Dreams-Visions
Member
Dat first Flight scene (dat Birthright nod)
Dat Flight score
Dat very brief All-Star pose
Dat Faora fight
Dat Everything
I joined him in the sun, and it was good. He forgave me for my earlier doubts.
*fistbump*
Dat first Flight scene (dat Birthright nod)
Dat Flight score
Dat very brief All-Star pose
Dat Faora fight
Dat Everything
I joined him in the sun, and it was good. He forgave me for my earlier doubts.
FUCK the ciritcs. Fuck them all. I'm sorry but this movie is insanely good. I had high exxpectations but they've somehow all been exceeded. One of my favourite Superhero movies EVER. Certainly the best Superman movie. Better than any Marvel movie I've ever seen. Pretty much the only superhero movies that might be better are the Nolan Batman movies. Loved it. Dat action.
Agreed. I honestly can't comprehend some of the reviews. I dislike Supes as a character, always have, and I felt this was phenomenal. Everything worked for me here. I can see why the jump cuts to his childhood didn't for some people, as it felt very "panel to panel" in a comic book sense, but that's part of why I liked it so much. I do wonder if some people just have origin fatigue in general that might play into it. All I know is this made me like Superman more than the Donner movies ever did and certainly more than Returns.
edit: One more thing. I love how you FELT everything in this film.
A Tale of Two Movies
or:
IHOP: The Movie
With respect to the differing opinion, this just reads as crazy talk to me. I haven't wanted to walk out of a movie more since The Spirit. The fight in Smallville and the final fight were good in concept, if not choreography, but overall it was a floppy, kludgey, bloated, boring mess. Why wasScreams "we need an action scene at all costs" and possibly studio interference.the first 10 minutes on Krypton even in the movie when it could be (and is) easily explained when Clark reaches the ship?
I hope they give Cavill another shot, because there was a flash of Christopher Reeve-level charisma inbut he had nothing to work with most of the time. I liked Superman Returns better, and I hated Superman Returns. Maybe next time they'll finally do a new and interesting story, as opposed to an inferior remake/rehash of a Donner film.his final scene with the general,
What in the hell? Felt what? It was so goddamned sterile when it wasn't being blatantly maudlin. I want to see the movie you guys saw.
A Tale of Two Movies
or:
IHOP: The Movie
Dat first Flight scene (dat Birthright nod)
Dat Flight score
Dat very brief All-Star pose
Dat Faora fight
Dat Everything
I joined him in the sun, and it was good. He forgave me for my earlier doubts.
HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
hated it
Bale out.
Sorry to disappoint anyone hoping for me to either suck the movie off Batman Begins style or tear it apart Captain America style. Sadly its neither as good or as bad as those movies. I wasn't joking when I called it "A Tale Of Two Movies". Those two movies can almost be called "the first half of the movie" and "the second half of the movie".
First comes "the first half of the movie", which is essentially Superman: The Movie circa 2013. I don't mean that as a bad thing nor do I mean it's a Donner wankfest like Returns. Imagine Donner's movie either never existed or wasn't iconic, and MoS was the first or first successful Superman movie. Man Of Steel's first hour has that feeling of carving out an iconography for the character the way S:TM did. I felt the origins and the cross-cutting between timelines was very slick, executed well and was quite affecting. The themes of loneliness, destiny, and family were presented and set up quite nicely.
Then comes "the second half of the movie", which essentially becomes Transformers. Nondescript CG body doubles fighting with other nondescript CG body doubles in nondescript city streets, destroying all kinds of buildings while all sorts of explosions go on in the background. All the work done in exploring themes in the first half of the film gets pushed aside as the movie becomes a Roland Emmerich-esque disaster movie. Tonally the movie flies from one extreme to another. There are lots of fights and ups and downs, but its ultimately meaningless as the film has long since left character and soul behind.
This could have been a great movie with a rewrite or two. Instead it's a half-baked, passable-but-entertaining one that never decided what it wanted to be. It's a mostly well-cast, mostly well-acted, mostly well-shot, mostly well-directed, and completely underwritten movie that lacked a strong voice.
So what's the score?
Damn GAF, someone can write out an entire review of a movie but, without a score, its worthless.
How would you portray a genetically defined soldier.Also, an aside RE: Faora.
Sorry duders, you guys are being blinded by her hotness. The performance is wooden and monotone and not particularly memorable. I think you guys are giving her too much leeway for being hot + having some nice moments of ass kicking.
But yes, she's really hot.
How would you portray a genetically defined soldier.
Go cry somewhere else please.
I was just asking.
Also, an aside RE: Faora.
Sorry duders, you guys are being blinded by her hotness. The performance is wooden and monotone and not particularly memorable. I think you guys are giving her too much leeway for being hot + having some nice moments of ass kicking.
But yes, she's really hot.
Some of you are nuts. This was a great movie. Perfect? No. But really entertaining. Makes Iron Man 3 look like a joke film. Seriously.
A half bushel of ripe bananas.So what's the score?
And for those who've asked (or said so): this movie doesn't have a patch on any of the Nolan Batman movies. People trying to compare it to Batman Begins are woefully off the mark.
And for those who've asked (or said so): this movie doesn't have a patch on any of the Nolan Batman movies. People trying to compare it to Batman Begins are woefully off the mark.
And for those who've asked (or said so): this movie doesn't have a patch on any of the Nolan Batman movies. People trying to compare it to Batman Begins are woefully off the mark.
Blanket statements are great. I'm glad I can objectively look at others opinions.
I'm not sure I'd go that far. It has, at least for the non-battle scenes, the same kind of realistic grit look that Nolan tried to instill in Batman. Compared to like Amazing Spider-Man which looks cartoonish in comparison. Plus the scale of the movie is huge, also in step with Nolan.
There is no Man of Steel criticism more stark than the fact that Earth would have been better off had Kal-El died on Krypton.
Sorry to disappoint anyone hoping for me to either suck the movie off Batman Begins style or tear it apart Captain America style. Sadly its neither as good or as bad as those movies. I wasn't joking when I called it "A Tale Of Two Movies". Those two movies can almost be called "the first half of the movie" and "the second half of the movie".
First comes "the first half of the movie", which is essentially Superman: The Movie circa 2013. I don't mean that as a bad thing nor do I mean it's a Donner wankfest like Returns. Imagine Donner's movie either never existed or wasn't iconic, and MoS was the first or first successful Superman movie. Man Of Steel's first hour has that feeling of carving out an iconography for the character the way S:TM did. I felt the origins and the cross-cutting between timelines was very slick, executed well and was quite affecting. The themes of loneliness, destiny, and family were presented and set up quite nicely.
Then comes "the second half of the movie", which essentially becomes Transformers. Nondescript CG body doubles fighting with other nondescript CG body doubles in nondescript city streets, destroying all kinds of buildings while all sorts of explosions go on in the background. All the work done in exploring themes in the first half of the film gets pushed aside as the movie becomes a Roland Emmerich-esque disaster movie. Tonally the movie flies from one extreme to another. There are lots of fights and ups and downs, but its ultimately meaningless as the film has long since left character and soul behind.
This could have been a great movie with a rewrite or two. Instead it's a half-baked, passable-but-entertaining one that never decided what it wanted to be. It's a mostly well-cast, mostly well-acted, mostly well-shot, mostly well-directed, and completely underwritten movie that lacked a strong voice.
Saw this on twitter. Sadly I agree.
And Solo's review is dead on. Another rewrite or two and it would've been great. It has all the beats, checks all the boxes, but came out undercooked.
I actually think the first half never reaches it's potential because drifter Clark is devoid of any emotion and the flashbacks to his childhood is what really stands out. Sure he is lonely and trying to find his reason for being but I felt that Goyer never fleshes out Clark enough as an adult before he puts on the cape.
Sorry to disappoint anyone hoping for me to either suck the movie off Batman Begins style or tear it apart Captain America style. Sadly its neither as good or as bad as those movies. I wasn't joking when I called it "A Tale Of Two Movies". Those two movies can almost be called "the first half of the movie" and "the second half of the movie".
First comes "the first half of the movie", which is essentially Superman: The Movie circa 2013. I don't mean that as a bad thing nor do I mean it's a Donner wankfest like Returns. Imagine Donner's movie either never existed or wasn't iconic, and MoS was the first or first successful Superman movie. Man Of Steel's first hour has that feeling of carving out an iconography for the character the way S:TM did. I felt the origins and the cross-cutting between timelines was very slick, executed well and was quite affecting. The themes of loneliness, destiny, and family were presented and set up quite nicely.
Then comes "the second half of the movie", which essentially becomes Transformers. Nondescript CG body doubles fighting with other nondescript CG body doubles in nondescript city streets, destroying all kinds of buildings while all sorts of explosions go on in the background. All the work done in exploring themes in the first half of the film gets pushed aside as the movie becomes a Roland Emmerich-esque disaster movie. Tonally the movie flies from one extreme to another. There are lots of fights and ups and downs, but its ultimately meaningless as the film has long since left character and soul behind.
This could have been a great movie with a rewrite or two. Instead it's a half-baked, passable-but-entertaining one that never decided what it wanted to be. It's a mostly well-cast, mostly well-acted, mostly well-shot, mostly well-directed, and completely underwritten movie that lacked a strong voice.
interestingly, some claim the first half was the bad part but that they were rewarded for sticking it out with the second part.