TheRedSnifit
Member
You guys have the correlation mixed up.
The guy's suggesting that the attorney knew he had zero chance of winning, and deliberately introduced a ton of ethically dubious (to say the least) testimony to try and get his client off the hook that way. Not that he deliberately threw the guy under the bus.
And it's obviously working. The article completely ignores the actual crime, despite the prosecution apparently not doing anything sketchy in the least. I wouldn't be surprised if this was actually the case.