It doesn't even have the big name power and [stacked] depth than a 2005-2006 Raw/Smackdown, much less than the 2002-2003 rosters. And on top of that, there is an extra hour per Raw show compared to always being a two hr show.
They keep relying on nostalgia acts because they have zero clue how to make new stars.
Again, I really think that's less the guys/girls themselves and more how they're booked. Just look at how they handle some of these guys from the indies, Japan and NXT. They are all super talented. They know how to be over. They put on great matches. They can be stars... but WWE drops the ball every single time.
the booking and writing has always been bad, since the WWE existed. The difference is that in the past, during their periods of greatest success, there have always been talented individuals with larger than life personalities who the even the WWE, no matter how hard they tried, couldn't keep down in Hogan, Austin and Rock. They don't have anyone like that now. From that regard, there is a talent problem.
ehh, it's always been bad but it's worse now than ever. At least there was some kind of logical storytelling going on during those peak periods. While Austin and Rock led the ship, you had guys like 2 Cool, The New Age Outlaws and Crash Holly OVER AS FUCK. I can assure you that they weren't so talented that they busted through the glass ceiling at WWF. Back then, they would emphasize strengths and minimize weakness. Russo made sure there was a story going on during every segment now matter how low on the card a worker was. In the attitude era, you had 2 hours jam packed with characters and storylines you CARED about... whether or not they were good, looking back, is really irrelevant. It worked, and that's all that matters.
Today, shit doesn't work.
Meltzer reporting that they are piping in boos for Roman Reigns.
yeah it's happening
thank god
the "die roman die" promo on night after mania should be sweet