Liquidsnake
Banned
It's going to be this year's John Carter.
?
It's going to be this year's John Carter.
What's wrong with that? If a group of people find enjoyment out if then great. You don't see others getting up in arms over Sculli hyping up John Carter.
Seems to me like "pandering to fanboys" caused Avengers to be made and be successful. This is the start of WB's Justice League project, there will be fan pandering. What this movie isn't pandering to though is the Donner crowd.I'm hoping the movie is good on its own merits and doesn't just serve as pandering material to the fanboys.
I just think he's kinda hot...I've heard this movie is completely humorless. Like that people appreciate the humor in Nolan's Batman films even more due to how void it is in this film.
Seems to me like "pandering to fanboys" caused Avengers to be made and be successful. This is the start of WB's Justice League project, there will be fan pandering.
oh now we're getting juicy, imagine when we actually see it. 33 more hours...
why is my question so hard to answer? to expect Donner Superman when this has been advertised as anything but it makes me question where that reviewer is coming from.
Some would disagree on that front. I personally really enjoyed the Avengers as a fun blockbuster movie but that movie was full on fan pandering. And as a fan I am 100% OK with that.Avengers was a well-made film in general despite a few plotholes.
Trying to be entertaining isn't "pandering." Especially if the point of your movie is to be fun.
Pandering is a negative. There's no reason to describe a movie that is successful in being a fun action/adventure as "pandering."
It's only pandering when it not only fails at achieving those goals, it fails while putting forth nakedly cynical, half-hearted attempts to achieve them.
It's hard to argue anyone involved with The Avengers was being cynical and half-hearted when it came time to perform.
pan·der (pndr)
intr.v. pan·dered, pan·der·ing, pan·ders
2.To cater to the lower tastes and desires of others or exploit their weaknesses
It sounds to me a lot like Star Trek: Into Darkness, where if you are a big fan of the source material then you won't like it as much (because major elements or themes are changed), but if you just go in expecting a summer movie, then you'll enjoy it quite a bit.
It's going to be this year's John Carter.
The Avengers was definitely pandering to easily excited comic fans.
Critics will hate it, enthusiasts will love it. Of course it'll fair much better in the box office.
If only we could get a JC sequel.
*sigh*
In what way, exactly? Avengers satisfied easily excited comic book fans because it gave them exactly what they were hoping for in a comic book team up movie.
It's like saying restaurants are pandering to customers by giving them the food they ordered.
What do you mean by that? Source material being his red undies or Donners movies?
Don't mean to be that guy, but that's not what pandering means.
The Avengers was definitely pandering to easily excited comic fans.
It did so in terribly low brow manner. But I suppose that's exactly what Marvel's comic writers have been doing for the past few years anyway. A lot of inter-character circle jerking, unnecessary dialogue, and ill-timed humor.
The best analogy I can come up with is that The Avengers was the Brian Michael Bendis title of superhero films.
We're no longer friends.I personally found Captain America to be a better film than Avengers
There is quite a bit changed not related to any of that.
That's - to me, that's being needlessly cynical. What else is that movie supposed to be doing with it's characters if not having them get in action scenes and adventures with each other? I'm not saying it's a great movie, either - I personally found Captain America to be a better film than Avengers - but to use the term "lowbrow" seems weird, to me. It's not as if it was chock-full of dick and fart jokes. That's lowbrow. It was pretty straightforward about what it was trying to do.
It also assumes "comic fans" are the primary audience. or even the secondary audience. They're not. Fans of the CHARACTERS, maybe. But fans of comics? Not a fuckin chance. The number of people who paid to see "The Avengers" who are active comic readers is less than 1%, more than likely.
We're no longer friends.
Just ask yourself this... would Avengers be nearly as good if you had replaced the main heroes with other Marvel characters?
I do feel that comic fans were the primary audience used to build up incredible hype that surrounded the film. The general movie going audience was not familiar with Whedon, and clearly didn't give much of a shit about Marvel's film properties apart from Iron Man. The movie pandered to comic fans by promising and delivering the same bullshit dialogue and plots they've gotten used to with Bendis and Millar on the big screen.
That's - to me, that's being needlessly cynical. What else is that movie supposed to be doing with it's characters if not having them get in action scenes and adventures with each other? I'm not saying it's a great movie, either - I personally found Captain America to be a better film than Avengers - but to use the term "lowbrow" seems weird, to me. It's not as if it was chock-full of dick and fart jokes. That's lowbrow. It was pretty straightforward about what it was trying to do.
It also assumes "comic fans" are the primary audience. or even the secondary audience. They're not. Fans of the CHARACTERS, maybe. But fans of comics? Not a fuckin chance. The number of people who paid to see "The Avengers" who are active comic readers is less than 1%, more than likely.
Oh god.
MOS can't be that bad, can it?
I was pumped for this movie, as the last few trailers have been glorious, but that fact that this is scoring lower than I thought it would is a bit concerning. Though, Watchmen is at a 64%, and I enjoyed that.
I personally found Captain America to be a better film than Avenger.
Just ask yourself this... would Avengers be nearly as good if you had replaced the main heroes with other Marvel characters?
If I had replaced Batman with some other random vigilante hero... Batman Begins would still be a great movie. The first act would remain virtually untouched in its greatness in fact. Hell you could probably say the same about TDK as well, it was less a super hero movie and more a crime epic.
We're no longer friends.
I recall Simo saying there was. I haven't seen him post much though lately so I could be mistaken.
NeoGAF hates Marvel movies if you haven't noticed it. Which is why i find this melt down of Man of Steel so damn funny.
haha
FatboyRoberts, I like John Carter more than Captain America and The Avengers... who's the weirdo? lol
There is. Its not much but there are a few scenes. Mostly though it tries to pull at your heartstrings with every frame.
Dude, GAF loves Marvel movies. The MCU thread is evidence enough of that, they're all hyped as hell for Winter Soldier & Dark World.
I didn't answer because it read like a rhetorical question you asked on the way towards dismissing her opinion. I didn't answer because you weren't looking for one, because if you were actually concerned with the answer, you wouldn't have immediately laid out your case for why she's full of shit and stupid until you'd
a) watched the movie
b) read her article.
So no, I didn't take your "question" on good faith. You pulled this Donner thing out of your ass as a means to reject an article you haven't read yet to defend a movie you haven't seen yet. Nobody BUT YOU mentioned that she might have arrived at her opinion because of some weird adherence to Donner's interpretation.
All that said, she's a former comic book editor, and is very familiar with superheroes, and Superman in particular, throughout his multiple interpretations between 1978 and right now.
not that it matters because you're being fucking ridiculous.
Really? I never took your site serious before, and this solidifies it.
Oh god.
MOS can't be that bad, can it?
I was pumped for this movie, as the last few trailers have been glorious, but that fact that this is scoring lower than I thought it would is a bit concerning. Though, Watchmen is at a 64%, and I enjoyed that.
Really? I never took your site serious before, and this solidifies it.
No way are comics fans the primary audience for ANYTHING successful. They just aren't. There's simply not enough of them. Nor do they really carry enough weight as a purchasing block. If they did, DC/Marvel publishing wouldn't be circling the drain they're circling, financially.
The idea that general audiences didn't give a shit about the Marvel films is ridiculous, as each of them made well over 100 mil at the box office, domestically. Were they huge blockbusters? No, not all of them. But they didn't get to 100 mil based off devout comic readership spreading the word. Those movies worked because they were aimed at people who DON'T read comic books. Much in the same way the Star Trek reboot worked because it appealed to people who DON'T care about Star Trek.
The purchasing power of comics fans is being GREATLY overestimated by you.
It's 1st act was as good as BB's. Rest of the movie was sloppy.I thought Captain America was very good actually. bit more..... erhm, what's the word? .... I don't have a word, I just thought it was good. I enjoyed it more than Avengers. only way I could get my girlfriend to see it was by telling ehr that it was set in teh 40s and that there is one lady that dresses well, that's all the hook she needed, she loves 40s fashion.
Too much negativity here. Between this and TDKR you guys really break my heart. I mean really break my heart.
John Carter is more ambitious and I'd much rather watch it again, but I'd say the middling fun factor is about the same.
Wow, I'm glad my opinion on two movies can have such an overwhelming effect on you.
Too much negativity here. Between this and TDKR you guys really break my heart. I mean really break my heart.
Seeing it Friday morning with my family. My two older nephews (19 & 22) want to see it too. My son graduates from pre-school at 5 PM on Friday so first showing at like 10 is when I will see it.
EDIT: Lay off Expendable. He's a good guy... sometimes I do question his taste. Great Gatsby?!?!?! Come on Jordan.