I think that's the compelling part of Hulk's journey to becoming a hero. I don't think it has to be the only thing that's interesting about the character. I also think it's been covered adequately in the three recent movies that have dealt with the character.The thing is Hulk's story is not about the green monster. Its about the man who's burdened with this incredibly destructive rage monster. Until we get that story everything else is just flash and noise. I think they should use Ruffalo to really sell the Bruce Banner side and tie in cool Hulk smash moments.
It can be extremely compelling to consider the situation in the reverse. Difficult because it's harder for us to relate to, but what if Hulk is actually the one trapped in there with the weak, hesitant Banner? Those two arcs explore this a lot.
Yeah that's a good way of putting it.Sometimes it's the destructive rage monster burdened by the man. Sometimes the rage monster has more human emotions. Could work.
This is true but I think it could actually work, maybe even in a stronger way, as flashbacks by the actualized Hulk to his days of struggle with duality, and how the actions of the human Banner inform his actions in a Planet Hulk-esque setting. Ruffalo's body acting is too good to throw out altogether, but I don't think it means that Mark Ruffalo the man has to be who we think of as the character.Ang Lee was all wrong for Hulk. There was so much wrong there from the start. Just because he failed spectacularly doesn't mean it can't be done.