Sweeney Tom
Banned
All aboard the Kane train friends, Big Strongman is flash in the pan, Good Guy Glenn is for life.
PLSSSSSSSSSSSSS
Also lmfao the Wyatts are beyond done if they can't even win a battle royal nobody else is in
All aboard the Kane train friends, Big Strongman is flash in the pan, Good Guy Glenn is for life.
Harper is believed to have suffered a torn ACL. For whatever reason, his injury is being kept secret but that is the story going around and that he will be out of action for about six months. This is not confirmed, but I believe he has already had his knee surgery which, for whatever reason, maybe because of the nature of his character, has not been reported
FuuuuuuuckSix months. IT JUST
KEEPS
HAPPENING.
they've come a long way since the days of Kelly Kelly, still a ways to go.
What's with the subliminal message in that gif?
All aboard the Kane train friends, Big Strongman is flash in the pan, Good Guy Glenn is for life.
They treated him as the bump man to protect the tall guy who can't move and the huskey guy who can't move.Six months. IT JUST
KEEPS
HAPPENING.
This is all Net_Wrecker's fault. Notice that when he starts posting a bit more regularly, all this news about Kane starts pouring in.
KANE
IN 2016
Dude ain't going anywhere. I imagine he's pretty much guaranteed a backstage job.Libertarian Louie will debut on Impact the second WWE fires Glen.
I saw the results of a marketability study regarding the top WWE characters and it's probably one of the reasons they are strong on Reigns. And this was a current fan-based study and not a general public study, which saw Reigns as the fourth highest ranking wrestler on the roster, trailing Cena (who scored much higher than anyone else), Undertaker and Lesnar. Others faring strongly among the active wrestlers were Orton, HHH and Styles, the latter of which probably surprised people. Ambrose also did well, but was far behind the guys mentioned and Owens didn't fare well at all. That may be why they are reluctant to listen to crowd reactions and think they should push someone else.
...
One major retailer noted that, in order, the top five selling T-shirts at their national chain for 2015 were Cena, Bryan, Reigns, Rollins and Ambrose, in that order.
How do marketability studies work? How do they pick who to study? And then are folks just asked questions? Or does this involve actual face-to-face meetings with groups of people? Like, a focus group sort of thing?
I just find it intriguing.
From the latest Observer -
Remember, people: vote with your wallets. Real fans are, after all.
I remember in late era WCW, they handed out surveys to fans at house shows and TV shows. (Then promptly ignored what the fans told them.) So, probably that, plus focus groups and Internet surveys.
The problem for them is that the audience going to TV tapings aren't taking it.
King Cuerno was offered a spot in the Global Cruiserweight Series but AAA/LU refused to let him go
:[The situation with King Cuerno is up in the air right now. What we know is that he was offered a spot in the WWEs Global cruiserweight tournament and wanted to go, but neither AAA nor LU would allow it. That explains his cryptic tweets from a week or two back. He has the seven season deal. He hasnt worked for AAA since 3/4 and wasnt at the tapings for season three
Reigns is obviously going to rate highly in polls like this. He's one of the only guys who gets a real push. He's fucking everywhere. On every poster. Every magazine. Every ad promotion. When you tell your casual audience for so long "hey, this is the guy you should care about", eventually they'll take to it. The problem for them is that the audience going to TV tapings aren't taking it.
Is that actually a problem if the people still pay hundreds of dollars and fill up the arena to boo Roman when on the other three nights a week, Roman gets heavily cheered at house shows in Corpus Christi and Tulsa?
WrestleMania match against Mr. Gail Kim, Robert Irvine.
WHAT?! The guy who the WWE has been centered around for a year ranked highly? Get the fuck outta town!
Is that actually a problem if the people still pay hundreds of dollars and fill up the arena to boo Roman when on the other three nights a week, Roman gets heavily cheered at house shows in Corpus Christi and Tulsa?
So is the audience taking to Reigns or rejecting him? The narrative is getting hard to follow, friends.
No. It's not. WWE aren't receiving the negative feedback that counts for Reigns.
Marks will just pay hundreds of dollars to sit down at Mania and boo Roman. It's a win win for WWE. Fucking idiot marks. We could have the final shot Mania be an unprecedented amount of booing from the HIGHEST GROSSING WWE EVENT OF ALL TIME. You think they care? You think Roman's going heel or being pulled back on? He's the guy because he's not turning anyone away.
Reigns is obviously going to rate highly in polls like this. He's one of the only guys who gets a real push. He's fucking everywhere. On every poster. Every magazine. Every ad promotion. When you tell your casual audience for so long "hey, this is the guy you should care about", eventually they'll take to it. The problem for them is that the audience going to TV tapings aren't taking it.
Yo, if I can be real real with you. I ain't even sure what that study means.So is the audience taking to Reigns or rejecting him? The narrative is getting hard to follow, friends.
Is that actually a problem if the people still pay hundreds of dollars and fill up the arena to boo Roman when on the other three nights a week, Roman gets heavily cheered at house shows in Corpus Christi and Tulsa?
So is the audience taking to Reigns or rejecting him? The narrative is getting hard to follow, friends.
If it's not a problem this year, then why was it a problem last year, or the year before that? If the narrative is "fans chanting or booing doesn't matter, only sales and polls do" then why did they pull the rug out from under Reigns last year, and why did they pull away from the Orton/Batista main event?
Obviously they think the audience reaction matters to some degree, otherwise the last two years wouldn't have had plans change.
If it's not a problem this year, then why was it a problem last year, or the year before that? If the narrative is "fans chanting or booing doesn't matter, only sales and polls do" then why did they pull the rug out from under Reigns last year, and why did they pull away from the Orton/Batista main event?
Obviously they think the audience reaction matters to some degree, otherwise the last two years wouldn't have had plans change.
Because they got cold feet, incorrectly. I'm the person who thinks Batista should've won at WM30 and Reigns should've won last year.
Wait why would that be correct for roman and especially batista to win anything?
The reasons why Reigns got a great position (WWE pushing him to the moon for over a year) doesn't matter
They will look to the results and keep the plans with the Roman Empire. Let's hope that Seth can save us when he returns
And Roman don't need a heel turn.
The kids, women and the people who buys merchs love him, while the internet fans and most of the crowds hate him.
He's a "real" heel and a "storyline" face at the same time.
Because they got cold feet, incorrectly. I'm the person who thinks Batista should've won at WM30 and Reigns should've won last year.
Because being a proper wrestling fan isn't about supporting the performers that resonate with you or who you think are the most talented, it's about supporting the performers for whom doing so will make you feel like you know the most about the business.