
Everybody has an opinion, but opinions have to make sense when you are trying to actually understand the quality of something. So JC was a rental for you, and you already seen MOS 2 times at the cinema. All that tells me is you really love Superman, and you were waiting for a movie where Superman gets to bang hard. It tells me nothing of the quality of the movie.
Your review did though. And according to your review, the movie fails in too many areas to be considered above JC.