It's official, FOX has given up on trying to make a new film with the Daredevil license. On October 10th Marvel can begin developing a Daredevil project should they choose to do so.
This also allows them to utilize Daredevil and his related characters in the Marvel TV show currently in development.
It's official, FOX has given up on trying to make a new film with the Daredevil license. On October 10th Marvel can begin developing a Daredevil project should they choose to do so.
This also allows them to utilize Daredevil and his related characters in the Marvel TV show currently in development.
DC tries to hire Affleck for Justice League. Marvel swoops in and offers him Daredevil with him starring as Matt Murdock again. The troll is complete.
It's official, FOX has given up on trying to make a new film with the Daredevil license. On October 10th Marvel can begin developing a Daredevil project should they choose to do so.
This also allows them to utilize Daredevil and his related characters in the Marvel TV show currently in development.
It's official, FOX has given up on trying to make a new film with the Daredevil license. On October 10th Marvel can begin developing a Daredevil project should they choose to do so.
This also allows them to utilize Daredevil and his related characters in the Marvel TV show currently in development.
Boo Daredevil. Yay Dr Strange.
I dig those pitch videos.
I wonder how Daredevil will fit into Marvel/Disney's plans.
Marvel to shoehorn in Matt Murdock as lawyer for Stark in Iron Man 3.
Obligatory "What're you blind" from Stark or no deal.
I remember reading somewhere awhile ago that Guillermo Del Toro wanted to do Doctor Strange and Neil Gaiman wanted to write it. The universe would not be able to handle it if that became reality.
It would be more "Oh, my god. You're blind." Followed by jokes about him finding the bathroom or something.
That sounds awesome. I can just imagine the awesome spectacle a Dr Strange movie could be.
If there's any justice in the world Marvel will get back Deadpool and stuff. I have to ask this, is stuff like Cesspool it's own separate licence. I mean he's not a mutant and Fox seem to be Stalinist sweet time with it. Is there a chance Deadpool's rightts could revert back?
Also
http://screenrant.com/marvel-comics-movies-characters-carl-6766/
Deadpool is, unfortunately, part of the X-Men license. He is explicitly named as "Deadpool/Wade Wilson" in the agreement.
Deadpool is, unfortunately, part of the X-Men license. He is explicitly named as "Deadpool/Wade Wilson" in the agreement.
It's official, FOX has given up on trying to make a new film with the Daredevil license. On October 10th Marvel can begin developing a Daredevil project should they choose to do so.
This also allows them to utilize Daredevil and his related characters in the Marvel TV show currently in development.
Oh man, that's great. Rough and bloody retro-style crime thriller suits Daredevil perfectly - shame it's not gonna happen. Same thing with Heroes for Hire - I think a period piece is the best way to approach them.
Getting Kingpin and The Hand back might be the most exciting parts of this for Marvel. Fantastic villains that work with anyone.
After all, if that Heroes for Hire show actually gets made, Kingpin would be a fantastic fit.
It does? Carnahan's pitch is interesting but I don't really see what about Daredevil necessitates being set in the 70s. X-Men or Fantastic Four, I could see what would be gained by making those period pieces, but I don't really see the point in doing that with Daredevil.
Marvel actually wouldn't be getting Kingpin back. Kingpin is apparently part of the Spider-Man property (owned by Sony), and he was just on loan to FOX when he appeared in the DD movie.
The Mouse House cannot exploit characters including Spider-Man, Venom, Ghost Rider, the X-Men, Wolverine, Fantastic Four, the Silver Surfer, Elektra and Deadpool because the those characters were already licensed to other studios. Rights-holders that can prove films are in active development retain those rights in perpetuity.
http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118057848.html?cmpid=RSS|News|LatestNews
What the shit is this? Why is Fox letting go of Daredevil but keeping Electra??
Elektra came out after DD, so it might not have reverted yet.
No, that's incorrect. Kingpin was absolutely part of the Kingpin license, not the Spider-Man one despite the fact that kingpin originates from the Spider-Man comics.
SHH: Does Sony have the rights to Kingpin? That was a great Spider-Man villain until Frank Miller took him for his run on Daredevil and he became known more as a Daredevil villain, appearing in that movie.
Arad: Believe it or not, Kingpin was on loan to Daredevil, so again, anything that is part of the Spider-Man Universe or introduced in the Spider-Man Universe--without getting too legal beagle here--is an opportunity, and if we have a story that Kingpin is important, I'm sure we can handle that.
Reddit AMA with Stan Lee if you missed it
http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/y7lpb/iam_the_real_stan_lee/
That's what I had thought, but apparently not.
http://www.superherohype.com/featur...-with-the-producers-of-the-amazing-spider-man
A U.S. pilot who ends up in space in the middle of a universal conflict and goes on the run with futuristic ex-cons who have something everyone wants.
Variety article certainly isn't "official" as its largely conjecture and touting "sources" as thats how its probably gonna go. Fox could still pull some truly odious shit.
But Daredevil and Punisher potentially in the same Marvel Universe again alongside some Dr Strange action? Almost an entire 3rd wave of movies there!
This never happens to Thor.
Production on “Iron Man 3” was halted Tuesday after actor Robert Downey was hurt while filming a key scene.
“Robert Downey Jr. sustained an ankle injury on the set of ‘Iron Man 3’ in Wilmington, N.C., while performing a stunt,” Marvel Studios said in a statement. “There will be a short delay in the production schedule while he recuperates.”
Despite the delay, the film is expected to be on track for its May 3 release date. That’s key for the studio considering the first two installments in the super hero franchise netted $1.2 billion worldwide at the box office.
The 47-year-old actor is also the biggest name tied to Marvel’s super team up franchise within a franchise “Avengers.”
Production started on the film in June and is said to be nearing a wrapping. The movie also stars returnees Don Cheadle and Gwyneth Paltrow plus new villains Ben Kingsley and Guy Pearce.
Downey had told the Daily News in April he was looking forward to filming the movie, with his old pal screenwriter Shane Black who inherited the director's chair from Jon Favreau.
Any time I put the suit on once I get past the initial discomfort, it's still fun,” Downey said at the time. “I definitely have a return to the sense of wonder that I had before doing the first ‘Iron Man.’”
That's what I had thought, but apparently not.
http://www.superherohype.com/featur...-with-the-producers-of-the-amazing-spider-man
That's what I had thought, but apparently not.
http://www.superherohype.com/featur...-with-the-producers-of-the-amazing-spider-man