What is with people adding a "u" to Lois's name? lol
The chemistry between Lois and Clark was dead on.
Cinemascore which gauges the multiple viewing potential of movies
man of steel: A-
For refererence
Iron man 3 : A
Tdkr : A
inception: B+
IMDB is the best site to know general audience's pulse. My personal rating almost match with IMDB's. They are not too critical yet not too liberal. MOS is at 8.4 currently. It will end up around 7.5 i guess which is the apt score for this movie IMO.Cinemascore which gauges the multiple viewing potential of movies
man of steel: A-
For refererence
Iron man 3 : A
Tdkr : A
inception: B+
Saw the film this morning.
I guess I just like Clark Kent more than I like Superman. Too much CG WHOOSH POW BAM that could be from any superhero film and never feels real in any way, not enough human interaction for me (although what was there was actually not too bad).
My favourite scene of the whole film was the very last one. I hope we get more of that in the sequel.
Sniff the coke, Smoke the spliff, Burst the FUCKING crack pipe !!!!!!!!!!!
Film was FUCKING epiccc for me. loved itttt.
Transformers 3: ACinemascore which gauges the multiple viewing potential of movies
man of steel: A-
For refererence
Iron man 3 : A
Tdkr : A
inception: B+
when will people understand that nolan had like zero creative input in this movie, it's all goyer/snyder. all nolan did was pitch the idea to wb.
That is how I am with it. I almost want to see it again to see if my opinion changes, but I also can't bring myself to do it.The more I think on the film, the less I seem to like it :/
I'd like to know what other movies are this divisive between the critics and the readers who rank movies on those sites.
We all know who to thank/blame for how the movie turned out: craft services.
Yeap, but too bad Goyer is back on board to write the script for the sequel.This was 3 out of 5 for me. I get the complaint of too much action scenes, which they had spend more time on developing the characters and their relationships. It's fine if they keep Snyder for the sequel just get a better script writer next time.
Yeap, but too bad Goyer is back on board to write the script for the sequel.
Is kalboa still alive?
He can't the be the only one, they can't get Jonah to clean it up?
I'm gonna disagree on Snyder's culpability, mostly because I feel whatever emotion the movie earned, it earned because he managed to wring it out of a script/story that simply WAS NOT HAVING IT.
Goyer can't do fun, and he can't do heartfelt. He can't. Look at his filmography. He can do tortured, he can do sad, he can do mean-spirited and he can do smartassed, but he can't do fun, good-natured, or heartfelt.
So the fact the movie managed any of those emotions on a perceptible level (and it DOES happen) is probably more Snyder than anything.
JB1981 said:Honestly find this very hard to believe. The editing and exposition are both classic Nolan. This is Superman Nolanized but with action sequences Nolan could only dream of
Its either a great season of person of interest or a great man of steel sequel
CutKrypton to 2 minutes, cut the oil rig scene. That saves 20 minutes.
Use an extra 10 minutes to nicely fit the 'flashbacks' together into a childhood. Use an extra 10 minutes to show more with putting on the suit and developing powers (rather than two big jumps into the sky).
I think that is easily doable whilst maintaining a similar length..You could also play around with the Lois bit in antarctica, scrapping that in favour of a meeting which involves the Daily Planet to better establish the characters there so that we actually care about them.
Though, I would be interested if anyone would ever be bold enough to do an origin story without a big villain. Could you not make an awesome film about growing up and developing powers, without actually facing a massive villain at the end? It would allow much more depth and time to be devoted...
great point, MOS could've just been a great origin story without a big villain. They could've spent time on krypton; spent more time going over Clark's boyhood and developing the Kent's more; then focused on the period where he's a drifter, trying to figure things out and then lastly, the discovery of fortress and him becoming superman! They could've used this origin story to really develop the Kent's, Jor-El, Lois and everyone else focusing just on Clark's internal struggles and how humanity deals with him. A villain? no need for one, MAYBE Lex convincing military that superman is dangerous. I guess they could've just introduced Zod in Krypton, setting things up for a sequel. Action? just military vs superman until in the end, they realize he's a friend not foe. I think this could've been done really well.. develop all characters, build superman for sequels with badass villains! I really think the screenplay tried to fit in way too much...
Maybe I need to rewatch Begins, but I thought this was easily on part with the characterization in Begins. Overall it was Begins but with much better action obviously.
Wow I had no idea.
Honesty, I think part of the hate comes from the fact that it is a Zack Snyder film and people love to shit on him for some reason. They'll take real criticisms and completely over blow it, meanwhile ignoring similar issues in films from other directors.
Honesty, I think part of the hate comes from the fact that it is a Zack Snyder film and people love to shit on him for some reason. They'll take real criticisms and completely over blow it, meanwhile ignoring similar issues in films from other directors.
Zack Snyder is a better Michael Bay.
Saw it
Loved it
8.5/10
Would remove some parts of the movie, and Cavill is not as good as Reeve or even Routh, but I'll take it
Will rewatch today
This might be the first time I have seen anyone write this anywhere on the net and love the movie lol
...I bet Fiora used X-ray vision on Clark and I am sure he did the same on her too!
Real talk. I read a friend's review last night. He didn't like the film, with most of his complaints clearly were related to the script, and he still found some way to blame Synder.
I don't get what people's issues with Synder are. I mean, dude definitely has weaknesses as a film maker, and Sucker Punch was shit, but people act like he's one of the worst filmmakers out there.
Because he's the director.
There's no anti-Snyder conspiracy. At this point it's pretty well known that his films are heavy on flash and light on narrative. You could levy a lot of Man of Steel's issues at Goyer, but Snyder's other films all had that same problem and Goyer didn't write any of those. So if Snyder's new movie comes along and shares a lot of the same problems as his old ones, then I think it's fair to criticize Snyder then, right?
Goyer also wrote Batman Begins and yet that's a vastly better movie. The key difference between the two being the director.
Begins also had nolan as a co writer
I blame the script rather than the actor
Weird cause Returns script made Routh's Superman boring as shit, plus he was just cosplaying Reeve. Routh had nothing to work with in Returns either thanks to Singer.
Oh wait his name is Ralph around here now lol forgot we don't call him Routh anymore.
Wow Kevin Smith called MOS the Batman Begins of Superman films. I might die in my seat out of joy if true.
Why haven't you seen this yet?
Because he's the director.
There's no anti-Snyder conspiracy. At this point it's pretty well known that his films are heavy on flash and light on narrative. You could levy a lot of Man of Steel's issues at Goyer, but Snyder's other films all had that same problem and Goyer didn't write any of those. So if Snyder's new movie comes along and shares a lot of the same problems as his old ones, then I think it's fair to criticize Snyder then, right?
Goyer also wrote Batman Begins and yet that's a vastly better movie. The key difference between the two being the director.