lol I love the meltdown here. It's only an "honest" review when it's a positive one.
Why would an honest reviewer "love the meltdown"? Not saying you're biased (I'm not reading your review), but why would a reviewer enjoy the assumed suffering of others except if that colors their review?
Obviously some reviewers are taking a dump on the film for issues that go beyond itself, Rex Reed writes:
"Despite an obscene budget that could have made a giant stride in the cure for cancer. . . and the whole endeavor appears to be the work of grown men who never outgrew puberty."
It's absurd that cancer cure is the standard of quality for a blockbuster and there's no reason to write the second part except to knock comic book films. He didn't review any others (not Avengers, not Iron Man) besides Dark Knight Rises (1/4) and Man of Steel (2/4)... basically expressing his dissatisfaction with the trend.
If the knife-twist is part of the pleasure of writing the review, it's reasonable to question the legitimacy of the review. Like asking a partisan party member to give you an honest evaluation the speech of another party when there's much more going on in the background than just the evaluation itself.